Published on in Vol 4, No 4 (2018): Oct-Dec

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at, first published .
Strategies to Increase Latino Immigrant Youth Engagement in Health Promotion Using Social Media: Mixed-Methods Study

Strategies to Increase Latino Immigrant Youth Engagement in Health Promotion Using Social Media: Mixed-Methods Study

Strategies to Increase Latino Immigrant Youth Engagement in Health Promotion Using Social Media: Mixed-Methods Study

Original Paper

1Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States

2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States

*these authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author:

Elizabeth Louise Andrade, MPH, DrPH

Department of Prevention and Community Health

Milken Institute School of Public Health

The George Washington University

950 New Hampshire Avenue, NW

Office 324

Washington, DC, 20052

United States

Phone: 1 202 994 3577


Background: Generating participant engagement in social media applications for health promotion and disease prevention efforts is vital for their effectiveness and increases the likelihood of effecting sustainable behavior change. However, there is limited evidence regarding effective strategies for engaging Latino immigrant youth using social media. As part of the Avance Center for the Advancement of Immigrant/Refugee Health in Washington, DC, USA, we implemented Adelante, a branded primary prevention program, to address risk factors for co-occurring substance use, sexual risk, and interpersonal violence among Latino immigrant adolescents aged 12 to 19 years in a Washington, DC suburb.

Objective: The objectives of this study were to (1) characterize Adelante participant Facebook reach and engagement and (2) identify post content and features that resulted in greater user engagement.

Methods: We established the Adelante Facebook fan page in October of 2013, and the Adelante social marketing campaign used this platform for campaign activities from September 2015 to September 2016. We used Facebook Insights metrics to examine reach and post engagement of Adelante Facebook page fans (n=743). Data consisted of Facebook fan page posts between October 1, 2013 and September 30, 2016 (n=871). We developed a 2-phased mixed-methods analytical plan and coding scheme, and explored the association between post content categories and features and a composite measure of post engagement using 1-way analysis of variance tests. P<.05 determined statistical significance.

Results: Posts on the Adelante Facebook page had a total of 34,318 clicks, 473 comments, 9080 likes or reactions, and 617 shares. Post content categories that were statistically significantly associated with post engagement were Adelante program updates (P<.001); youth achievement showcases (P=.001); news links (P<.001); social marketing campaign posts (P<.001); and prevention topics, including substance abuse (P<.001), safe sex (P=.02), sexually transmitted disease prevention (P<.001), and violence or fighting (P=.047). Post features that were significantly associated with post engagement comprised the inclusion of photos (P<.001); Spanish (P<.001) or bilingual (P=.001) posts; and portrayal of youth of both sexes (P<.001) portrayed in groups (P<.001) that were facilitated by adults (P<.001).

Conclusions: Social media outreach is a promising strategy that youth programs can use to complement in-person programming for augmented engagement. The Latino immigrant youth audience in this study had a tendency toward more passive social media consumption, having implications for outreach strategies and engagement measurement in future studies. While study findings confirmed the utility of social marketing campaigns for increasing user engagement, findings also highlighted a high level of engagement among youth with posts that covered casual, day-to-day program activity participation. This finding identifies an underexplored area that should be considered for health messaging, and also supports interventions that use peer-to-peer and user-generated health promotion approaches.

JMIR Public Health Surveill 2018;4(4):e71




Social media has numerous applications for health promotion and disease prevention efforts, and the benefits of using social media for public health communication have been documented [1-4]. Results of health promotion efforts delivered via social media or using digital technologies have demonstrated increases in health knowledge [5-7], have assisted users with chronic disease management [8], and have led to improvements in health-related practices [9,10]. The use of digital technologies, such as mobile phone-based interventions, has also achieved outcomes such as increased adherence to treatments and increased engagement with behavior change interventions [11]. Social media platforms have been highly useful for increasing peer, social, and emotional support [12-22] and for reaching marginalized and underserved audiences while also connecting low-literacy groups [23-32] to information and resources.

Generating participant engagement is vital for effective health promotion whereby, through captivating an audience’s attention, we can go beyond simply reaching an audience to influencing sustainable changes in health behaviors [33]. However, engagement is an understudied area, and there are gaps in the literature regarding strategies that lead to greater engagement, especially among underserved populations [34-37]. Research has indicated that participants are more likely to be engaged when there is connectivity and multiple points of contact between participant and program; participation is easy yet rewarding; and participants are interested in and identify with the messages being conveyed or a program’s brand [34]. Engagement of youth populations plays an integral role in healthy cognitive, social, and emotional development; can provide opportunities for the acquisition of skills and increased confidence; and can result in youth contributing to their communities [35-45].

Social media has many attributes that may potentially increase engagement for health promotion and disease prevention programs. First and foremost, social media is ubiquitous and can reach very large audiences, enabling broad dissemination of health information and messaging [46-49]. Social media messages can be highly personalized and tailored to the interests of specific audiences, including peer groups. Social networks can also be leveraged to further amplify dissemination, increase interaction with other users from a targeted group [47,50-53], and augment the credibility of information shared between known contacts [54,55]. Importantly, social media can be used to augment in-person programming to increase the effectiveness of health promotion programs seeking to change health-related behaviors [2,4,56-59].

Similar to the general public, youth populations appear to be amenable to receiving health-related information on social media [31,60-62]. Thus, understanding tactics that can increase engagement in health promotion programs for young audiences via social media will ensure effective use of this tool. Identifying predictors of social media engagement can guide the development of content and use of features that have high appeal for young audiences. Past research has identified some strategies for successful user engagement, including encouraging high levels of social media activity, individual user interaction, and interaction through posing questions or calls to action; using multimedia content; highlighting celebrity involvement; tagging users in posts; targeting messages to specific audiences; using strategic message framing; leveraging targeted outreach campaigns; using humor or shock appeals; and storytelling. However, few studies have focused on social media engagement for Latino immigrant adolescents [63-68].

