Published on in Vol 11 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/68400, first published .
Mpox Prevention Self-Efficacy and Associated Factors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: Large Cross-Sectional Study

Mpox Prevention Self-Efficacy and Associated Factors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: Large Cross-Sectional Study

Mpox Prevention Self-Efficacy and Associated Factors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: Large Cross-Sectional Study

1Dermatology Department, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

2Public Health Research Center, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1111 Xianxia Road, Changning District, Shanghai, China

3School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

4College of Public Health, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China

5Institute of Community Medical Research, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

6Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

*these authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author:

Ying Wang, PhD


Background: Self-efficacy in mpox (formerly known as monkeypox) prevention plays a pivotal role in promoting preventive behaviors by fostering a sense of control and motivation, especially among men who have sex with men (MSM), the population most affected by mpox in many countries.

Objective: This study aims to assess the mpox prevention self-efficacy among MSM in China and identify factors influencing it, using a validated mpox prevention self-efficacy scale.

Methods: From October 2023 to March 2024, a nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted among MSM (aged ≥18 years) across 6 geographic regions in China using a snowball sampling method. The recruited participants (effective response rate=2403/2481, 96.9%) were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire designed based on prior knowledge of mpox and social cognitive theory. The mpox prevention self-efficacy scale was evaluated for construct validity using exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, and its reliability was assessed using the Cronbach α coefficient. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine the factors associated with mpox prevention self-efficacy among MSM.

Results: A total of 2403 MSM participants were included, with a mean age of 29 (IQR 19‐39) years. Of these, 1228 (51.1%) were aged 25‐34 years, 1888 (78.6%) held a college degree or higher, and 2035 (84.7%) were unmarried. The median mpox prevention self-efficacy score was 23 (IQR 18‐28). Exploratory factor analysis retained 6 items of the mpox prevention self-efficacy scale. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a strong model fit (χ²₅=32.1, n=1225; P<.001; comparative fit index=0.991; root mean square error of approximation=0.067; standardized root mean square residual=0.02; goodness-of-fit index=0.992; normed fit index=0.990; incremental fit index=0.991; Tucker-Lewis index=0.974), with all indices within acceptable ranges. The scale demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach α of 0.859. The positive factors associated with mpox prevention self-efficacy were mpox-related knowledge (OR 1.107, 95% CI 1.070‐1.146), perceived risk awareness (OR 1.338, 95% CI 1.132‐1.583), and mpox risk perception (OR 1.154, 95% CI 1.066‐1.250), while the negative factor was age, with individuals aged 25 years and older exhibiting lower self-efficacy in mpox prevention (25‐34 years: OR 0.789, 95% CI 0.642‐0.970; 35‐44 years: OR 0.572, 95% CI 0.444‐0.736; 45 years and older: OR 0.569, 95% CI 0.394‐0.823).

Conclusions: These findings highlight the critical role of targeted interventions to enhance mpox prevention self-efficacy, particularly through increasing knowledge, perceived risk awareness, and risk perception. Such interventions are especially important for middle-aged and older MSM, who may experience a decline in self-efficacy. Strengthening self-efficacy in these areas is essential for promoting sustained preventive behaviors, improving mental well-being, and contributing to more effective mpox prevention and control within the MSM community.

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2025;11:e68400

doi:10.2196/68400

Keywords



Mpox (formerly known as monkeypox) is a viral illness caused by the Monkeypox virus, typically characterized by a skin rash or mucosal lesions lasting 2‐4 weeks. Other symptoms include headache, fever, back pain, muscle aches, fatigue, and swollen lymph nodes [Lu J, Xing H, Wang C, et al. Mpox (formerly monkeypox): pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment. Signal Transduct Target Ther. Dec 27, 2023;8(1):458. [CrossRef] [Medline]1]. The World Health Organization declared the mpox outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern twice: in July 2022 and again in August 2024 [Mpox (monkeypox) outbreak. World Health Organization. 2022. URL: https://www.who.int/emergencies/situations/monkeypox-oubreak-2022 [Accessed 2024-08-20] 2,WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing following the IHR emergency committee meeting on the upsurge of mpox 2024-14. World Health Organization. 2024. URL: https:/​/www.​who.int/​zh/​director-general/​speeches/​detail/​who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-following-the-ihr-emergency-committee-meeting-on-the-upsurge-of-mpox-2024---14-august-2024 [Accessed 2024-08-20] 3]. As of June 30, 2024, there were 99,176 confirmed cases and 208 deaths reported across 116 countries, including 2460 cases in China [2022-24 mpox (monkeypox) outbreak: global trends. World Health Organization. 2024. URL: https://worldhealthorg.shinyapps.io/mpx_global/ [Accessed 2024-08-20] 4]. The outbreak predominantly affects men who have sex with men (MSM), who account for 85.8% of cases with known sexual behavior data [2022-24 mpox (monkeypox) outbreak: global trends. World Health Organization. 2024. URL: https://worldhealthorg.shinyapps.io/mpx_global/ [Accessed 2024-08-20] 4,Vaughan AM, Cenciarelli O, Colombe S, et al. A large multi-country outbreak of monkeypox across 41 countries in the WHO European Region, 7 March to 23 August 2022. Euro Surveill. Sep 2022;27(36):2200620. [CrossRef] [Medline]5]. China, with the world’s largest MSM population—estimated at 8.3 million, nearly 1.8 times the size of the United States’ MSM population—faces unique public health challenges in controlling mpox transmission [Hu M, Xu C, Wang J. Spatiotemporal analysis of men who have sex with men in Mainland China: social app capture-recapture method. JMIR mHealth uHealth. Jan 24, 2020;8(1):e14800. [CrossRef] [Medline]6]. In response, the National Disease Control Bureau of China, in collaboration with the National Health Commission, implemented a prevention and control strategy for mpox [Notice of the General Office of the National Health Commission on the issuance of the Technical Guidelines for Monkeypox Prevention and Control (2022 Edition) [Website in Chinese]. Gov.cn. 2022. URL: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-07/01/content_5698880.htm [Accessed 2024-09-22] 7]. This includes educating high-risk populations, promoting self-protection among MSM, and encouraging timely medical consultations. Although the outbreak in China has been effectively controlled since September 2023, the high mobility and risk behaviors of the MSM population require continued vigilance and proactive measures [Chen HJ, Tang HL, Li PL, et al. Survey on the awareness rate of mpox knowledge and related factors among men who have sex with men in China [Article in Chinese]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. Apr 10, 2024;45(4):559-565. [CrossRef] [Medline]8].

According to social cognitive theory, self-efficacy, defined as the belief in one’s ability to perform actions necessary to achieve desired outcomes [Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist. 1982;37(2):122-147. [CrossRef]9], is a key factor in initiating and maintaining health-related behaviors [Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy. Jan 1978;1(4):139-161. [CrossRef]10]. Self-efficacy has been found to mediate the relationship between HIV self-testing provision and testing frequency among MSM [Zhang C, Huang D, Goldsamt LA, et al. Self-efficacy mediates the effect of providing HIV self-testing kits on HIV testing frequency among Chinese men who have sex with men: results from a randomised controlled trial. Sex Health. Apr 2023;20(2):118-125. [CrossRef] [Medline]11], while it also directly influences the uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis in this population [Liu H, Lai G, Shi G, Zhong X. The influencing factors of HIV-preventive behavior based on health belief model among HIV-negative MSMs in Western China: a structural equation modeling analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Aug 17, 2022;19(16):10185. [CrossRef] [Medline]12], suggesting that enhancing self-efficacy may serve as an effective strategy to improve preventive health behaviors in at-risk populations. In the context of mpox prevention, self-efficacy is particularly critical for MSM, as it influences their confidence in adopting preventive measures, such as consistent condom use, vaccination, testing, and seeking timely medical care [DiIorio C, Dudley WN, Kelly M, Soet JE, Mbwara J, Sharpe Potter J. Social cognitive correlates of sexual experience and condom use among 13- through 15-year-old adolescents. J Adolesc Health. Sep 2001;29(3):208-216. [CrossRef] [Medline]13-Lawrence A. Assessing vaccine intentions, knowledge, self-efficacy, and trust: a cross-sectional study on perceptions of monkeypox vaccination and public health risk awareness in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. Cureus. Oct 2024;16(10):e72131. [CrossRef] [Medline]16]. High self-efficacy has been associated with greater motivation to engage in mpox prevention behaviors and better adherence to preventive strategies, even among MSM who may continue to engage in high-risk behaviors despite awareness of mpox [Tan F, Oka P, Dambha-Miller H, Tan NC. The association between self-efficacy and self-care in essential hypertension: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. Feb 22, 2021;22(1):44. [CrossRef] [Medline]17,Wang SD, Loftus P, Pang RD, Kirkpatrick MG. Impact of self-efficacy on daily intention to not smoke. Addict Behav. Jul 2021;118:106877. [CrossRef] [Medline]18]. Given these findings, understanding mpox prevention self-efficacy in MSM is essential for informing targeted interventions and enhancing prevention strategies by identifying priority groups and potential barriers to mpox prevention and control.

