This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Obesity and Nutrition as Public Health Problem (304) Prevention and Health Promotion (986) mHealth for Wellness, Behavior Change and Prevention (2871) Instruments and Questionnaires for Nutrition and Food Intake (166)

Published on in Vol 8, No 7 (2022): July

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/35898, first published .
Relationship Between Protein Intake in Each Traditional Meal and Physical Activity: Cross-sectional Study

Relationship Between Protein Intake in Each Traditional Meal and Physical Activity: Cross-sectional Study

Relationship Between Protein Intake in Each Traditional Meal and Physical Activity: Cross-sectional Study

Authors of this article:

Takae Shinto1 Author Orcid Image ;   Saneyuki Makino1 Author Orcid Image ;   Yu Tahara1 Author Orcid Image ;   Lyie Nitta1 Author Orcid Image ;   Mai Kuwahara1 Author Orcid Image ;   Ayako Tada2 Author Orcid Image ;   Nanako Abe2 Author Orcid Image ;   Mikiko Michie2 Author Orcid Image ;   Shigenobu Shibata1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (3) Tweetations (4) Metrics

    Original Paper

    1Department of Bioscience and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan

    2Asken Inc, Tokyo, Japan

    Corresponding Author:

    Shigenobu Shibata, PhD

    Department of Bioscience and Engineering

    Waseda University

    Wakamatsu-cho 2-2

    Shinjuku-ku

    Tokyo, 162-0056

    Japan

    Phone: 81 +81353697318

    Email: shibatas@waseda.jp


    Related ArticleThis is a corrected version. See correction statement in: https://publichealth.jmir.org/2022/8/e41460

    Background: Protein intake plays an important role in the synthesis and maintenance of skeletal muscles for the prevention of health risks. It is also widely known that physical activity influences muscle function. However, no large-scale studies have examined the relationship between daily dietary habits, especially the timing of protein intake, and daily physical activity.

    Objective: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to investigate how protein intake and composition (involving the 3 major nutrients protein, fat, and carbohydrate) in the 3 traditional meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) are associated with physical activity.

    Methods: Using daily dietary data accumulated in the smartphone food log app “Asken” and a web-based cross-sectional survey involving Asken users (N=8458), we analyzed nutrient intake and composition, as well as daily activity levels. As very few individuals skipped breakfast (1102/19,319 responses, 5.7%), we analyzed data for 3 meals per day.

    Results: Spearman rank correlation analysis revealed that breakfast and lunch protein intakes had higher positive correlations with daily physical activity among the 3 major macronutrients (P<.001). These findings were confirmed by multivariate logistic regression analysis with confounding factors. Moreover, participants with higher protein intake and composition at breakfast or lunch tended to exhibit significantly greater physical activity than those with higher protein intake at dinner (P<.001).

    Conclusions: Among the 3 macronutrients, protein intake during breakfast and lunch was closely associated with daily physical activity.