Latino adolescents are an important and growing population in the United States. The United States Census Bureau estimated that, by 2050, Latinos will constitute 34% of the US adolescent population between the ages of 10 and 19 years [69]. Yet Latino adolescents continue to experience numerous health disparities, have more limited engagement in health promotion, and have lower rates of health care utilization [70-80]. Despite pervasive access to mobile technology and widespread use of social media by Latino adolescents, there is little evidence establishing the best ways to engage with this audience using social media, highlighting the importance of further exploration of this area [1,81-90]. The literature base exploring engagement through social media of Latino immigrants, a subgroup of Latinos who have more recently immigrated to the United States, is even more limited. The immigrant subgroup should be distinguished from Latino subgroups that have a more established presence in the United States, sometimes for generations. Recent immigrants tend to be harder to reach with health promotion programs, since they are more likely to experience a unique set of risk factors that contribute to health disparities [91-93]. Social media outreach has the potential to engage Latino immigrant adolescents in health promotion efforts, contributing to youth-centered initiatives that use tested engagement strategies and more meaningful experiences for this group of young people [38].


In this study, we explored Facebook engagement for a branded primary prevention intervention for Latino immigrant youth, called Adelante [94]. The study aims were to (1) characterize Adelante participant Facebook reach and engagement and (2) identify post features and content that resulted in greater user engagement. Ultimately, we sought to formulate predictors of user engagement that would inform future prevention programming and youth outreach strategies using social media.

Adelante Youth Intervention and Social Media

We developed and implemented the 4-year Adelante primary prevention program to address risk factors for co-occurring substance use, sexual risk, and interpersonal violence among Latino immigrant adolescents, aged 12 to 19 years, living in Langley Park, Maryland, a community close to Washington, DC [94]. Adelante was grounded in an adapted positive youth development (PYD) framework, using a multilevel, asset-based approach for risk prevention [95,96]. Adelante addressed the following PYD constructs: competence, confidence, connection, and contribution (detailed elsewhere) [94,97]. The Adelante intervention consisted of in-person youth and parent programming, case management for high-risk youth and their families, and a social marketing campaign [98]. Adelante also applied innovative engagement strategies, whereby in-person activities intersected with the Adelante social media network, and participants also created user-generated digital media content informed by the Adelante brand and a foundation laid by previous activities and research [94,97-103].

We applied social marketing and branding principles for the development and implementation of Adelante components that sought to engage participants in the Adelante brand and program, increase receptivity to prevention messages, and, ultimately, improve Latino adolescent risk-preventive attitudes, norms, and behaviors [104-106]. As part of the overall engagement strategy, we implemented a 1-year social marketing campaign [98] that incorporated digital and print media advertisements, social media outreach, and the creation of user-generated content in collaboration with Adelante youth ambassadors [102]. Given youths’ affinity for digital media, the Adelante program had an active social media presence as a strategy for disseminating prevention messages, engaging the target youth audience in the Adelante brand, and increasing peer-to-peer and peer-to-program connectivity.

This study built on previous research by using Facebook Analytics tools (Facebook, Inc, Menlo Park, CA, USA) to identify post content and features that were associated with higher engagement among fans of the Adelante program’s Facebook page. This study expanded our understanding of predictors of engagement that can be applied to future health promotion and disease prevention initiatives with similar Latino immigrant audiences.

Study Population

The study population comprised fans of the Adelante Facebook page, which predominantly included Latino immigrant adolescents aged 12 to 19 years. We recruited fans from the in-person Adelante program and their immediate social networks, which we implemented in the community of Langley Park, Maryland. Langley Park is a low-income, mostly foreign-born (67.6%) Latino (80%) community [107]. A recent study by Cleary and colleagues estimated that, among adolescent Latinos aged 12 to 17 years, 66% were recently arrived immigrants, having lived in the United States for 3 years or less, with a large representation from El Salvador (46.53%), Guatemala (32.86%), and Honduras (10.41%; SC, unpublished data, 2017).

Adelante Program Facebook Fan Page

The Adelante Facebook fan page was established in October 2013, and the Adelante social marketing campaign used this platform for a portion of the campaign’s activities from September 2015 to September 2016. We used the fan page for ongoing program-related posts, such as recruiting for programs or events; showcasing programmatic activities; disseminating information about social issues or initiatives; sharing information about health, social services, or educational resources and opportunities; and providing opportunities for Adelante staff or peers to provide social support to participants. The social marketing campaign disseminated health-risk and prevention information via social media (related to substance use, sexual risk, and interpersonal violence), and sought to further engage youth through targeted outreach and messaging using advertisements and user-generated video content that featured Adelante youth; contests; highlights of youth stories and achievements; and links to news stories of interest, websites, blog posts, and other resources. We also occasionally boosted posts to explore the utility of this strategy for increasing reach and engagement.

Data Collection and Metrics

Data for this study consisted of Facebook posts on the Adelante fan page between October 1, 2013 and September 30, 2016. We used Facebook Insights metrics to examine the reach and post engagement of Adelante Facebook page fans. Metrics for reach were number of page fans, number of posts, total reach, organic reach, and paid reach. Facebook defines reach as “the number of unique people who see a post” and engagement as “reacting to, sharing, or commenting or clicking on any content” [108]. Paid reach refers to the number of unique people who see a post as a result of advertisements, whereas organic reach does not involve advertisements. We created a composite post engagement dependent variable by summing post clicks, reactions, comments, and shares. Adelante research methods and protocols underwent the George Washington University Institutional Review Board review and approval process for the protection of human subjects (study number 111139; Washington, DC, USA).

Data Analysis

We developed a 2-phased mixed-methods analysis plan that enabled us to combine quantitative Facebook analytics and assessment of post features with qualitative data from Facebook posts (text, media, and graphics). We exported Facebook data into an Excel database version 2013 (Microsoft Corporation) using NCapture (QSR International Pty Ltd). In phase 1, we coded the data quantitatively using a coding scheme that assigned numeric values to post features, such as purpose of the post or language used (Spanish, English, or both; Table 1). In phase 2, we qualitatively coded post text and media, as well as text and media of external links included in the post.