A significant challenge in studying self-efficacy in mpox prevention is the lack of standardized measurement tools. Previous studies have primarily relied on single-item measures to assess the association between self-efficacy and mpox vaccination intentions [Lawrence A. Assessing vaccine intentions, knowledge, self-efficacy, and trust: a cross-sectional study on perceptions of monkeypox vaccination and public health risk awareness in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. Cureus. Oct 2024;16(10):e72131. [CrossRef] [Medline]16,Winters M, Malik AA, Omer SB. Attitudes towards Monkeypox vaccination and predictors of vaccination intentions among the US general public. PLoS One. 2022;17(12):e0278622. [CrossRef] [Medline]19] or used generalized instruments such as the General Self-Efficacy Scale or isolated questions [Winters M, Malik AA, Omer SB. Attitudes towards Monkeypox vaccination and predictors of vaccination intentions among the US general public. PLoS One. 2022;17(12):e0278622. [CrossRef] [Medline]19,Lee J, Lee EH, Chae D. Self-efficacy instruments for type 2 diabetes self-care: a systematic review of measurement properties. J Adv Nurs. Aug 2020;76(8):2046-2059. [CrossRef] [Medline]20]. Although these tools provide a general assessment, they fail to capture the nuanced dimensions of self-efficacy specific to mpox prevention. This limitation is particularly pronounced in the MSM population, where tailored assessments are essential to address unique behavioral and psychosocial factors. The lack of specificity and comprehensiveness in these existing measures not only undermines the validity of research findings, but also hampers the development of targeted interventions. Therefore, there is a clear need for tools specifically tailored to mpox prevention, integrating established scales with the unique characteristics of mpox.

Existing research indicates that the self-efficacy of MSM in preventing mpox may be influenced by multiple factors at various levels, including sociodemographic characteristics (eg, age, education level) [Takahashi LM, Magalong MG, Debell P, Fasudhani A. HIV and AIDS in suburban Asian and Pacific Islander communities: factors influencing self-efficacy in HIV risk reduction. AIDS Educ Prev. Dec 2006;18(6):529-545. [CrossRef] [Medline]21], behavioral factors (eg, engagement in unsafe sexual practices) [Khumsaen N, Stephenson R. Beliefs and perception about HIV/AIDS, self-efficacy, and HIV sexual risk behaviors among young Thai men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. Apr 2017;29(2):175-190. [CrossRef] [Medline]22], and disease-related factors (eg, disease-related knowledge, risk perception) [Villegas Rodríguez N, Ferrer Lagunas LM, Cianelli Acosta R, Miner S, Lara Campos L, Peragallo N. Knowledge and self efficacy related with HIV prevention among Chilean women. Invest Educ Enferm. 2011;29(2):222-229. [Medline]23]. Research indicates that disease-related knowledge forms the basis for accurate health beliefs and enhances confidence in adopting safe sexual behaviors. A positive correlation has been observed between the level of disease-related knowledge and self-efficacy [Carter G, Brown L, Mahnke B, Ohmit A, Woodward B. Sexual communication self-efficacy and PrEP literacy helps to meet HIV prevention outcomes among Black and Latinx individuals. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022;13:21501319221099789. [CrossRef] [Medline]24,Black DS, Sun P, Rohrbach LA, Sussman S. Decision-making style and gender moderation of the self-efficacy-condom use link among adolescents and young adults: informing targeted STI/HIV prevention programs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Apr 2011;165(4):320-325. [CrossRef] [Medline]25]. Additionally, mpox perceived risk awareness refers to individuals’ recognition of the potential harm or likelihood of mpox in their surroundings [Lavallee S, Hynds PD, Brown RS, Majury A. Classification of sub-populations for quantitative risk assessment based on awareness and perception: a cross-sectional population study of private well users in Ontario. Sci Total Environ. Jan 20, 2023;857(Pt 3):159677. [CrossRef] [Medline]26,Gray-Scholz D, Haney TJ, MacQuarrie P. Out of sight, out of mind? Geographic and social predictors of flood risk awareness. Risk Anal. Nov 2019;39(11):2543-2558. [CrossRef] [Medline]27], while risk perception pertains to the subjective judgment of one’s personal susceptibility to mpox [Jiao K, Xu Y, Huang S, et al. Mpox risk perception and associated factors among Chinese young men who have sex with men: Results from a large cross-sectional survey. J Med Virol. Aug 2023;95(8):e29057. [CrossRef] [Medline]28]. Evidence suggests that risk perception is a key trigger for both preventive awareness and action [Wiedemann PM, Schütz H. The precautionary principle and risk perception: experimental studies in the EMF area. Environ Health Perspect. Apr 2005;113(4):402-405. [CrossRef] [Medline]29]. Along with disease-specific knowledge and awareness of environmental health risks, risk perception significantly influences mpox prevention awareness and behaviors [Renner B, Schupp H, Vollmann M, Hartung FM, Schmälzle R, Panzer M. Risk perception, risk communication and health behavior change. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie. Jul 2008;16(3):150-153. [CrossRef]30]. However, the relationship between mpox perceived risk awareness, mpox risk perception, and self-efficacy, particularly among MSM, remains an underexplored area.

Given the critical role of self-efficacy in sustaining preventive motivation and goal-directed behavior among MSM, it is essential to assess it within the context of mpox prevention. While existing research on mpox prevention in MSM has primarily focused on vaccination willingness and testing behavior [Luo S, Jiao K, Zhang Y, et al. Behavioral intention of receiving monkeypox vaccination and undergoing monkeypox testing and the associated factors among young men who have sex with men in China: large cross-sectional study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. Mar 19, 2024;10:e47165. [CrossRef] [Medline]15,Li Y, Peng X, Fu L, et al. Monkeypox awareness and low vaccination hesitancy among men who have sex with men in China. J Med Virol. Feb 2023;95(2):e28567. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10969071/95/2 [Accessed 2025-02-03] [CrossRef]31-Zheng M, Qin C, Qian X, et al. Knowledge and vaccination acceptance toward the human monkeypox among men who have sex with men in China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:997637. [CrossRef] [Medline]33], there is a notable gap in understanding the self-efficacy of MSM in mpox prevention and the factors that influence it. Identifying these factors can help guide the development of targeted interventions. This study aims to evaluate mpox prevention self-efficacy among MSM in China, examining the impacts of sociodemographic characteristics, mpox-related knowledge, perceived risk awareness, and risk perception. By identifying these factors, the study seeks to provide a theoretical basis for designing more effective mpox prevention strategies tailored to this vulnerable population, while simultaneously contributing to improved behavioral outcomes and mental well-being within the MSM community.