    JMIR Public Health Surveill 2022;8(7):e35898

    doi:10.2196/35898

    Keywords

    protein; dietary pattern; physical activity; chrononutrition 


    Maintaining and increasing muscle mass are critical for preventing various health risks, such as metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and sarcopenia [1-3]. In addition, protein intake is an effective factor for skeletal muscle synthesis and maintenance [4]. According to the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare in Japan, the recommended daily protein intake values for adult Japanese males and females are 65 g and 50 g, respectively [5]. Additionally, several studies in the United States and Japan have shown that average protein intake in adults was unevenly distributed across the 3 meals, with the lowest intake at breakfast and the highest intake skewed toward dinner [6,7]. This typical pattern of protein intake has been associated with a decline in muscle function, including grip strength and muscle mass [8-10]. A cross-over study reported significantly higher 24-h muscle protein synthesis rates when protein intake was evenly distributed with adequate consumption at each meal, rather than skewed toward the evening meal [11]. In particular, breakfast is the most commonly skipped meal of the day, yet it plays an important role in health [12-14]. Indeed, recent studies have shown that breakfast protein intake effectively induced muscle hypertrophy in humans and rodents [15,16]. Therefore, it is important to consider not only the total protein intake, but also the intake and composition at each meal for regulating muscle function. In addition, physical activities, such as exercise and strength training, are effective for maintaining and increasing muscle mass [17]. However, the precise relationship between daily eating habits, especially protein intake patterns, and physical activity remains unclear. Therefore, we hypothesized that breakfast protein would have a strong positive relationship with physical activity among nutrients or intake timing. We investigated the relationship between the intake and composition of nutrients (protein, fat, and carbohydrate) in 3 meals and physical activity in approximately 8000 users of the Asken mobile health app for dietary management. Since this is a health care app generally aimed at weight maintenance and weight loss, the users are likely to be highly health conscious. In fact, the percentage of those who skip breakfast in Japan is 12% [18], while in this study, it was as low as 5.7%. In addition, most people consume snacks, but due to data availability, the analysis in this survey focused on the 3 traditional meals. To our knowledge, no previous study has investigated the dietary pattern of 3 meals and physical activity in such a large population. Therefore, this study could potentially clarify the characteristics of physical activity in the daily dietary pattern of 3 meals, including breakfast, as well as the relationship between physical activity and protein intake.


    Study Participants and the Mobile Health App “Asken”

    This study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee on Research with Human Subjects at Waseda University (No. 2020-046), in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Moreover, informed consent was obtained from all individuals who participated in the study.

    “Asken” is a popular food log and food coaching app that has been downloaded over 6,000,000 times [19] and has persistently ranked in the top 3 for health app categories in Japan [20]. As most users (almost 95%) use this app for body weight reduction and female individuals might be more inclined to maintain body shape than male individuals, 70% of the app users were female. The app provides feedback on dietary content based on the Dietary Intake Standards for Japanese as determined by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. In this study, an online survey was conducted via the app, in addition to the available dietary records. The online survey was conducted in January 2021, and at the time of implementation, we announced that 200 people would be given 500 Japanese yen (approximately US $5) in a lottery. Since the app was not for clinical use and we did not ask for detailed information (eg, disease) from the participants, inclusion and exclusion criteria were not set when the online survey was conducted. The study participants included 8458 users of Asken (aged 10-80 years). As shown in Figure 1, we excluded those who gave contradictory or no responses for gender and BMI, those who did not consume breakfast daily, those whose dietary records were less than 9 days per month, and those who deviated from the normal distribution for dietary intake (using the 3-sigma method).

    ‎
    Figure 1. Flow of the study participants.
    View this figure

    The self-reported food logs accumulated in the app have been deemed reliable for research purposes [21]. A recent study reported that the median correlation coefficient between daily paper-based nutrient intakes and those obtained from Asken was approximately 0.8 in adult men and women [22]. In addition, the dietary data obtained in this study were comparable with data calculated from the National Nutrition Survey in Japan (NNSJ) [23] (Multimedia Appendix 1). These results suggest that the dietary data used in this study are reliable. However, the amount of daily protein was slightly higher, while the amounts of fat and carbohydrate were slightly lower compared with the NNSJ data (Multimedia Appendix 1).

    Questionnaire

    The online survey included 34 items involving personal characteristics (age, gender, and prefecture of residence), lifestyle habits like diet and sleep, physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire [IPAQ] short form), and personality assessment (Ten-Item Personality Inventory [TIPI]). Except for the physical activity and personality assessment, the other items were originally developed by us. In this study, “age,” “gender,” “physical activity (IPAQ short form),” and “frequency of breakfast intake” were used for analysis in the online survey. The questionnaire was designed to take approximately 15 minutes to complete.

    Dietary Data

    The dietary assessment was based on the average dietary records of each participant for approximately 1 month (January 2021). For each of the 3 traditional meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) and snacks, the intake included energy content (kcal), protein, fat, carbohydrate, sodium, potassium, cholesterol, fiber, and saturated lipids. Herein, the 3 major nutrients (ie, carbohydrate, fat, and protein) were evaluated. As timing information on snacks was lacking, data on snacks were not used for further analysis. To evaluate the compositions of the 3 macronutrients (% kcal), we converted the amount of intake (g) into the amount of energy. The calculation formulas are as follows:

    Protein composition (% kcal) = protein intake (g) × 4 (kcal/g) / total energy (kcal) × 100 (1)
    Fat composition (% kcal) = fat intake (g) × 9 (kcal/g) / total energy (kcal) × 100 (2)
    Carbohydrate composition (% kcal) = carbohydrate intake (g) × 4 (kcal/g) / total energy (kcal) × 100 (3)

    In addition, to emphasize the relationship between protein and physical activity, the participants were categorized into meal types according to the protein intake amount and composition in each meal. For example, in intake amount grouping, if participants consumed 20% of the daily protein intake during breakfast, 30% during lunch, and 50% during dinner, they were classified into the “dinner” group. On the other hand, for the composition type of protein intake, if participants consumed 20% of their energy during breakfast, 40% during lunch, and 30% during dinner, they were classified into the “lunch” group. The characteristics of each group are shown in Multimedia Appendix 2 and Multimedia Appendix 3. Moreover, weight, height, and frequency of recording were included in the dietary records, and these were also used in the multivariate logistic regression analysis.

    Physical Activity

    The IPAQ short form assessed the amount of physical activity in daily life [24]. Respondents were asked about the number of days and hours spent doing each of the following 3 types of activities during the last 7 days: vigorous-intensity activity, moderate-intensity activity, and walking. Based on IPAQ analysis guidelines [25], we calculated weekly physical activity (metabolic equivalents-minutes/week [MET-min/week]) using the following formulas:

    Walking MET-min/week = 3.3 × walking min × walking days (4)
    Moderate MET-min/week = 4.0 × moderate-intensity activity min × moderate-intensity days (5)
    Vigorous MET-min/week = 8.0 × vigorous-intensity activity min × vigorous-intensity days (6)
    Total physical activity MET-min/week = sum of walking + moderate + vigorous MET-min/week values (7)

    Data cleaning was performed according to previous guidelines [25]. These guidelines describe how to analyze data from the short and long versions of the IPAQ, which were obtained through interviews (telephone or interview) and self-administered questionnaires, and describe the procedures and data processing rules for both the short and long versions. The data processing included recoding of minimum values and truncation of data to improve data comparability.

    Statistical Analysis

    Correlation analysis was conducted using Spearman rank correlation analysis. Moreover, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate more detailed associations between dietary patterns and physical activity. A minimum sample size of 351 was required to have approximately 95% power to detect large effects at a significance level of .05 (G*Power, version 3.1.9.2; Universitat Kiel) in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The objective variable, physical activity per exercise intensity, was divided into the following 2 groups: inactive (below median) and active (above median). We then divided the participants into groups according to their protein intake patterns and analyzed the amount of physical activity for each group using the Mann-Whitney U test. These analyses were conducted considering the following 2 factors: intake and composition. All data were analyzed using SPSS version 27 (IBM Corp), and a P value <.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Data are expressed as mean (SD) for most variables and as median and quartile (Q; 1-3) for IPAQ data.


    Participant Characteristics

    From the obtained dietary records and questionnaires (19,319 responses), we excluded subjects for various reasons, and we eventually used the data of 8458 subjects (2321 male subjects and 6137 female subjects) in the present analysis (Figure 1). In particular, to focus on those who consume breakfast every day, we excluded about 5000 respondents, who made up the bulk of the excluded population. As this app has a gender gap among users, female individuals accounted for 73% of all participants in this analysis.

    The mean participant age was 44.3 (SD 12.7) years, and the BMI was 25.0 (SD 3.7) kg/m2 for males and 22.9 (SD 3.9) kg/m2 for females (Table 1). The total energy intake was 2084.8 (SD 320.5) kcal for males and 1637.8 (SD 262.5) kcal for females, and the amount of energy per meal was skewed toward dinner. The daily protein intake was 85.5 (SD 17.2) g in males and 69.3 (SD 14.3) g in females, which exceeded the recommended amount of protein per day for Japanese people, as proposed by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare in Japan [5]. Conversely, we observed that protein distribution was low during breakfast and skewed toward dinner, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies [6,7]. Indeed, there were significant differences in energy and protein intake comparing the 3 meals (energy: P<.001, protein: P<.001). In addition, the median amount of physical activity was 1257 (Q1-Q3 558-2346) MET-min/week. According to the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare in Japan, the standard for physical activity for individuals aged 18 to 64 years is 23 MET-h/week, that is, 1380 MET-min/week of physical activity at an intensity of ≥3 MET [26]. Therefore, the distribution of the amount of physical activity in the current participants was slightly below the established standard.