Table 1. Post content and features coding scheme (phases 1 and 2).
Phase and contentFeatures
Phase 1

Language usedEnglish, Spanish, bilingual

Post tonePositive, negative

Purpose of postProgram announcement, program activity sharing, health or social service promotion, internship or educational opportunity advertisements, health education or promotion, contest, youth achievement or story highlight, news story sharing, awareness raising or social issue advocating, and campaign messaging
Phase 2

Prevention topicSexual health: sexually transmitted diseases, pregnancy and birth control, safe sex (condom use, abstinence), risk prevention; violence: partner violence, bullying, peer violence or fighting, risk prevention; substance abuse: factual information, risks of substance use, risk prevention; mental health: factual information, symptoms, sources of help, risk prevention

Positive youth development framework constructConfidence; contribution (attitudes and action); competence (athletics, civic action, school, family, multicultural efficacy); connection (romantic partner, community, social and cultural, school, friends and peers, family)

People portrayedIndividuals or groups; gender (male, female, both male and female); adults and youth

Posts were coded according to prevention topic, PYD construct, people portrayed in the post, and whether the post was boosted or not (Table 1). For the qualitative coding, we used NVivo software version 16 (QSR International Pty Ltd). After qualitative coding was complete, we used NVivo software to convert qualitative coding to a quantitative format. We then combined this quantitative dataset with the quantitative dataset from phase 1 for analysis.

Following data coding, we examined the distribution for the post engagement dependent variable and all independent variables. All variables were not normally distributed but did have a similar pattern (or shape) of distribution. Given the nonnormal distribution, and with all of the assumptions being met, we decided to use the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test to identify statistically significantly different median scores between groups (yes or no for a particular post content or feature) for post content category or feature (dichotomous independent variables) by post engagement (continuous dependent variable). We conducted the analysis using IBM SPSS version 19 (IBM Corporation). P<.05 determined statistical significance.

The Adelante Facebook page reached a total of 743 fans with 871 posts. The total reach was 247,212 users, including an organic reach of 163,698 unique users (representing 850 posts) and a paid reach of 83,514 unique users (representing 21 posts). A total of 213 posts were made as a part of the 1-year social marketing campaign. Regarding overall engagement metrics, there were 34,318 post clicks, 473 post comments, 9080 post likes or reactions, and 617 post shares.

As Table 2 shows, posts that provided updates about program activities that had occurred recently garnered a lot of interest from Adelante Facebook fans. These posts tended to occur during, or immediately following, program activities, and the posts usually contained photos of youth participating in group activities that were facilitated by an adult. The images in program update posts also portrayed youth enjoying time with their peers in groups of male and female youth, which reflects scenarios of how youth in the study community most commonly socialize. Statistically significant differences in engagement for posts targeting PYD constructs of connection-peer and competence-physical activity can be explained by youths’ interest in a highly popular program activity—soccer teams and tournaments—which were promoted on social media (Table 3). Fans were also interested in seeing youth participating in career workshops and internships (competence-workplace) and youth contributing to their communities through volunteering or community cleanups (contribution-action). Posts that showcased Adelante youths’ personal stories and achievements were also engaging to Facebook fans.

Posts that were part of the Adelante social marketing campaign were also engaging to youth. These posts often contained photos, videos, and branded advertisements that portrayed local Adelante youth, whom participants knew firsthand, thus likely increasing youth interest. These posts also included content that promoted PYD-informed messages, and disseminated information related to health promotion and risk prevention. The most engaging topics included in posts were substance abuse prevention (a main focus of the Adelante program), safe sex and sexually transmitted disease prevention, and violence prevention—specifically, fighting. Topics that were less engaging were mental health, pregnancy prevention, bullying, and partner violence, which are very surprising given our experience working with this population.

Table 2. Results: post content variables and user engagement.
Post content (independent variable)Posts, n (%)P value (dependent variable)
Post purpose

Program announcement or reminder229 (26.3).53

Program updates235 (27.0)<.001

Service or resource promotion89 (10.2).17

Health education or promotion93 (10.7).52

Contest32 (3.7).32

Youth Achievement showcase49 (5.6).001

News link92 (10.6)<.001

Social issue awareness raising143 (16.4).79

Campaign post213 (24.4)<.001
Prevention topic

Substance abuse73 (8.4)<.001

Mental health46 (5.3).10

Safe sex30 (3.4).02

Sexually transmitted diseases24 (2.8)<.001

Pregnancy prevention31 (3.6).11

Violence-bullying29 (3.3).40

Violence-fighting13 (1.5).047

Violence-partner15 (1.7).20
Positive youth development framework constructs

Competence173 (19.9).31

Competence-physical activity30 (3.4).005

Competence-school24 (2.8).50

Competence-workplace40 (4.6).003

Confidence172 (19.7)<.001

Connection365 (41.9)<.001

Connection-family38 (4.4).22

Connection-peer184 (21.1)<.001

Contribution87 (10.0).87

Contribution-action33 (3.8).04

Adelante program participants comprised a mixture of very recently immigrated adolescents to the United States and slightly less recently immigrated youth. Given the makeup of the study community and program participants, Adelante staff emphasized the importance of using a mixed-language strategy for social media outreach, which mirrored in-person programming. Youth Facebook fans tended to show more engagement with posts that were either bilingual or in Spanish. Program update posts and campaign-specific posts incorporated the use of both Spanish and English, and this approach appears to have resonated well with this audience. Interestingly, there was no difference in engagement between posts that had a positive tone and those that had a negative tone.