Study Design

From October 2023 to March 2024, a nationwide cross-sectional study was conducted among MSM (age ≥18 years) across 6 geographic regions in China. Survey sites were located in the Northwest (Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region), Northeast (Liaoning Province), Central (Shaanxi Province), Southwest (Yunnan Province), Southeast (Guangdong Province), and Eastern coastal region (Shanghai Municipality). Details of the program have been described previously [Gao Y, Liu S, Xu H, et al. The Mpox vaccine hesitancy scale for Mpox: links with vaccination intention among men who have sex with men in six cities of China. Vaccines (Basel). Sep 3, 2024;12(9):1009. [CrossRef] [Medline]34].

Participant Recruitment and Data Collection

Eligibility criteria for participants included: (1) born male; (2) aged ≥18 years old; (3) have ever engaged in sex with men within the last six months; (4) primarily reside in one of the selected locations during the same period; and (5) agree to participate in the survey. Simultaneously, participants were excluded if they: (1) completed the questionnaire within 300 seconds; (2) failed the quality control questions (eg, Is Guangzhou, Shanghai, Beijing, or Shenzhen the capital city in China?); and (3) had an IP address indicating a location outside the target regions.

Participants were recruited from 6 cities in China with the assistance of local governmental centers for disease control and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), using a snowball sampling method. The NGOs routinely engaged with the MSM population in the region and were well-acquainted with local disease prevention and control initiatives. Initially, NGO staff, serving as primary investigators in each region, underwent training on recruitment procedures. They were tasked with recruiting 5‐10 “seed” participants (MSM individuals with good outreach potential) who met the inclusion criteria from each region. These seed participants were then asked to recruit additional participants from their social networks until the target sample size was achieved. Data collection was conducted entirely anonymously through an online survey. Participants accessed the electronic questionnaire via QR code scanning at designated survey locations. NGO staff assisted participants in completing the online survey, providing technical support and non-directive guidance as necessary, in accordance with the study protocol outlined previously [Gao Y, Liu S, Xu H, et al. The Mpox vaccine hesitancy scale for Mpox: links with vaccination intention among men who have sex with men in six cities of China. Vaccines (Basel). Sep 3, 2024;12(9):1009. [CrossRef] [Medline]34].

After thorough verification, a total of 2481 questionnaires were collected, of which 2403 were deemed valid, yielding an effective response rate of 96.9%. The collected data underwent thorough cleaning and processing, including checks for missing data, outliers, and logical inconsistencies, with necessary adjustments and corrections made accordingly.

Ethical Considerations

The study was approved by Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences (approval number 2023-MSMMPOX-22‐310222197604080237) on October 8, 2023. All participants signed electronic informed consent forms. Data collection was conducted anonymously using an electronic questionnaire administered through a secure, privacy-compliant platform (Wenjuanxing) via QR code scanning. To encourage participation, each individual who completed the survey and passed quality checks received Chinese yuan (CNY) 80 (about US $10.96). To ensure confidentiality, deidentified data were used for subsequent analysis.

Variables

Sociodemographic Characteristics

A range of sociodemographic characteristics (including age, education level, marital status, and monthly income) and disease diagnoses (including hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia) were assessed via self-report.

Mpox Prevention Self-Efficacy

Based on Bandura’s self-efficacy theory and established scales [Winters M, Malik AA, Omer SB. Attitudes towards Monkeypox vaccination and predictors of vaccination intentions among the US general public. PLoS One. 2022;17(12):e0278622. [CrossRef] [Medline]19], such as the HIV Prevention Self-Efficacy Scale [Ravelo GJ, Sanchez M, Cyrus E, De La Rosa M, Peragallo N, Rojas P. Associations between gender norms and HIV self-efficacy among Latina immigrants in a farmworker community. Ethn Health. Jan 2022;27(1):27-39. [CrossRef] [Medline]35] and the Self-Efficacy for HIV Prevention Behaviors Scale [Cianelli R, Ferrer L, Norr KF, et al. Mano a Mano-Mujer: an effective HIV prevention intervention for Chilean women. Health Care Women Int. 2012;33(4):321-341. [CrossRef] [Medline]36], we developed a 6-item mpox prevention self-efficacy scale tailored to the characteristics of MSM and mpox prevention. The scale aimed to assess individuals’ confidence in their ability to effectively prevent mpox. Each item was rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from “1 strongly disagree” to “5 strongly agree,” as described in Table S1 in

Multimedia Appendix 1

Independent samples t test discrimination results of the mpox prevention self-efficacy scale (N=2403).

DOC File, 18 KBMultimedia Appendix 1. The composite variable was calculated by summing the scores of these items (range: 6‐30, Cronbach α=0.859), with a higher score indicating higher mpox prevention self-efficacy. A total score was categorized into 2 groups based on the median (median=23, skewness=−0.94): no/low self-efficacy (<23) and self-efficacy (≥23). When the independent variables are uncorrelated and exhibit a skewed distribution, the median is considered an effective tool for segmentation, which is the case for the variables in our study [Chan ZYS, Chong SY, Niaupari S, et al. Receptiveness to monkeypox vaccines and public health communication strategies among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Singapore: cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative insights. Sex Transm Infect. Aug 19, 2024;100(6):362-367. [CrossRef] [Medline]37,Bien-Gund CH, Shaw PA, Agnew-Brune C, et al. HIV self-testing and risk behaviors among men who have sex with men in 23 US cities, 2017. JAMA Netw Open. Dec 1, 2022;5(12):e2247540. [CrossRef] [Medline]38].

Mpox-Related Knowledge

Mpox-related knowledge included 12 yes/no questions designed to evaluate participants’ understanding of mpox, covering various aspects such as pathogenesis (eg, “Mpox is a viral infectious disease”), epidemiological characteristics (eg, “Mpox can be transmitted through mucous membranes and broken skin”), clinical manifestations (eg, “The only symptom of mpox is a rash”), and preventive measures (eg, “Smallpox vaccination can be used to prevent mpox”). The overall score was calculated by counting the number of correct answers, with each correct response scoring 1 point. Higher scores indicated greater knowledge of mpox, with a possible range of 0‐12 (Cronbach α=0.80).

Mpox Perceived Risk Awareness

Perceived risk awareness, primarily utilized in public environmental health research, refers to the level of participants’ attentiveness to potential risks in their environment [Lavallee S, Hynds PD, Brown RS, Majury A. Classification of sub-populations for quantitative risk assessment based on awareness and perception: a cross-sectional population study of private well users in Ontario. Sci Total Environ. Jan 20, 2023;857(Pt 3):159677. [CrossRef] [Medline]26,Gray-Scholz D, Haney TJ, MacQuarrie P. Out of sight, out of mind? Geographic and social predictors of flood risk awareness. Risk Anal. Nov 2019;39(11):2543-2558. [CrossRef] [Medline]27]. We developed a composite variable for mpox perceived risk awareness based on 4 statements [Jiao K, Xu Y, Huang S, et al. Mpox risk perception and associated factors among Chinese young men who have sex with men: Results from a large cross-sectional survey. J Med Virol. Aug 2023;95(8):e29057. [CrossRef] [Medline]28], each rated on a 5-point Likert scale (from “1=strongly agree” to “5=strongly disagree”). A composite scale score was calculated by summing the item scores, with higher scores indicating greater awareness of risks associated with mpox (range: 0‐20; Cronbach α=0.906). A total score was categorized into 2 groups based on the median: low perceived risk awareness (<17.00) and high perceived risk awareness (≥17.00).

Mpox Risk Perception

Risk perception refers to how people perceive the likelihood of experiencing harm or loss due to a disease and represents a subjective judgment of disease susceptibility [Jiao K, Xu Y, Huang S, et al. Mpox risk perception and associated factors among Chinese young men who have sex with men: Results from a large cross-sectional survey. J Med Virol. Aug 2023;95(8):e29057. [CrossRef] [Medline]28]. It is a core construct in many health behavior theories, such as the Protection Motivation Theory and the Health Belief Model [Gellman M, Turner J. Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. 2013. [CrossRef] ISBN: 978-1-4419-1004-239]. In the Health Belief Model, risk perception encompasses perceived susceptibility (belief in the likelihood of contracting a disease) and perceived severity (the perceived seriousness of the disease) [Janz NK, Becker MH. The Health Belief Model: a decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984;11(1):1-47. [CrossRef] [Medline]40]. In this study, considering the substantial variability in the clinical manifestations of mpox among individuals, mpox risk perception specifically focuses on participants’ beliefs regarding the likelihood of contracting mpox. The statement “I believe I am someone who is likely to contract mpox” was used to assess personal mpox risk perception on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree” [Jiao K, Xu Y, Huang S, et al. Mpox risk perception and associated factors among Chinese young men who have sex with men: Results from a large cross-sectional survey. J Med Virol. Aug 2023;95(8):e29057. [CrossRef] [Medline]28].