    Table 1. Characteristics of the participants.
    CharacteristicTotal (N=8458)Male (n=2321)Female (n=6137)
    Age (years), mean (SD)44.3 (12.7)49.6 (11.4)42.2 (12.5)
    BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD)23.5 (4.0)25.0 (3.7)22.9 (3.9)
    Total energy (kcal/d), mean (SD)1760.5 (343.5)2084.8 (320.5)1637.8 (262.5)
    Breakfast energy (kcal), mean (SD)389.6 (119.7)a440.8 (129.8)a370.2 (109.5)a
    Lunch energy (kcal), mean (SD)542.2 (128.7)630.3 (133.1)508.8 (109.9)
    Dinner energy (kcal), mean (SD)609.1 (191.6)780.8 (185.6)544.2 (148.9)
    Total protein intake (g/d), mean (SD)73.8 (16.8)85.5 (17.2)69.3 (14.3)
    Breakfast protein (g/d), mean (SD)16.9 (6.8)a19.1 (7.4)a16.1 (6.4)a
    Lunch protein (g/d), mean (SD)22.3 (6.2)25.2 (6.5)21.2 (5.7)
    Dinner protein (g/d), mean (SD)28.2 (8.0)34.1 (8.0)25.9 (6.7)
    Total fat intake (g/d), mean (SD)53.1 (13.1)62.7 (12.9)49.4 (11.2)
    Breakfast fat (g/d), mean (SD)12.3 (5.2)a13.9 (5.6)a11.7 (4.9)a
    Lunch fat (g/d), mean (SD)18.4 (5.8)21.1 (6.2)17.3 (5.2)
    Dinner fat (g/d), mean (SD)22.4 (7.6)27.7 (7.5)20.4 (6.6)
    Total carbohydrate intake (g/d), mean (SD)185.9 (44.5)219.0 (46.1)173.4 (36.9)
    Breakfast carbohydrate (g/d), mean (SD)53.0 (18.0)a59.5 (20.1)a50.6 (16.5)a
    Lunch carbohydrate (g/d), mean (SD)69.4 (18.2)81.0 (19.3)65.1 (15.7)
    Dinner carbohydrate (g/d), mean (SD)63.4 (22.7)78.5 (24.0)57.7 (19.2)
    Total PAb (METc-min/week), median (Q1-Q3)1257 (558-2346)1470 (720-2612)1164 (495-2232)
    Vigorous PA (MET-min/week), median (Q1-Q3)120 (0-960)400 (0-1200)0 (0-800)
    Moderate PA (MET-min/week), median (Q1-Q3)0 (0-360)0 (0-360)0 (0-360)
    Walking (MET-min/week), median (Q1-Q3)495 (198-990)594 (198-1188)495 (198-990)

    aP<.001 by the Kruskal-Wallis test between breakfast, lunch, and dinner for energy and 3 macronutrients.

    bPA: physical activity.

    cMET: metabolic equivalents.

    Relationship Between Intake of the 3 Macronutrients and Physical Activity

    Based on correlation analysis, each physical activity level had the strongest positive association with breakfast or lunch protein intake among the 3 macronutrients during the 3 meals (Table 2). Total, vigorous, and moderate physical activities were positively related to breakfast protein intake, while walking was positively related to lunch protein intake (total physical activity: P<.001, vigorous physical activity: P<.001, moderate physical activity: P<.001, walking: P<.001).