Table 3. Results: post feature variables and user engagement.
Post feature (independent variable)Posts, n (%)P value (dependent variable)
Multimedia content

Video88 (10.1).25

Photo574 (66.0)<.001

External link193 (22.2)<.001
Language used

English241 (27.7).56

Spanish171 (19.6)<.001

Bilingual380 (43.6).001
Post tone

Positive480 (55.1).001

Negative82 (9.4).001
People portrayed

Female only108 (12.4).05

Male only110 (12.6).43

Male and female254 (29.2)<.001

Group of youth342 (39.3)<.001

Individuals140 (16.1).61

Adults298 (34.2)<.001

Principal Findings

Social media use has become increasingly popular among young audiences, and Latino youth in the United States have been found to have nearly universal use of social media, making this method of communication essential for public health programs targeting this population [79,82]. Youth-oriented programs that incorporate social media outreach and engagement strategies extend beyond traditional in-person programming by opening a door to youth in the broader community who want and need health-related programming. This is particularly relevant for addressing health disparities among populations, such as recently arrived immigrants, who are more likely to be unaware of or disengaged from traditional health programming and potentially experience numerous barriers to participation.

Results for study aim 1 indicate that social media appears to be a useful tool for engaging Latino immigrant youth in health promotion programming. These levels of reach and engagement are on par with those seen in other studies examining health promotion efforts using social media [2,57-59,63-66]. Given that there are limited efforts targeting Latino immigrant adolescents through social media engagement, it is difficult to compare engagement observed in this study with that of other studies. However, this pilot effort serves as a starting point by which we can gauge reach and engagement of future efforts; it also provides guidance on content, features, and strategies to include in subsequent interventions. Despite the existence of numerous barriers to participation in traditional in-person programming, we were able to achieve a reasonable level of engagement through the Adelante Facebook page. This amplified the in-person programming, permitted the dissemination of branded prevention messages to youth, and combatted potential social, linguistic, and cultural isolation that this group of youth experiences through increased interaction with peers and program implementers in the Adelante digital network.

When characterizing social media consumption, Adelante youth Facebook fans tended to be more passive consumers of social media content, as opposed to active content contributors. Fans seemed more willing to interact with posts through clicks and likes but were potentially more hesitant to comment, share posts with their networks, or independently post user-generated content. This finding is consistent with other research and the phenomenon of “online identity management” described by Fergie et al, whereby youth described a complex vetting process to ensure that social media content they created was in line with their online persona [109]. Future youth programming should consider this finding and take steps to examine the concordance between youths’ personal brands and the established program brand, and how they intersect. Otherwise, this is a potential barrier for programs that ask youth to use their personal digital networks for dissemination of peer-to-peer prevention messages, such as the Living the Example youth ambassadors drug prevention program [110]. The more limited commenting and sharing by youth in our study may also indicate a potential hesitance among youth to be more actively engaged (sharing and commenting) on fan pages that are potentially viewable by a public audience. Future programs reaching high-risk youth populations should consider using Facebook closed groups instead of fan pages to increase the interactivity and engagement of youth in the group [111]. In contrast to our previous research with this population, which suggested that this audience would be interested in social media-based contests, contest-related posts did not produce significant user engagement. This may be explained by the audience’s patterns of passive social media consumption, discussed above. The contests sought to reward active engagement (likes or reactions, shares, comments, and user-generated content), but this call to action may have been incompatible with youth preferences of “lurking” on social media instead of engaging more actively. Future efforts should consider this potential tendency of passive social media consumption when determining programmatic targets and when deciding on mechanisms to increase engagement (eg, contests, posing questions, requesting post comments and shares, or use of closed groups).

Past research has identified some strategies for successful user engagement, including high sustained levels of social media activity [63] and targeted social media campaigns [64]. Results from study aim 2 highlighted that, for this audience, engagement was achieved both for posts that captured ongoing, day-to-day Adelante program activities and for planned, targeted social marketing campaign posts that featured local youth in campaign imagery. Building on this audience’s affinity for seeing themselves and their friends in posts, youth were more engaged in posts that highlighted program-related group activities that showed them and their friends having fun. These posts almost always included photos of program-related activities, which included interactive prevention workshops, academic tutoring, playing sports, user-generated video development, or being involved in other recreational activities. These posts also portrayed youth who were in the Facebook fans’ proximal peer networks and program activities taking place at familiar locations within their immediate community setting. The Adelante Facebook page served as a social extension of the in-person programming, where youth could see their friends and stay in touch. The success of certain post features, such as program updates or campaign posts, could be, in part, explained by the portrayal of recognizable youth from their community and school, and the use of local community visual imagery. For future efforts, we recommend collaboration with audience members in order to capture compelling imagery for posts and incorporation of audience-engaged content to result in higher engagement. We also recommend strategic incorporation of prevention messaging or other health promotion content into regular casual, habitual posts that keep participants connected with their friends. Furthermore, these findings bode well for interventions seeking to use peer-to-peer models for health promotion via social media.

Social media has also become an important mechanism for conveying health information, making audience engagement paramount for the utility of this strategy [5-7,31,47,60-62]. According to study aim 2 results, posts that resonated with this audience featured health and prevention information related to substance abuse, sexually transmitted disease prevention and safe sex, and violence prevention. Lack of engagement in certain topics, such as mental health and pregnancy prevention, was surprising, given that these topics were expressed as priorities by Adelante youth. Further analysis will be needed to explain diminished engagement for these topics. Regardless, we think that it is important for future efforts to carefully consider how health information can be packaged to increase the likelihood that young Latino immigrant audiences will consume this media and subsequently be exposed to the intended prevention messaging.

Our campaign formative research indicated that a mixed-language strategy would be the best option for this audience. For posts overall, Spanish-language and bilingual posts were more engaging than English-language posts, supporting our use of a mixed-language strategy, especially for communities that are diverse in terms of primary language spoken (English or Spanish) and have a large bilingual audience segment. Higher engagement with Spanish-language content for posts overall supports the finding from our formative research, where we were advised to “lean” toward more Spanish if we wanted to reach everyone, with the rationale that even English-dominant youth understand Spanish. Our prior research also suggested that the use of positive tone in posts would be more appealing to youth; however, we did not see any statistically significant differences in engagement between posts with a positive tone and posts with a negative tone.