Statistical Analysis

First, descriptive statistics were used to characterize the distribution of the variables. Continuous variables, which were non-normally distributed, were presented as medians and IQRs, while categorical variables were described using frequencies and percentages. Second, the content validity of the questionnaire was evaluated using the critical ratio method and Spearman correlation coefficient (N=2403). The total scores of the mpox prevention self-efficacy scale were ranked from low to high, with the bottom 27% classified as the low-score group and the top 27% as the high-score group. The discrimination of each item was tested using an independent samples t test between these 2 groups. Additionally, the total sample was randomly split into 2 subsets using a random number method: one subset (n=1178) was used for exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and the other (n=1225) for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), to cross-validate the scale. For EFA, the feasibility of factor analysis was assessed using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test and Bartlett test of sphericity. For CFA, model fit was assessed using several fit indices: the chi-square goodness-of-fit (χ²/df), goodness-of-fit index (GFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), normed fit index (NFI), comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), and incremental fit index (IFI). The average variance extracted and composite reliability were also computed to assess the scale’s convergent and discriminant validity. Third, univariate logistic regression was employed to examine the crude associations between the outcome variable and the variables of interest (ie, mpox-related and demographic variables). Fourth, a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with mpox prevention self-efficacy, using the Enter method. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs were estimated. Variance inflation factors were calculated to ensure the independence of each variable in the model, as described in Table S2 in

Multimedia Appendix 2

Results of collinearity diagnosis for the multivariable logistic regression analysis of mpox prevention self-efficacy among MSM in 6 Chinese cities (N=2403), from a survey conducted from October 2023 to March 2024.

DOC File, 18 KBMultimedia Appendix 2. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated a good model fit (χ²8=6.047, P=.642). Descriptive, univariate, and multivariable analyses were conducted using SPSS software (version 22.0; IBM Corp). The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were assessed using AMOS software (version 28.0; IBM Corp). Forest plots were generated using GraphPad Prism software (version 9.5; GraphPad Software Inc).


Demographic Characteristics

The median age of participants was 29 (IQR 19‐39) years old. In the 30-point self-efficacy score, the median mpox prevention self-efficacy score was 23 (IQR 18‐28). The majority held a college degree or higher (n=1888, 78.6%), were unmarried (n=2035, 84.7%), and did not have diabetes (n=2334, 97.1%), hypertension (n=2248, 93.6%), or hyperlipidemia (n=2181, 90.8%). Among the participants, those with a college education or higher (1017/1888, 53.9%) and those who were divorced or widowed (62/113, 54.9%) demonstrated higher levels of mpox prevention self-efficacy (Table 1).

Table 1. Background characteristics for all included MSMa in 6 Chinese cities according to mpox prevention self-efficacy (N=2403), from a survey conducted from October 2023 to March 2024.
CharacteristicOverallNo/low self-efficacySelf-efficacyP value
Age (years)
Median (IQR)29 (19‐39)30 (19‐41)28 (19‐37)<.001
18‐24, n (%)564 (23.5)225 (20)339 (26.5)<.001
25‐34, n (%)1228 (51.1)563 (50.1)665 (52)
35‐44, n (%)459 (19.1)249 (22.2)210 (16.4)
45, n (%)152 (6.3)86 (7.7)66 (5.2)
Education level, n (%)
Junior high school and below157 (6.5)85 (54.1)72 (45.9).16
Senior high school358 (14.9)167 (46.7)191 (53.4)
College or above1888 (78.6)871 (46.1)1017 (53.9)
Marital status, n (%)
Unmarried2035 (84.7)937 (46)1098 (54).11
Married255 (10.6)135 (52.9)120 (47.1)
Divorced or widowed113 (7.4)51 (45.1)62 (54.9)
Income (CNYb), n (%)
≤3000 (US $414)502 (20.9)254 (50.6)248 (49.4).01
3001‐6000 (US $414-$828)851 (35.4)403 (47.4)448 (52.6)
6001‐12,000 (US $828-$1656)802 (33.4)340 (42.4)462 (57.6)
>12,000 (US $1656)248 (10.3)126 (50.8)122 (49.2)
Hypertension, n (%)
No2248 (93.6)1049 (46.7)1199 (53.3).80
Yes155 (6.5)74 (47.7)81 (52.3)
Diabetes, n (%)
No2334 (97.1)1086 (46.5)1248 (53.5).24
Yes69 (2.9)37 (53.6)32 (46.4)
Hyperlipemia, n (%)
No2181 (90.8)991 (45.4)1190 (54.6)<.001
Yes222 (9.2)132 (59.5)90 (40.5)
Mpox-related knowledge, median (IQR)8 (5-11)8 (5-11)9 (6‐12)<.001
Perceive risk awareness, n (%)
Low1173 (48.8)609 (51.9)564 (48.1)<.001
High1230 (52.2)514 (41.8)716 (58.2)
Mpox risk perception, median (IQR)3 (2-4)3 (2-4)4 (3-5)<.001

aMSM: men who have sex with men.

bCNY: Chinese yuan. An exchange rate of CNY 1=US $0.14 has been applied.

Reliability and Validity Assessment of the Mpox Prevention Self-Efficacy Scale

Content Validity of the Scale

The results of the independent samples t test revealed statistically significant differences between the high-score group (top 27%) and the low-score group (bottom 27%) across all items (P<.001), as described in Table S1 in

Multimedia Appendix 1

Independent samples t test discrimination results of the mpox prevention self-efficacy scale (N=2403).

DOC File, 18 KBMultimedia Appendix 1. The critical ratio was 65.957, indicating that the scale possesses strong discriminatory power. Furthermore, Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated that the correlation coefficients between the total questionnaire score and the scores of the 6 items ranged from 0.746 to 0.817 (P<.001), suggesting that each item is highly representative of the overall construct.

Construct Validity of the Scale

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.817, and the Bartlett test yielded a χ²15 value of 3442.5 (P<.001), indicating that the data were suitable for factor analysis. EFA of the baseline data extracted a single factor with an eigenvalue greater than 1.00, accounting for 60.02% of the total variance. The factor loadings for each item on the common factor ranged from 0.630 to 0.799 (Table 2).

Table 2. Factor loadings of the mpox prevention self-efficacy scale for men who have sex with men (n=1225).
PathStandardized factor loadingsSEP valueCRaAVEb
C1_1<--Self_efficacy0.6300.8450.478
C1_2<--Self_efficacy0.6400.043<.001
C1_3<--Self_efficacy0.6450.070<.001
C1_4<--Self_efficacy0.6640.058<.001
C1_5<--Self_efficacy0.7520.056<.001
C1_6<--Self_efficacy0.7990.055<.001

aCR: composite reliability.

bAVE: average variance extracted.

We then conducted a CFA on the baseline data to evaluate the global model fit of the factor structure suggested by the EFA, as described in Figure S1 in

Multimedia Appendix 3

Standardized one-factor structural model of the mpox prevention self-efficacy scale (n=1225).

PNG File, 101 KBMultimedia Appendix 3. The overall model fit was good (χ²5=32.1, n=1225; P<.001; CFI=0.991; RMSEA=0.067; SRMR=0.02; GFI=0.992; NFI=0.990; IFI=0.991; TLI =0.974). All indices were within acceptable ranges, indicating that the model was well-aligned with the data (Table 3).