    Table 2. Correlation analysis (Spearman rank correlation coefficient) of intake and composition of the 3 macronutrients and International Physical Activity Questionnaire findings.
    VariableTotal PAa (METb- min/week)Vigorous PA (MET-min/week)Moderate PA (MET-min/week)Walking (MET-min/week)
    Intake (g)




    		Breakfast protein0.170c0.191c0.072c0.052c

    		Breakfast fat0.038c0.0210.0190.033d

    		Breakfast carbohydrate0.041c0.0020.0140.050c

    		Lunch protein0.142c0.170c0.039c0.053c

    		Lunch fat0.0160.0211−0.0090.017

    		Lunch carbohydrate0.023e−0.001−0.0140.050c

    		Dinner protein0.091c0.123c0.0110.037c

    		Dinner fat−0.0140.010−0.027e−0.010

    		Dinner carbohydrate−0.011−0.021−0.030d0.015
    Composition (% kcal)　　　　

    		Breakfast protein0.149c0.196c0.066c0.023e

    		Breakfast fat−0.032d−0.031d−0.009−0.006

    		Breakfast carbohydrate−0.047c−0.086c−0.022e0.013

    		Lunch protein0.134c0.175c0.065c0.023e

    		Lunch fat−0.021−0.007−0.004−0.022e

    		Lunch carbohydrate−0.047c−0.083c−0.0200.007

    		Dinner protein0.108c0.134c0.055c0.028e

    		Dinner fat−0.055c−0.024e−0.012−0.052c

    		Dinner carbohydrate−0.030d−0.060c−0.0170.004

    aPA: physical activity.

    bMET: metabolic equivalents.

    cP<.001 (Spearman rank correlation coefficient).

    dP<.01 (Spearman rank correlation coefficient).

    eP<.05 (Spearman rank correlation coefficient).

    Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that vigorous and moderate physical activities were most strongly positively related with breakfast protein intake, even after adjustment for confounding factors, such as sex, age, BMI, and frequency of recording (Multimedia Appendix 4). On the other hand, although total physical activity was associated with breakfast protein intake, it showed the strongest positive relationship with lunch protein intake. Walking had a positive relationship with dinner protein intake.

    Relationship Between the Composition of the 3 Macronutrients (% kcal) and Physical Activity

    Correlation analysis showed that total, vigorous, and moderate physical activities were positively associated with breakfast protein intake, while walking was positively associated with dinner protein intake (total physical activity: P<.001, vigorous physical activity: P<.001, moderate physical activity: P<.001, walking: P<.010) (Table 2). On the other hand, multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed the strongest positive association of total physical activity with breakfast, and vigorous physical activity with lunch. No association with any of the nutrients could be confirmed for moderate exercise.

    Grouping by Protein Intake and Composition

    The total protein intake per meal per day was similar between groups. Grouping by protein intake revealed that the breakfast and lunch groups demonstrated significantly greater physical activity (ie, total and vigorous physical activities) when compared with the dinner group (Table 3). In terms of walking, the lunch group presented significantly greater physical activity than the dinner group.

    Table 3. International Physical Activity Questionnaire findings by meal type with the highest protein intake and composition from each meal.
    VariableBreakfastLunchDinnerP valuea




    		B vs LbB vs DcL vs Dd
    Meal type with the highest protein intake






    		Total PAe (METf-min/week), median (Q1-Q3)1440 (693-2520)1362 (597-2672)1200 (528-2280).58<.001.001

    		Vigorous PA (MET-min/week), median (Q1-Q3)400 (0-1120)240 (0-960)80 (0-960).20<.001.02

    		Moderate PA (MET-min/week), median (Q1-Q3)0 (0-480)0 (0-360)0 (0-360)>.99.33.95

    		Walking (MET-min/week), median (Q1-Q3)495 (198-990)528 (198-1134)495 (198-990)>.99>.99.049
    Meal type with the highest protein composition






    		Total PA (MET-min/week), median (Q1-Q3)1386 (671-2597)1266 (528-2376)1188 (516-2234).02<.001.34

    		Vigorous PA (MET-min/week), median (Q1-Q3)400 (0-1120)80 (0-960)0 (0-840)<.001<.001.04

    		Moderate PA (MET-min/week), median (Q1-Q3)0 (0-420)0 (0-360)0 (0-360).12.02>.99

    		Walking (MET-min/week), median (Q1-Q3)495 (198-990)495 (198-990)495 (198-990)>.99.94>.99

    aMann-Whitney U test.

    bBreakfast versus lunch.

    cBreakfast versus dinner.

    dLunch versus dinner.

    ePA: physical activity.

    fMET: metabolic equivalents.