The findings of this study should be interpreted in view of its limitations. Adelante intervention participants were predominantly Central American immigrants between the ages of 12 and 19 years living in a low-income, majority foreign-born, and Latino community. While study results are likely useful for research with other Latino adolescent subgroups, results may not necessarily be generalizable to these groups. Furthermore, while a sizeable proportion of Adelante Facebook fans were known participants in the program, some fans were not; it is possible that some fans who were engaged through social media outreach were not from our target audience in terms of geographic location, exact age group, or ethnicity.

Results should also be interpreted within the constraints of the study’s design; this social media outreach effort was a pilot demonstration, not a study of intervention outcomes. Thus, with no comparison group or behavioral measures, we are limited in the attribution of campaign effects and in the ability to determine health behavior change beyond initial engagement. Furthermore, youth from the target audience were users of numerous social media platforms, including Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter, and Kik Messenger, to name a few. The Adelante program did also cross-promote messages across platforms, particularly on Instagram and Twitter; however, this study examined only Facebook posts, which is likely an underrepresentation of audience engagement with overall Adelante social media outreach efforts.


Results from this study indicated that the use of social media is a promising strategy for engaging young Latino immigrants in health promotion efforts. Through gaining an understanding of what post content and features are most appealing to young Latino audiences, social media outreach programmers can offer multiple opportunities for addressing health disparities among populations with additional barriers to engagement. Social media habits that include more passive consumption of posts should be considered when conceptualizing future social media outreach strategies and developing measures of engagement that are appropriate for these passive consumption habits. Interventions should consider approaches that can increase participant comfort with more active engagement, such as augmenting privacy through closed social media groups for certain activities where active engagement is sought. Additionally, social media prevention messages and posts should be created in collaboration with community youth, increasing the likelihood that the messages will resonate with this audience and will be compatible with youths’ social media engagement habits. This approach would also be more likely to result in posts with content and features that are most engaging for the intended audience.

The literature describes many efforts that seek to disseminate health-related messaging and engage audiences through formal social marketing campaigns. While our study confirmed the utility of campaign posts for youth engagement, our study also highlighted the high level of appeal of posts that covered more casual, day-to-day activities of program youth. Youth were particularly interested in social media posts insofar as they were an extension of the in-person programming: the youth could see the activities that were happening, see photos of themselves or their friends, and feel like part of this peer network. We recommend that programs include online efforts that intersect with in-person programming as a strategy to augment youth engagement. This is a relatively unexplored area that public health practitioners may consider as a mechanism for disseminating health promotion and risk prevention messaging.


This study was supported by grant number 1P20MD006898-01 to The George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Department of Prevention and Community Health (Principal Investigator: Mark Edberg) from the US National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