Table 3. Model fit index of the mpox prevention self-efficacy scale for men who have sex with men (n=1225).
Model fitting indexChi-square (df)aRMSEAbSRMRcGFIdCFIeNFIfTLIgIFIh
Reference value<3.000<0.080<0.050>0.900>0.900>0.900>0.900>0.900
Model value6.4160.0670.01840.9920.9910.9900.9740.991

aChi-square (df): χ2 goodness-of-fit.

bRMSEA: root mean square error of approximation.

cSRMR: standardized root mean square residual.

dGFI: goodness-of-fit index.

eCFI: comparative fit index.

fNFI: normed fit index.

gTLI: Tucker-Lewis index.

hIFI: incremental fit index.

Reliability Analysis of the Scale

The Cronbach α coefficient for the mpox prevention self-efficacy scale was 0.859, indicating good internal consistency (Cronbach α>0.80).

Factors Associated With Mpox Prevention Self-Efficacy

Univariate Logistic Regression Analysis

Univariate analysis revealed that higher levels of mpox-related knowledge, greater perceived risk awareness, and increased mpox risk perception were significantly associated with higher mpox prevention self-efficacy. Conversely, older MSM demonstrated lower self-efficacy in mpox prevention. All these differences were statistically significant (Table 4).

Table 4. Univariate logistic regression analysis of mpox prevention self-efficacy among men who have sex with men in 6 Chinese cities (N=2403), from a survey conducted from October 2023 to March 2024.
CharacteristicOdds ratio95% CIP value
Age group, years (reference: 18‐24)
25‐340.7840.640‐0.960.02
35‐440.5600.436‐0.718<.001
450.5090.355‐0.732<.001
Education level (reference: junior high school and below)
Senior high school1.3500.927‐1.967.12
College or above1.3780.994‐1.911.05
Marital status (reference: unmarried)
Married0.7590.584‐0.985.04
Divorced or widowed1.0370.709‐1.518.85
Income, CNYa (reference: ≤3000 [US $414])
3001‐6000 (US $414-$828)1.1390.913‐1.420.25
6001‐12,000 (US $828-$1656)1.3921.112‐1.741.004
>12,000 (US $1656)0.9920.732‐1.344.96
Disease-related factor
Mpox-related knowledge1.1241.088‐1.163<.001
Perceived risk awareness (high versus low)1.3381.132‐1.583.001
Mpox risk perception1.1571.070‐1.252<.001

aCNY: Chinese yuan. The exchange rate used is 1 CNY =0.14USD.

Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis

Variables with statistically significant differences from the univariate analysis were included in the multivariable logistic regression model (Figure 1). In this analysis (Y: mpox prevention self-efficacy, 0=no/low self-efficacy, 1=self-efficacy), the positive factors associated with mpox prevention self-efficacy were mpox-related knowledge (OR 1.107, 95% CI 1.070‐1.146), perceived risk awareness (OR 1.338, 95% CI 1.132‐1.583), and mpox risk perception (OR 1.154, 95% CI 1.066‐1.250). Individuals over the age of 25 years may exhibit lower self-efficacy in mpox prevention (25‐34 years: OR 0.789, 95% CI 0.642‐0.970; 35‐44 years: OR 0.572, 95% CI 0.444‐0.736; 45 years and older: OR 0.569, 95% CI 0.394‐0.823).

Figure 1. Multivariable logistic regression analysis of mpox prevention self-efficacy among MSM in 6 Chinese cities (N=2403), from a survey conducted from October 2023 to March 2024. The categories “18‐24 years old” and “low perceived risk awareness” were used as references in the model. MSM: men who have sex with men.

Principal Findings

This study represents one of the earliest investigations into mpox prevention self-efficacy and its influencing factors among MSM. Given that the mpox outbreak was once again declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern in 2024, concerns about the potential spread of the virus—particularly within the MSM community—have intensified. This highlights the critical need for effective preventive strategies tailored to this high-risk group. Considering the crucial role of self-efficacy in health behaviors and disease prevention, our findings offer valuable public health insights for managing mpox outbreaks and enhancing the psychological and behavioral well-being of the MSM population.

Comparison With Prior Work

The study found that the median mpox prevention self-efficacy score was 23 (IQR 18‐28), with a negatively skewed distribution of self-efficacy scores. This suggests that most participants demonstrated relatively high self-efficacy scores in preventing mpox, though a small proportion reported lower self-efficacy levels. These results indicate that, while the MSM community generally exhibits strong preparedness for mpox prevention, targeted interventions may be necessary for individuals with lower self-efficacy. Establishing and reinforcing high levels of mpox prevention self-efficacy is essential, as it plays a critical role in identifying at-risk populations and implementing targeted interventions [Villegas N, Cianelli R, Gonzalez-Guarda R, Kaelber L, Ferrer L, Peragallo N. Predictors of self-efficacy for HIV prevention among Hispanic women in South Florida. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2013;24(1):27-37. [CrossRef] [Medline]41,Sheeran P, Maki A, Montanaro E, et al. The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. Nov 2016;35(11):1178-1188. [CrossRef] [Medline]42]. Strengthening self-efficacy, particularly among those with lower initial scores, can improve both individual and community-level responses to prevention efforts, thereby contributing to more effective mpox control strategies. Therefore, public health programs should prioritize efforts to improve self-efficacy, focusing on education and risk awareness to increase confidence in preventive actions.

The study found that MSM with an education level of junior high school or below exhibited lower levels of self-efficacy. These findings are consistent with the demographic characteristics observed in previous studies of MSM with mpox [Du M, Zheng M, Liu J, et al. The prevalence of mpox and its association with sexual behavior among Chinese men who have sex with men in early August 2023. J Med Virol. Dec 2023;95(12):e29320. [CrossRef] [Medline]43,Zheng M, Du M, Yang G, et al. Lower rate of mpox vaccination hesitancy and medical consultation among Chinese men who have sex with men living with HIV in comparison with those living without HIV: a national observational study. Hum Vaccin Immunother. Dec 15, 2023;19(3):2290788. [CrossRef] [Medline]44]. Higher education levels may be associated with increased awareness of self-protection measures, which may contribute to higher self-efficacy and a reduction in risky behaviors [Wei L, Tian J, Guo M, et al. Trajectories of sexual risk behaviors and the associated factors among young men who have sex with men in China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:854616. [CrossRef] [Medline]45]. This underscores the potential effectiveness of educational interventions aimed at enhancing self-efficacy, particularly for individuals with lower education levels.

An interesting finding of this study is that the proportion of married MSM exhibiting high self-efficacy in mpox prevention was lower compared to their unmarried, divorced, or widowed counterparts, despite the lack of statistical significance (P>.05). This trend may be explained by the fact that unmarried, divorced, or widowed MSM tend to receive less familial support, which may drive them to be more proactive in seeking preventive and self-protective measures to avoid infection [Wu S, Zhu S, Yan X, et al. Willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine among HIV positive men who have sex with men in China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. Jan 10, 2023;23(1):64. [CrossRef] [Medline]46]. Previous studies have also shown that divorced or widowed MSM tend to have higher levels of mpox-related knowledge compared to married individuals [Zheng M, Chen W, Qian X, et al. Awareness of mpox-related knowledge among men who have sex with men in China. BMC Public Health. Mar 30, 2023;23(1):600. [CrossRef] [Medline]47], possibly because the latter may be less inclined to seek out information or self-protective behaviors related to mpox [Liu Z, Chen Y, Yao T, et al. Factors related to HIV testing frequency in MSM based on the 2011-2018 survey in Tianjin, China: a hint for risk reduction strategy. BMC Public Health. Oct 20, 2021;21(1):1900. [CrossRef] [Medline]48]. This observation warrants further exploration, as it may suggest that marital status could still influence self-efficacy in mpox prevention, albeit not significantly in this study.