    In addition, on grouping by protein composition, the breakfast group showed significantly higher total and vigorous physical activities than the lunch and dinner groups. Considering vigorous physical activity, the lunch group showed significantly greater physical activity than the dinner group. Finally, in terms of moderate physical activity, the breakfast group exhibited significantly greater physical activity than the dinner group.


    Principal Findings

    In this study, we investigated the relationship of protein intake and composition during 3 meals with physical activity among adult male and female users of the mobile health app “Asken.” This study revealed that the daily amount of protein was higher than the recommended amount and the amount of physical activity was lower than the recommended amount. These findings could be attributed to the nature of the “Asken” app, which is a health care app typically designed to maintain or lose weight. In addition, because female individuals are generally more physically inactive than male individuals [27], the gender ratio of participants in this study may have influenced the results. Moreover, our results revealed that protein intake at breakfast and lunch showed the strongest positive relationship with physical activity among the 3 macronutrients consumed during the 3 meals. In addition, on grouping by protein intake patterns, those who consumed the most protein at breakfast and lunch exhibited significantly higher physical activity levels than those who consumed more protein at dinner. These results were similar for both intake and composition, indicating that not only intake but also the amount of protein in the overall diet is positively associated with the magnitude of physical activity. Several previous studies have reported that breakfast and lunch protein intakes affected the maintenance of muscle function [16,28,29]. Indeed, skeletal muscle mass increased in older individuals when protein was supplemented at breakfast and lunch [29]. A recent study has reported that in rodents, breakfast protein was effective in inducing muscle hypertrophy [16]. In addition, increased muscle mass has been shown to be negatively associated with mental health risks, such as depressed mood and stress, in addition to physical health [30,31]. Therefore, increasing protein intake at breakfast and lunch may enhance muscle mass, as well as promote physical and mental health. Indeed, among adolescent males and females, those with lower protein intake, especially those with lower milk intake at breakfast, have been reported to have lower scores for depression and anxiety symptoms [32]. Another possibility is that individuals with higher physical activity levels are more health conscious and typically consume more protein in the morning and afternoon. Several previous studies have reported a positive association between protein intake and physical activity levels [33-35]. However, these reports focused on daily protein intake, and few studies have examined intake at each meal. In addition, studies that have investigated protein intake in each diet have only investigated intake and have not confirmed the characteristics with respect to the distribution of intake [36]. Therefore, the finding that breakfast and lunch protein intakes are particularly related to physical activity is a new finding first presented in this study. Recently, 2 interesting longitudinal studies reported that high-quality protein evaluated by the “protein digestibility–corrected amino acid score” at breakfast but not lunch and dinner was positively associated with maintaining not only muscle strength but also brain cognition in Japanese older adults [37,38]. These studies have suggested future analysis of protein sources at breakfast using the “Asken” app.

    Study Strengths and Limitations

    In this study, we investigated the relationship between the 3 major nutrients during the 3 traditional meals and physical activity using a large data set. In addition, we examined the characteristics of physical activity by grouping individuals according to the meal with the highest protein consumption. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has examined dietary patterns of the 3 meals and daily physical activity in such a large data set. Accordingly, the strength of this study is that it analyzed the characteristics of physical activity according to daily dietary patterns, along with the relationship between protein intake and physical activity, which is an effective factor for the regulation of muscle function that has not been addressed in previous studies.

    However, this study had several limitations. First, as this survey was based on self-reports by the participants, there may be discrepancies in their actual dietary data and physical activity levels. In other words, participants may have responded by exaggerating or underestimating their lifestyles based on social expectations. Second, given the nature of the app used in this study, most participants were female, and accordingly, menstruation could not be considered. Although the survey was analyzed by eliminating the influence of gender as appropriate, it could have marginally impacted the results. Third, the app offered courses for various health purposes, such as weight maintenance, weight loss, and muscle gain. Since we recruited subjects from among all users, there may have been a mix of subjects with different objectives, which may have affected the results. Fourth, this study did not take into account stress or sleep, which could have affected the quantity and content of the meals. That is, participants may have increased consumption of foods high in fat and carbohydrates. Fifth, our results showed a small value for the correlation coefficient. This may be partly due to the large sample size, but since a similar sample size was used in a previous study [39,40], we followed the same approach in our analysis. In addition, Spearman rank correlation analysis was conducted in this study to investigate the trend of association, and more detailed relationships were confirmed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Finally, in the present survey experiments, we could not obtain timing information on snacks. Protein content (16.9 g) and percentage energy of protein (19.1%) may participate in the increase of physical activity when a snack is taken between breakfast and lunch.

