This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Reviews on Public Health Technology and Innovation (77) Innovations and Technology for Cancer Prevention and Screening (180) Descriptive Epidemiology and Population Size Estimates (122) Health Care Quality and Health Services Research (301) Vulnerable Populations in Health Research (148)

Published on in Vol 9 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/48150, first published .
Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Adherence to Fecal Occult Blood Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Adherence to Fecal Occult Blood Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Association Between Socioeconomic Status and Adherence to Fecal Occult Blood Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Authors of this article:

Zilin Luo1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Xuesi Dong1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Chenran Wang1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Wei Cao1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Yadi Zheng1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Zheng Wu1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Yongjie Xu1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Liang Zhao1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Fei Wang1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jibin Li1 Author Orcid Image ;   Jiansong Ren1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jufang Shi1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Wanqing Chen1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ni Li1, 2, 3 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (8) Tweetations (2) Metrics

Journals

  1. Li S, He Y, Liu J, Chen K, Yang Y, Tao K, Yang J, Luo K, Ma X. An umbrella review of socioeconomic status and cancer. Nature Communications 2024;15(1) View
  2. Romeo-Cervera P, Martín-Pozuelo J, Vanaclocha-Espí M, Pinto-Carbó M, Castán-Cameo S, Salas D, Molina-Barceló A. Analysing Inequalities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Using an Individual Socioeconomic Status Index. Cancers 2024;16(23):3940 View
  3. Martínez-Alfonso J, Sebastian-Valles F, Martinez-Vizcaino V, Jimenez-Olivas N, Cabrera-Majada A, De los Mozos-Hernando I, Cekrezi S, Martínez-Martínez H, Mesas A. Social Determinants of Health Screening Tools for Adults in Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review. JMIR Research Protocols 2025;14:e68668 View
  4. Ehmann A, Schütte E, Semmler J, Berger F, Bauer U, Schmitt K, Pfitzer C, Helm P. Key Factors of Adherence in Cardiological Follow-Up of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 2025;12(2):39 View
  5. Santolini G, Bongiovanni A, Abbondanzieri A, Ambrosone C, Bruno E, Schiariti E, De Angelis F, Flammini A, Formosa V, Mantia F, Marfurt C, Perra A. Hepar-C: A cross-sectional study investigating general population knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding hepatitis C screening in the Latium Region, Italy, October 2022 to May 2023. Public Health 2025;240:131 View
  6. Cazorla G, Redmond N, Lamouroux A, Boirot A, Rotily M, Addamiano M, Balamou C, Doukhi Z, Kaou M, Couranjou F, Delpierre C, Mancini J, Durand M, Galli A. Acceptability and implementation potential of colorectal cancer screening and health literacy training: A qualitative study among general practitioners in deprived areas. PLOS ONE 2025;20(2):e0317910 View
  7. Faludi Vargáné E, Ghanem A, Nguyen C, Pataki J, Szőllősi G, Nagy A. Influencing factors on attendance in cervical cancer screening among women with diabetes in Hungary: a cross-sectional study using European Health Interview Surveys 2009-2019. Frontiers in Oncology 2025;15 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Badiola I. Advances in Host Genetics and Microbiome in Colorectal Cancer-Related Phenotypes. View