Accurate measurement of self-efficacy is fundamental for developing effective mpox prevention strategies [Fisher WA, Fisher JD, Harman JJ. The information‐motivation‐behavioral skills model: a general social psychological approach to understanding and promoting health behavior. In: Social Psychological Foundations of Health and Illness. 2009. [CrossRef]49]. In this study, the mpox prevention self-efficacy scale was validated and demonstrated strong reliability, validity, and practical utility. Although the General Self-Efficacy Scale, originally developed by Schwarzer and Jerusalem [Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, editors. Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs. NFER-NELSON; 1995. URL: https:/​/www.​religiousforums.com/​data/​attachment-files/​2014/​12/​22334_285ebbd019ec89856493442b1b6f9154.​pdf [Accessed 2025-02-11] 50], is widely used due to its excellent internal consistency and test-retest reliability, it lacks the specificity required for assessing self-efficacy in the MSM population and in the context of mpox prevention, limiting its applicability in this context. Previous research on mpox predominantly has largely relied on isolated questions to assess self-efficacy, without employing a comprehensive or systematic scale tailored to the MSM community [Bakare D, Salako J, Sogbesan A, Olojede OE, Bakare AA. Assessment of the level of awareness, knowledge, and risk perception of community members about mpox infection in Nigeria. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. Apr 30, 2024;22(1):76-87. [Medline]51]. To fill this gap, this study designed and evaluated the mpox prevention self-efficacy scale specifically tailored for MSM. The scale offers a more precise tool for assessing self-efficacy and its related factors among MSM, providing valuable insights for future research and interventions aimed at improving mpox prevention strategies.

Univariate analysis revealed a significant negative association between age and mpox prevention self-efficacy, a relationship that remained significant in the multivariable regression model. These findings indicate that older MSM may exhibit lower levels of self-efficacy in mpox prevention compared to their younger counterparts (aged 18‐24 years). This association may be partially attributed to older MSM having reduced access to mpox-related information. Age has been identified as a key determinant of mpox-related knowledge [Jairoun AA, Al-Hemyari SS, Abdulla NM, et al. Awareness and preparedness of human monkeypox outbreak among university student: Time to worry or one to ignore? J Infect Public Health. Oct 2022;15(10):1065-1071. [CrossRef] [Medline]52], with older individuals potentially having less exposure to relevant health information, which may contribute to lower awareness, confidence, and self-efficacy in preventing mpox. In contrast, younger MSM, being more familiar with using the internet, are more likely to access mpox-related information. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that older MSM are less willing to change their sexual behavior compared to their younger counterparts [Chan ZYS, Chong SY, Niaupari S, et al. Receptiveness to monkeypox vaccines and public health communication strategies among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Singapore: cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative insights. Sex Transm Infect. Aug 19, 2024;100(6):362-367. [CrossRef] [Medline]37]. Specifically, older MSM are more likely to maintain risky sexual behaviors even after becoming aware of the health risks associated with mpox, highlighting the need for tailored interventions aimed at this population to enhance their self-efficacy in preventing mpox. Therefore, age-specific communication strategies should be considered in mpox prevention efforts, particularly targeting middle-aged and older MSM through effective media channels. Given that MSM extensively use the internet for socializing, seeking sexual partners, and accessing sexual health information [Holloway IW, Rice E, Gibbs J, Winetrobe H, Dunlap S, Rhoades H. Acceptability of smartphone application-based HIV prevention among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. Feb 2014;18(2):285-296. [CrossRef] [Medline]53,Zou H, Fan S. Characteristics of men who have sex with men who use smartphone geosocial networking applications and implications for HIV interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Sex Behav. May 2017;46(4):885-894. [CrossRef] [Medline]54], eHealth technologies have emerged as promising tools for delivering prevention interventions to this population [Carpenter KM, Stoner SA, Mikko AN, Dhanak LP, Parsons JT. Efficacy of a web-based intervention to reduce sexual risk in men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. Jun 2010;14(3):549-557. [CrossRef] [Medline]55]. Research has shown that enhanced behavioral interventions, such as tailored strategies, can lead to reductions in unprotected sex, while advanced eHealth technologies, including social media platforms, are associated with increased health screening in the MSM community [Xin M, Viswanath K, Li AYC, et al. The effectiveness of electronic health interventions for promoting HIV-preventive behaviors among men who have sex with men: meta-analysis based on an integrative framework of design and implementation features. J Med Internet Res. May 25, 2020;22(5):e15977. [CrossRef] [Medline]56]. Therefore, eHealth-based interventions, incorporating targeted communication strategies and educational tools, can be effectively implemented on widely used social platforms or websites to enhance mpox prevention self-efficacy, particularly in populations with lower levels of self-efficacy. Tailored interventions focusing on improving self-efficacy among older and less educated MSM may be particularly beneficial, as these groups tend to exhibit lower self-efficacy, which may increase their susceptibility to infection. These findings underscore the importance of demographic factors in informing targeted mpox prevention strategies, especially in guiding surveillance and health education practices.

This study found that mpox-related knowledge, perceived risk awareness, and risk perception were positively correlated with self-efficacy in mpox prevention. Previous research has demonstrated that attitudes towards a disease are closely linked to disease-related knowledge, suggesting that lower levels of knowledge among MSM are associated with more negative attitudes and decreased intentions to engage in mpox prevention behaviors [Opoku MP, Agyei-Okyere E, Nketsia W, Torgbenu EL, Kumi EO. Perceived self-efficacy of students and its influence on attitudes and knowledge about HIV/AIDS in Ghana. Int J Health Plann Manage. Mar 2022;37(2):755-769. [CrossRef] [Medline]57]. Mpox perceived risk awareness reflects beliefs about the potential harm or likelihood of mpox in their surroundings, while risk perception represents a subjective judgment of personal susceptibility to the disease. According to social cognitive theory, individuals who recognize the severity of a negative health condition, believe that it can be avoided, maintain a positive attitude toward recommended actions, and have confidence in their ability to successfully execute these actions are more likely to engage in health-related behaviors [Khumsaen N, Stephenson R. Beliefs and perception about HIV/AIDS, self-efficacy, and HIV sexual risk behaviors among young Thai men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. Apr 2017;29(2):175-190. [CrossRef] [Medline]22,Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(2):175-183. [CrossRef] [Medline]58]. Therefore, mpox prevention efforts among MSM should include further public health education and training to enhance perceived risk awareness, provide targeted risk communication, and ensure the privacy and confidentiality of services, which are crucial for effective mpox prevention within this population.

This research has several strengths. First, as one of the earliest studies in China examining mpox prevention self-efficacy among MSM, the findings carry significant public health implications for the prevention and control of mpox outbreaks in the country, while also enhancing the psychological and behavioral well-being of the MSM community. Furthermore, the study’s multicenter design contributes to the generalizability of the results, as it incorporates a diverse sample from various regions across China.

Limitations

Despite the valuable insights provided by the study, several limitations must be acknowledged. First, participant recruitment was facilitated by government centers for disease control departments and NGOs using a snowball sampling method, which was used to improve the efficiency of identifying and recruiting members of the hidden MSM population [Kendall C, Kerr L, Gondim RC, et al. An empirical comparison of respondent-driven sampling, time location sampling, and snowball sampling for behavioral surveillance in men who have sex with men, Fortaleza, Brazil. AIDS Behav. Jul 2008;12(4 Suppl):S97-104. [CrossRef] [Medline]59]. Although this approach is effective for accessing hard-to-reach groups, it inherently introduces selection bias, as the sample composition is influenced by the characteristics of initial recruits (seeds) and the subsequent limited recruitment chains. Consequently, this may restrict the generalizability of our findings. Second, the sensitive nature of some inquiries, combined with self-reported data, may lead to information bias. Third, the cross-sectional design restricts the ability to infer causality, highlighting the need for future longitudinal studies to further explore the temporal relationships between mpox-related knowledge, perceived risk awareness, risk perception, and self-efficacy. Such prospective research could also evaluate the impact of targeted interventions aimed at enhancing self-efficacy in mpox prevention among MSM.