  1. Maher CA, Lewis LK, Ferrar K, Marshall S, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Vandelanotte C. Are health behavior change interventions that use online social networks effective? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(2):e40 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  2. Laranjo L, Arguel A, Neves AL, Gallagher AM, Kaplan R, Mortimer N, et al. The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015 Jan;22(1):243-256. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  3. Balatsoukas P, Kennedy CM, Buchan I, Powell J, Ainsworth J. The role of social network technologies in online health promotion: a narrative review of theoretical and empirical factors influencing intervention effectiveness. J Med Internet Res 2015;17(6):e141 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Korda H, Itani Z. Harnessing social media for health promotion and behavior change. Health Promot Pract 2013 Jan;14(1):15-23. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. Bennett GG, Glasgow RE. The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health 2009;30:273-292. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  6. Evers KE, Prochaska JM, Prochaska JO, Driskell M, Cummins CO, Velicer WF. Strengths and weaknesses of health behavior change programs on the internet. J Health Psychol 2003 Jan;8(1):63-70. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Portnoy DB, Scott-Sheldon LAJ, Johnson BT, Carey MP. Computer-delivered interventions for health promotion and behavioral risk reduction: a meta-analysis of 75 randomized controlled trials, 1988-2007. Prev Med 2008 Jul;47(1):3-16 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Neville R, Greene A, McLeod J, Tracey A, Surie J. Mobile phone text messaging can help young people manage asthma. BMJ 2002 Sep 14;325(7364):600 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  9. Norman CD, Maley O, Li X, Skinner HA. Using the internet to assist smoking prevention and cessation in schools: a randomized, controlled trial. Health Psychol 2008 Nov;27(6):799-810. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Whittaker R, Maddison R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Denny S, Dorey E, et al. A multimedia mobile phone-based youth smoking cessation intervention: findings from content development and piloting studies. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(5):e49 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, Edwards P, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med 2013;10(1):e1001362 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Farmer AD, Bruckner HCEM, Cook MJ, Hearing SD. Social networking sites: a novel portal for communication. Postgrad Med J 2009 Sep;85(1007):455-459. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  13. Lupiáñez-Villanueva F, Mayer MA, Torrent J. Opportunities and challenges of Web 2.0 within the health care systems: an empirical exploration. Inform Health Soc Care 2009 Sep;34(3):117-126. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  14. Moen A, Smørdal O, Sem I. Web-based resources for peer support - opportunities and challenges. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;150:302-306. [Medline]
  15. Nordqvist C, Hanberger L, Timpka T, Nordfeldt S. Health professionals' attitudes towards using a Web 2.0 portal for child and adolescent diabetes care: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(2):e12 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. Ahmed OH, Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG, McCrory P. iSupport: do social networking sites have a role to play in concussion awareness? Disabil Rehabil 2010;32(22):1877-1883. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. Takahashi Y, Uchida C, Miyaki K, Sakai M, Shimbo T, Nakayama T. Potential benefits and harms of a peer support social network service on the internet for people with depressive tendencies: qualitative content analysis and social network analysis. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(3):e29 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. Colineau N, Paris C. Talking about your health to strangers: understanding the use of online social networks by patients. New Rev Hypermedia Multimedia 2010 Apr;16(1-2):141-160. [CrossRef]
  19. Selby P, van Mierlo T, Voci SC, Parent D, Cunningham JA. Online social and professional support for smokers trying to quit: an exploration of first time posts from 2562 members. J Med Internet Res 2010;12(3):e34 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. O'Dea B, Campbell A. Healthy connections: online social networks and their potential for peer support. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;168:133-140. [Medline]
  21. Setoyama Y, Yamazaki Y, Namayama K. Benefits of peer support in online Japanese breast cancer communities: differences between lurkers and posters. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(4):e122 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  22. Van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Smit WM, Bernelot MHJ, Van de Laar MAFJ. Determinants of engagement in face-to-face and online patient support groups. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(4):e106 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  23. Beard L, Wilson K, Morra D, Keelan J. A survey of health-related activities on second life. J Med Internet Res 2009;11(2):e17 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  24. Kontos EZ, Emmons KM, Puleo E, Viswanath K. Communication inequalities and public health implications of adult social networking site use in the United States. J Health Commun 2010;15 Suppl 3:216-235 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. Lariscy RW, Reber BH, Paek H. Examination of media channels and types as health information sources for adolescents: comparisons for black/white, male/female, urban/rural. J Broadcasting Electron Media 2010 Mar 04;54(1):102-120. [CrossRef]
  26. Egan KG, Moreno MA. Prevalence of stress references on college freshmen Facebook profiles. Comput Inform Nurs 2011 Oct;29(10):586-592 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  27. Egan KG, Moreno MA. Alcohol references on undergraduate males' Facebook profiles. Am J Mens Health 2011 Sep;5(5):413-420 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  28. Frimming RE, Polsgrove MJ, Bower GG. Evaluation of a health and fitness social media experience. Am J Health Educ 2013 Jan 23;42(4):222-227. [CrossRef]
  29. Lord S, Brevard J, Budman S. Connecting to young adults: an online social network survey of beliefs and attitudes associated with prescription opioid misuse among college students. Subst Use Misuse 2011;46(1):66-76 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  30. Ralph LJ, Berglas NF, Schwartz SL, Brindis CD. Finding teens in TheirSpace: using social networking sites to connect youth to sexual health services. Sex Res Soc Policy 2011 Feb 22;8(1):38-49. [CrossRef]
  31. Selkie EM, Benson M, Moreno M. Adolescents’ views regarding uses of social networking websites and text messaging for adolescent sexual health education. Am J Health Educ 2011 Dec;42(4):205-212 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  32. Veinot TC, Campbell TR, Kruger D, Grodzinski A, Franzen S. Drama and danger: the opportunities and challenges of promoting youth sexual health through online social networks. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2011;2011:1436-1445 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  33. Kite J, Foley BC, Grunseit AC, Freeman B. Please like me: Facebook and public health communication. PLoS One 2016;11(9):e0162765 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  34. Evans WD. Social Marketing Research for Global Public Health: Methods and Technologies. London, UK: Oxford University Press; 2016.
  35. Cole-Lewis H, Kershaw T. Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease prevention and management. Epidemiol Rev 2010;32:56-69 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  36. Cornelius JB, St Lawrence JS. Receptivity of African American adolescents to an HIV-prevention curriculum enhanced by text messaging. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2009 Apr;14(2):123-131 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  37. Wu Y, Stanton BF, Galbraith J, Kaljee L, Cottrell L, Li X, et al. Sustaining and broadening intervention impact: a longitudinal randomized trial of 3 adolescent risk reduction approaches. Pediatrics 2003 Jan;111(1):e32-e38. [Medline]