Conclusion

This study examined the mpox prevention self-efficacy of MSM and its influencing factors, based on the design and evaluation of the mpox prevention self-efficacy scale. The findings demonstrated significant associations between mpox prevention self-efficacy and sociodemographic characteristics, as well as mpox-related factors. These results underscore the importance of targeted interventions to enhance mpox prevention self-efficacy, particularly through efforts to increase mpox-related knowledge, perceived risk awareness, and risk perception. Special attention should be given to middle-aged and older MSM, who may experience a decline in self-efficacy. Future research should adopt longitudinal designs to better understand the temporal relationships between self-efficacy and related factors, thereby providing more robust evidence to guide the development of effective mpox prevention strategies. Ultimately, these efforts are crucial for improving mpox prevention outcomes and promoting the overall health of the MSM community.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Shanghai Qingai Health Center (Shanghai), Trans China (Yunnan), Consultation Center of AIDS Aid and Health Service (Liaoning), Xinjiang Rong’ai Health Consulting Co Ltd (Xinjiang), Lingnan Partners Community Support Center (Guangdong), and Xi’an Zhitong AIDS Prevention and Health Center (Shaanxi) for their contributions to data collection. We also extend our thanks to all the participants involved in this study. This study was funded by Key discipline projects of Shanghai Three-Year Action Plan for Public Health under Grant (GWVI-11.1-29), Public Health Research Project from Shanghai Disease Control and Prevention Administration (2024GKM30), Changning District Medical and Health Research Special Project (CNKW2022Y08), Tongren Hospital Talent Launch Project (TR2023rc11, TR2024RC10), Science and Technology Commission Shanghai Municipality (number 20JC1410204) for the Seroepidemiological Study of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia in Key Populations, national health commission of the PRC (grant number Z155080000004), and the Research Fund of Shanghai Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine (TRYJ2024LC13, TRYJ2022LC10).

Data Availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during this study are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical considerations, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors' Contributions

QG and SL performed the analyses, interpreted the data, and developed the manuscript; MT and HX conceptualized and validated data analyses; JZ and GX contributed to the data collection and provided critical insights into the methodology; JC reviewed and edited the manuscript; YC, FH, and YW designed and supervised this study, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have made a significant contribution to this study.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Multimedia Appendix 1

Independent samples t test discrimination results of the mpox prevention self-efficacy scale (N=2403).

DOC File, 18 KB

Multimedia Appendix 2

Results of collinearity diagnosis for the multivariable logistic regression analysis of mpox prevention self-efficacy among MSM in 6 Chinese cities (N=2403), from a survey conducted from October 2023 to March 2024.

DOC File, 18 KB

Multimedia Appendix 3

Standardized one-factor structural model of the mpox prevention self-efficacy scale (n=1225).