  38. Norman CD, Yip AL. eHealth promotion and social innovation with youth: using social and visual media to engage diverse communities. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012;172:54-70. [Medline]
  39. Camino LA. Youth-adult partnerships: entering new territory in community work and research. Appl Dev Sci 2000 Jun;4(sup1):11-20. [CrossRef]
  40. Zeldin S, Camino L, Mook C. The adoption of innovation in youth organizations: creating the conditions for youth-adult partnerships. J. Community Psychol 2004 Jan;33(1):121-135. [CrossRef]
  41. Barber T. Participation, citizenship, and well-being. Young 2009 Feb;17(1):25-40. [CrossRef]
  42. Wang CC. Youth participation in Photovoice as a strategy for community change. J Community Pract 2006 Jan;14(1-2):147-161. [CrossRef]
  43. Youniss J, Mclellan JA, Su Y, Yates M. The role of community service in identity development. J Adolesc Res 2016 Jul 25;14(2):248-261. [CrossRef]
  44. Mahoney JL, Harris AL, Eccles JS. Organized activity participation, positive youth development, and the overscheduling hypothesis. Soc Policy Rep 2006 Dec 01;20(4):1-32. [CrossRef]
  45. Ramey HL, Busseri MA, Khanna N, Hamilton YN, Ottawa YNRA, Rose-Krasnor L. Youth engagement and suicide risk: testing a mediated model in a Canadian community sample. J Youth Adolesc 2010 Mar;39(3):243-258. [Medline]
  46. Ramanadhan S, Mendez SR, Rao M, Viswanath K. Social media use by community-based organizations conducting health promotion: a content analysis. BMC Public Health 2013;13:1129 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  47. Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res 2013;15(4):e85 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  48. Huang J, Kornfield R, Emery SL. 100 million views of electronic cigarette Youtube videos and counting: quantification, content evaluation, and engagement levels of videos. J Med Internet Res 2016 Mar 18;18(3):e67 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  49. Duggan M, Ellison NG, Lampe C, Lenhart A, Madden M. Social media update 2014. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2015 Jan 09.   URL: [accessed 2018-11-06] [WebCite Cache]
  50. Adams SA. Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of “web 2.0”: an inter-disciplinary literature and website review. Int J Med Inform 2010 Jun;79(6):391-400. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  51. Adams SA. Blog-based applications and health information: two case studies that illustrate important questions for consumer health informatics (CHI) research. Int J Med Inform 2010 Jun;79(6):e89-e96. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  52. Ahlqvist T, Bäck A, Heinonen S, Halonen M. Road‐mapping the societal transformation potential of social media. Foresight 2010 Aug 31;12(5):3-26. [CrossRef]
  53. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office of the Associate Director for Communication. The health communicator's social media tool kit. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011 Jul.   URL: [accessed 2018-11-06] [WebCite Cache]
  54. De Bruyn A, Lilien GL. A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence through viral marketing. Int J Mark Res 2008 Sep;25(3):151-163. [CrossRef]
  55. Thackeray R, Neiger BL, Hanson CL, McKenzie JF. Enhancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: use of Web 2.0 social media. Health Promot Pract 2008 Oct;9(4):338-343. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  56. Pagoto S, Waring ME, May CN, Ding EY, Kunz WH, Hayes R, et al. Adapting behavioral interventions for social media delivery. J Med Internet Res 2016;18(1):e24 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  57. Kernot J, Olds T, Lewis LK, Maher C. Effectiveness of a Facebook-delivered physical activity intervention for post-partum women: a randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Public Health 2013;13:518 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  58. Merchant G, Weibel N, Patrick K, Fowler JH, Norman GJ, Gupta A, et al. Click “like” to change your behavior: a mixed methods study of college students' exposure to and engagement with Facebook content designed for weight loss. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(6):e158 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  59. Bull SS, Levine DK, Black SR, Schmiege SJ, Santelli J. Social media-delivered sexual health intervention: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med 2012 Nov;43(5):467-474 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  60. Uhrig J, Bann C, Williams P, Evans WD. Social networking websites as a platform for disseminating social marketing interventions: an exploratory pilot study. Soc Mark Q 2010 Feb 26;16(1):2-20. [CrossRef]
  61. Royer HR, Fernandez-Lambert KM, Moreno MA. Formative research for the development of an interactive web-based sexually transmitted disease management intervention for young women. Comput Inform Nurs 2013 Sep;31(9):430-438. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  62. Hood JE, Friedman AL. Unveiling the hidden epidemic: a review of stigma associated with sexually transmissible infections. Sex Health 2011 Jun;8(2):159-170. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  63. Veale HJ, Sacks-Davis R, Weaver ER, Pedrana AE, Stoové MA, Hellard ME. The use of social networking platforms for sexual health promotion: identifying key strategies for successful user engagement. BMC Public Health 2015;15:85 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  64. Theiss SK, Burke RM, Cory JL, Fairley TL. Getting beyond impressions: an evaluation of engagement with breast cancer-related Facebook content. mHealth 2016 Nov 07;2:41-41. [CrossRef]
  65. Strekalova YA, Damiani RE. Message design and audience engagement with tobacco prevention posts on social media. J Cancer Educ 2018 Jun;33(3):668-672. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  66. Nguyen P, Gold J, Pedrana A, Chang S, Howard S, Ilic O, et al. Sexual health promotion on social networking sites: a process evaluation of The FaceSpace Project. J Adolesc Health 2013 Jul;53(1):98-104. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  67. Gough A, Hunter RF, Ajao O, Jurek A, McKeown G, Hong J, et al. Tweet for behavior change: using social media for the dissemination of public health messages. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2017 Mar 23;3(1):e14 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  68. Neiger BL, Thackeray R, Burton SH, Giraud-Carrier CG, Fagen MC. Evaluating social media's capacity to develop engaged audiences in health promotion settings: use of Twitter metrics as a case study. Health Promot Pract 2013 Mar;14(2):157-162. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  69. Colby SL, Ortman JM. Projections of the size and composition of the U.S. populationto 2060: population estimates and projections. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau; 2015 Mar.   URL: [accessed 2018-11-06] [WebCite Cache]
  70. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Reported tuberculosis in the United States, 2016. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2016.   URL: [WebCite Cache]
  71. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Surveillance Report: diagnoses of HIV infection among adults and adolescents, by area of residence, 2011--United States and 6 dependent areas. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2013.   URL: [WebCite Cache]
  72. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Asthma surveillance data. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2013.   URL: [WebCite Cache]
  73. Blackwell DL, Lucas JW, Clarke TC. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: national health interview survey, 2012. Vital Health Stat 10 2014 Feb(260):1-161 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  74. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States 2013: with special feature on prescription drugs, table 42. Hyattsville, MD: NCHS; 2014.
  75. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA 2014 Feb 26;311(8):806-814. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  76. Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin S, Ross J, Hawkins J, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 2009. MMWR Surveill Summ 2010 Jun 04;59(5):1-142 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  77. Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin S, Flint KH, Hawkins J, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 2011. MMWR Surveill Summ 2012 Jun 08;61(4):1-162 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  78. Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future, National Results on Adolescent Drug Use: Overview of Key Findings. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2011.
  79. Trejos-Castillo E, Vazsonyi AT. Risky sexual behaviors in first and second generation Hispanic immigrant youth. J Youth Adolesc 2008 Dec 13;38(5):719-731. [CrossRef]
  80. Moorman JE, Akinbami LJ, Bailey CM, Zahran HS, King ME, Johnson CA, et al. National surveillance of asthma: United States, 2001-2010. Vital Health Stat 3 2012 Nov(35):1-58 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  81. Vyas AN, Landry M, Schnider M, Rojas AM, Wood SF. Public health interventions: reaching Latino adolescents via short message service and social media. J Med Internet Res 2012 Jul 12;14(4):e99 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  82. Wong CA, Merchant RM, Moreno MA. Using social media to engage adolescents and young adults with their health. Healthc (Amst) 2014 Dec;2(4):220-224 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  83. Social media fact sheet. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2018 Feb 05.   URL: [accessed 2018-11-09] [WebCite Cache]
  84. Social media, social life: how teens view their digital lives. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media; 2012.   URL: [accessed 2018-11-06] [WebCite Cache]
  85. Landry M, Vyas A, Turner M, Glick S, Wood S. Evaluation of social media utilization by Latino adolescents: implications for mobile health interventions. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015 Sep 29;3(3):e89 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  86. McNab C. What social media offers to health professionals and citizens. Bull World Health Organ 2009 Aug;87(8):566 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  87. Martinez O, Wu E, Shultz AZ, Capote J, López RJ, Sandfort T, et al. Still a hard-to-reach population? Using social media to recruit Latino gay couples for an HIV intervention adaptation study. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(4):e113 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  88. Young SD, Szekeres G, Coates T. Sexual risk and HIV prevention behaviours among African-American and Latino MSM social networking users. Int J STD AIDS 2013 Aug;24(8):643-649 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  89. Ellis BH, Miller AB, Baldwin H, Abdi S. New directions in refugee youth mental health services: overcoming barriers to engagement. J Child Adolesc Trauma 2011;4(1):69-85. [CrossRef]
  90. Larsen B, Benitez T, Cano M, Dunsiger SS, Marcus BH, Mendoza-Vasconez A, et al. Web-based physical activity intervention for Latina adolescents: feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of the Niñas Saludables Study. J Med Internet Res 2018 May 09;20(5):e170 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  91. Edberg M, Cleary S, Vyas A. A trajectory model for understanding and assessing health disparities in immigrant/refugee communities. J Immigrant Minority Health 2010 Mar 20;13(3):576-584. [CrossRef]
  92. Chou WS, Prestin A, Lyons C, Wen K. Web 2.0 for health promotion: reviewing the current evidence. Am J Public Health 2013 Jan;103(1):e9-18. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  93. Norman CD, Skinner HA. Engaging youth in e-health promotion: lessons learned from a decade of TeenNet research. Adolesc Med State Art Rev 2007 Aug;18(2):357-69, xii. [Medline]
  94. Edberg MC, Cleary SD, Andrade EL, Evans WD, Simmons LK, Cubilla-Batista I. Applying ecological positive youth development theory to address health disparities in an immigrant Latino community. Health Promot Pract 2016 Apr 18;18(4):488-496. [CrossRef]
  95. Lerner RM. The positive youth development perspective: theoretical and empirical bases of a strengths-based approach to adolescent development. In: Lopez SJ, Snyder CR, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2012.
  96. Silbereisen RK, Lerner RM. Approaches to Positive Youth Development. London, UK: Sage Publications; 2007.
  97. Andrade EL, Cubilla IC, Sojo-Lara G, Cleary SD, Edberg MC, Simmons LK. Where PYD meets CBPR: a Photovoice program for Latino immigrant youth. J Youth Dev 2015 Jun 01;10(2):55-71. [CrossRef]
  98. Andrade EL, Evans WD, Barrett ND, Cleary SD, Edberg MC, Alvayero RD, et al. Development of the place-based Adelante social marketing campaign for prevention of substance use, sexual risk and violence among Latino immigrant youth. Health Educ Res 2018 Apr 01;33(2):125-144. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  99. Evans WD, Andrade E, Villalba R, Cubilla I, Rivera I, Edberg M. Turning the corner: development of the Adelante program brand for Latino youth. Social Mark Q 2015 Nov 03;22(1):19-33. [CrossRef]
  100. Andrade EL, Evans WD, Edberg MC, Cleary SD, Villalba R, Batista IC. Victor and Erika Webvonela: an innovative generation @ audience engagement strategy for prevention. J Health Commun 2015;20(12):1465-1472 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  101. Cubilla-Batista I, Andrade EL, Cleary SD, Edberg MC, Evans WD, Simmons LK, et al. Picturing Adelante. Soc Mark Q 2016 Aug;23(1):18-35. [CrossRef]
  102. Barrett N, Villalba R, Andrade E, Beltran A, Evans WD. Adelante ambassadors: using digital media to facilitate community engagement and risk prevention for Latino youth. J Youth Dev 2017 Dec 13;12(4):81-106. [CrossRef]
  103. Miller-Day M, Hecht ML. Narrative means to preventative ends: a narrative engagement framework for designing prevention interventions. Health Commun 2013 Oct;28(7):657-670. [CrossRef]
  104. Evans WD. Social Marketing: Global Perspectives, Strategies and Effects on Consumer Behavior. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science; 2016.
  105. Storey JD, Saffitz GB, Rimon JG. Social marketing. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008:435-464.
  106. Evans WD, Blitstein J, Vallone D, Post S, Nielsen W. Systematic review of health branding: growth of a promising practice. Transl Behav Med 2015 Mar;5(1):24-36 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  107. US Census Bureau. Quick facts: Langley Park CDP, Maryland.   URL: [accessed 2018-11-09] [WebCite Cache]
  108. Facebook Business. Post engagement. Menlo Park, CA: Facebook, Inc; 2018.   URL: https:/​/www.​​business/​help/​735720159834389?helpref=search&sr=6&query=engagement%20metrics [accessed 2017-11-03]
  109. Fergie G, Hunt K, Hilton S. Social media as a space for support: young adults' perspectives on producing and consuming user-generated content about diabetes and mental health. Soc Sci Med 2016 Dec;170:46-54 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  110. Evans W, Andrade E, Goldmeer S, Smith M, Snider J, Girardo G. The Living the Example social media substance use prevention program: a pilot evaluation. JMIR Ment Health 2017 Jun 27;4(2):e24. [CrossRef]
  111. van der Velden M, El Emam K. “Not all my friends need to know”: a qualitative study of teenage patients, privacy, and social media. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013 Jan 1;20(1):16-24 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

PYD: positive youth development

Edited by T Sanchez; submitted 10.11.17; peer-reviewed by N Bragazzi, W Menson; comments to author 05.12.17; revised version received 16.06.18; accepted 14.09.18; published 19.12.18


©Elizabeth Louise Andrade, W Douglas Evans, Nicole Barrett, Mark Cameron Edberg, Sean D Cleary. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (, 19.12.2018.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.