PNG File, 101 KB

  1. Lu J, Xing H, Wang C, et al. Mpox (formerly monkeypox): pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment. Signal Transduct Target Ther. Dec 27, 2023;8(1):458. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  2. Mpox (monkeypox) outbreak. World Health Organization. 2022. URL: https://www.who.int/emergencies/situations/monkeypox-oubreak-2022 [Accessed 2024-08-20]
  3. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing following the IHR emergency committee meeting on the upsurge of mpox 2024-14. World Health Organization. 2024. URL: https:/​/www.​who.int/​zh/​director-general/​speeches/​detail/​who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-following-the-ihr-emergency-committee-meeting-on-the-upsurge-of-mpox-2024---14-august-2024 [Accessed 2024-08-20]
  4. 2022-24 mpox (monkeypox) outbreak: global trends. World Health Organization. 2024. URL: https://worldhealthorg.shinyapps.io/mpx_global/ [Accessed 2024-08-20]
  5. Vaughan AM, Cenciarelli O, Colombe S, et al. A large multi-country outbreak of monkeypox across 41 countries in the WHO European Region, 7 March to 23 August 2022. Euro Surveill. Sep 2022;27(36):2200620. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Hu M, Xu C, Wang J. Spatiotemporal analysis of men who have sex with men in Mainland China: social app capture-recapture method. JMIR mHealth uHealth. Jan 24, 2020;8(1):e14800. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Notice of the General Office of the National Health Commission on the issuance of the Technical Guidelines for Monkeypox Prevention and Control (2022 Edition) [Website in Chinese]. Gov.cn. 2022. URL: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-07/01/content_5698880.htm [Accessed 2024-09-22]
  8. Chen HJ, Tang HL, Li PL, et al. Survey on the awareness rate of mpox knowledge and related factors among men who have sex with men in China [Article in Chinese]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. Apr 10, 2024;45(4):559-565. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist. 1982;37(2):122-147. [CrossRef]
  10. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy. Jan 1978;1(4):139-161. [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang C, Huang D, Goldsamt LA, et al. Self-efficacy mediates the effect of providing HIV self-testing kits on HIV testing frequency among Chinese men who have sex with men: results from a randomised controlled trial. Sex Health. Apr 2023;20(2):118-125. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Liu H, Lai G, Shi G, Zhong X. The influencing factors of HIV-preventive behavior based on health belief model among HIV-negative MSMs in Western China: a structural equation modeling analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Aug 17, 2022;19(16):10185. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  13. DiIorio C, Dudley WN, Kelly M, Soet JE, Mbwara J, Sharpe Potter J. Social cognitive correlates of sexual experience and condom use among 13- through 15-year-old adolescents. J Adolesc Health. Sep 2001;29(3):208-216. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Safren SA, Blashill AJ, Lee JS, et al. Condom-use self-efficacy as a mediator between syndemics and condomless sex in men who have sex with men (MSM). Health Psychol. Sep 2018;37(9):820-827. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  15. Luo S, Jiao K, Zhang Y, et al. Behavioral intention of receiving monkeypox vaccination and undergoing monkeypox testing and the associated factors among young men who have sex with men in China: large cross-sectional study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. Mar 19, 2024;10:e47165. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. Lawrence A. Assessing vaccine intentions, knowledge, self-efficacy, and trust: a cross-sectional study on perceptions of monkeypox vaccination and public health risk awareness in Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. Cureus. Oct 2024;16(10):e72131. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. Tan F, Oka P, Dambha-Miller H, Tan NC. The association between self-efficacy and self-care in essential hypertension: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. Feb 22, 2021;22(1):44. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. Wang SD, Loftus P, Pang RD, Kirkpatrick MG. Impact of self-efficacy on daily intention to not smoke. Addict Behav. Jul 2021;118:106877. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  19. Winters M, Malik AA, Omer SB. Attitudes towards Monkeypox vaccination and predictors of vaccination intentions among the US general public. PLoS One. 2022;17(12):e0278622. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Lee J, Lee EH, Chae D. Self-efficacy instruments for type 2 diabetes self-care: a systematic review of measurement properties. J Adv Nurs. Aug 2020;76(8):2046-2059. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  21. Takahashi LM, Magalong MG, Debell P, Fasudhani A. HIV and AIDS in suburban Asian and Pacific Islander communities: factors influencing self-efficacy in HIV risk reduction. AIDS Educ Prev. Dec 2006;18(6):529-545. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  22. Khumsaen N, Stephenson R. Beliefs and perception about HIV/AIDS, self-efficacy, and HIV sexual risk behaviors among young Thai men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. Apr 2017;29(2):175-190. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  23. Villegas Rodríguez N, Ferrer Lagunas LM, Cianelli Acosta R, Miner S, Lara Campos L, Peragallo N. Knowledge and self efficacy related with HIV prevention among Chilean women. Invest Educ Enferm. 2011;29(2):222-229. [Medline]
  24. Carter G, Brown L, Mahnke B, Ohmit A, Woodward B. Sexual communication self-efficacy and PrEP literacy helps to meet HIV prevention outcomes among Black and Latinx individuals. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022;13:21501319221099789. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. Black DS, Sun P, Rohrbach LA, Sussman S. Decision-making style and gender moderation of the self-efficacy-condom use link among adolescents and young adults: informing targeted STI/HIV prevention programs. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. Apr 2011;165(4):320-325. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  26. Lavallee S, Hynds PD, Brown RS, Majury A. Classification of sub-populations for quantitative risk assessment based on awareness and perception: a cross-sectional population study of private well users in Ontario. Sci Total Environ. Jan 20, 2023;857(Pt 3):159677. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  27. Gray-Scholz D, Haney TJ, MacQuarrie P. Out of sight, out of mind? Geographic and social predictors of flood risk awareness. Risk Anal. Nov 2019;39(11):2543-2558. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  28. Jiao K, Xu Y, Huang S, et al. Mpox risk perception and associated factors among Chinese young men who have sex with men: Results from a large cross-sectional survey. J Med Virol. Aug 2023;95(8):e29057. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  29. Wiedemann PM, Schütz H. The precautionary principle and risk perception: experimental studies in the EMF area. Environ Health Perspect. Apr 2005;113(4):402-405. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  30. Renner B, Schupp H, Vollmann M, Hartung FM, Schmälzle R, Panzer M. Risk perception, risk communication and health behavior change. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie. Jul 2008;16(3):150-153. [CrossRef]
  31. Li Y, Peng X, Fu L, et al. Monkeypox awareness and low vaccination hesitancy among men who have sex with men in China. J Med Virol. Feb 2023;95(2):e28567. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10969071/95/2 [Accessed 2025-02-03] [CrossRef]
  32. Huang X, Lin Z, Qin J, et al. Willingness to accept monkeypox vaccine and its correlates among men who have sex with men in Southern China: a web-based online cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1289918. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  33. Zheng M, Qin C, Qian X, et al. Knowledge and vaccination acceptance toward the human monkeypox among men who have sex with men in China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:997637. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  34. Gao Y, Liu S, Xu H, et al. The Mpox vaccine hesitancy scale for Mpox: links with vaccination intention among men who have sex with men in six cities of China. Vaccines (Basel). Sep 3, 2024;12(9):1009. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  35. Ravelo GJ, Sanchez M, Cyrus E, De La Rosa M, Peragallo N, Rojas P. Associations between gender norms and HIV self-efficacy among Latina immigrants in a farmworker community. Ethn Health. Jan 2022;27(1):27-39. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  36. Cianelli R, Ferrer L, Norr KF, et al. Mano a Mano-Mujer: an effective HIV prevention intervention for Chilean women. Health Care Women Int. 2012;33(4):321-341. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  37. Chan ZYS, Chong SY, Niaupari S, et al. Receptiveness to monkeypox vaccines and public health communication strategies among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men in Singapore: cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative insights. Sex Transm Infect. Aug 19, 2024;100(6):362-367. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  38. Bien-Gund CH, Shaw PA, Agnew-Brune C, et al. HIV self-testing and risk behaviors among men who have sex with men in 23 US cities, 2017. JAMA Netw Open. Dec 1, 2022;5(12):e2247540. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  39. Gellman M, Turner J. Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. 2013. [CrossRef] ISBN: 978-1-4419-1004-2
  40. Janz NK, Becker MH. The Health Belief Model: a decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984;11(1):1-47. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  41. Villegas N, Cianelli R, Gonzalez-Guarda R, Kaelber L, Ferrer L, Peragallo N. Predictors of self-efficacy for HIV prevention among Hispanic women in South Florida. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2013;24(1):27-37. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  42. Sheeran P, Maki A, Montanaro E, et al. The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. Nov 2016;35(11):1178-1188. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  43. Du M, Zheng M, Liu J, et al. The prevalence of mpox and its association with sexual behavior among Chinese men who have sex with men in early August 2023. J Med Virol. Dec 2023;95(12):e29320. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  44. Zheng M, Du M, Yang G, et al. Lower rate of mpox vaccination hesitancy and medical consultation among Chinese men who have sex with men living with HIV in comparison with those living without HIV: a national observational study. Hum Vaccin Immunother. Dec 15, 2023;19(3):2290788. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  45. Wei L, Tian J, Guo M, et al. Trajectories of sexual risk behaviors and the associated factors among young men who have sex with men in China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:854616. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  46. Wu S, Zhu S, Yan X, et al. Willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine among HIV positive men who have sex with men in China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. Jan 10, 2023;23(1):64. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  47. Zheng M, Chen W, Qian X, et al. Awareness of mpox-related knowledge among men who have sex with men in China. BMC Public Health. Mar 30, 2023;23(1):600. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  48. Liu Z, Chen Y, Yao T, et al. Factors related to HIV testing frequency in MSM based on the 2011-2018 survey in Tianjin, China: a hint for risk reduction strategy. BMC Public Health. Oct 20, 2021;21(1):1900. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  49. Fisher WA, Fisher JD, Harman JJ. The information‐motivation‐behavioral skills model: a general social psychological approach to understanding and promoting health behavior. In: Social Psychological Foundations of Health and Illness. 2009. [CrossRef]
  50. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, editors. Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs. NFER-NELSON; 1995. URL: https:/​/www.​religiousforums.com/​data/​attachment-files/​2014/​12/​22334_285ebbd019ec89856493442b1b6f9154.​pdf [Accessed 2025-02-11]
  51. Bakare D, Salako J, Sogbesan A, Olojede OE, Bakare AA. Assessment of the level of awareness, knowledge, and risk perception of community members about mpox infection in Nigeria. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. Apr 30, 2024;22(1):76-87. [Medline]
  52. Jairoun AA, Al-Hemyari SS, Abdulla NM, et al. Awareness and preparedness of human monkeypox outbreak among university student: Time to worry or one to ignore? J Infect Public Health. Oct 2022;15(10):1065-1071. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  53. Holloway IW, Rice E, Gibbs J, Winetrobe H, Dunlap S, Rhoades H. Acceptability of smartphone application-based HIV prevention among young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. Feb 2014;18(2):285-296. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  54. Zou H, Fan S. Characteristics of men who have sex with men who use smartphone geosocial networking applications and implications for HIV interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Sex Behav. May 2017;46(4):885-894. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  55. Carpenter KM, Stoner SA, Mikko AN, Dhanak LP, Parsons JT. Efficacy of a web-based intervention to reduce sexual risk in men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. Jun 2010;14(3):549-557. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  56. Xin M, Viswanath K, Li AYC, et al. The effectiveness of electronic health interventions for promoting HIV-preventive behaviors among men who have sex with men: meta-analysis based on an integrative framework of design and implementation features. J Med Internet Res. May 25, 2020;22(5):e15977. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  57. Opoku MP, Agyei-Okyere E, Nketsia W, Torgbenu EL, Kumi EO. Perceived self-efficacy of students and its influence on attitudes and knowledge about HIV/AIDS in Ghana. Int J Health Plann Manage. Mar 2022;37(2):755-769. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  58. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(2):175-183. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  59. Kendall C, Kerr L, Gondim RC, et al. An empirical comparison of respondent-driven sampling, time location sampling, and snowball sampling for behavioral surveillance in men who have sex with men, Fortaleza, Brazil. AIDS Behav. Jul 2008;12(4 Suppl):S97-104. [CrossRef] [Medline]


CFA: confirmatory factor analysis
CFI: comparative fit index
EFA: exploratory factor analysis
GFI: goodness-of-fit index
IFI: incremental fit index
MSM: men who have sex with men
NFI: normed fit index
NGO: nongovernmental organization
OR: odds ratio
RMSEA: root mean square error of approximation
SRMR: standardized root mean square residual
TLI: Tucker-Lewis index


Edited by Amaryllis Mavragani; submitted 07.11.24; peer-reviewed by Behzad Foroutan, Oluwabusayo Oni, Sitong Luo, Tolulope Funmilola Ojo; final revised version received 05.01.25; accepted 05.01.25; published 28.02.25.

Copyright

© Quyige Gao, Shangbin Liu, Muzaibaier Tuerxunjiang, Huifang Xu, Jiechen Zhang, Gang Xu, Jianyu Chen, Yong Cai, Fan Hu, Ying Wang. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 28.2.2025.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.