    Conclusions

    We analyzed the relationship of protein intake and composition during the 3 traditional meals with the amount of physical activity, as well as the characteristics of physical activity according to protein intake patterns in adult males and females. These results revealed that protein intake at breakfast and lunch had the strongest positive association with daily physical activity, and they were closely related to each other. The results suggest that breakfast may have an important role in physical activity. However, since this study focused only on protein, future studies should also consider protein sources.

    Acknowledgments

    All participants are gratefully acknowledged. This work was partially supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A, 19H01089 for SS; C, 21K11606 for YT) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, the JST-Mirai Program (JMPJM120D5 for SS), the JST-FOREST Program (JPMJFR205G for YT), and the Public Health Research Foundation (2020; for YT).

    Authors' Contributions

    TS, YT, MM, AT, SS, and NA designed and conducted this study. TS analyzed the data. SM, LN, and MK assisted with the statistical analysis. YT and SS advised on the interpretation of the results. The first draft of the manuscript was written by ST, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    AT and NA are full-time employees of Asken Inc. MM is a corporate officer in Asken Inc. The other authors declare no competing interests.

    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Comparison of average nutrient intake between the National Nutrition Survey in Japan (NNSJ) 2019 and the data of this study.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 166 KB
    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 2

    Characteristics of meal types with the highest protein intake from each meal.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 165 KB
    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 3

    Characteristics of meal types with the highest protein composition from each meal.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 188 KB
    ‎
    Multimedia Appendix 4

    Association of the intake and composition of the 3 macronutrients in each meal with International Physical Activity Questionnaire findings.

    PDF File (Adobe PDF File), 179 KB
    1. Scott D, Park MS, Kim TN, Ryu JY, Hong HC, Yoo HJ, et al. Associations of low muscle mass and the metabolic syndrome in Caucasian and Asian middle-aged and older adults. J Nutr Health Aging 2016 Mar;20(3):248-255. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Son JW, Lee SS, Kim SR, Yoo SJ, Cha BY, Son HY, et al. Low muscle mass and risk of type 2 diabetes in middle-aged and older adults: findings from the KoGES. Diabetologia 2017 May;60(5):865-872. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Shimokata H, Ando F, Yuki A, Otsuka R. Age-related changes in skeletal muscle mass among community-dwelling Japanese: a 12-year longitudinal study. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2014 Feb;14 Suppl 1:85-92. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Paddon-Jones D, Rasmussen BB. Dietary protein recommendations and the prevention of sarcopenia. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2009 Jan;12(1):86-90 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Dietary Reference Intakes for Japanese, 2020. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.   URL: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/kenkou/eiyou/syokuji_kijyun.html [accessed 2021-09-13]
    6. Ishikawa-Takata K, Takimoto H. Current protein and amino acid intakes among Japanese people: Analysis of the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018 May;18(5):723-731. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. What We Eat in America, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2018. US Department of Agriculture.   URL: https:/​/www.​ars.usda.gov/​northeast-area/​beltsville-md-bhnrc/​beltsville-human-nutrition-research-center/​food-surveys-research-group/​docs/​wweia-data-tables/​ [accessed 2021-09-13]
    8. Mishra S, Goldman JD, Sahyoun NR, Moshfegh AJ. Association between dietary protein intake and grip strength among adults aged 51 years and over: What We Eat in America, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2014. PLoS One 2018;13(1):e0191368 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Farsijani S, Payette H, Morais JA, Shatenstein B, Gaudreau P, Chevalier S. Even mealtime distribution of protein intake is associated with greater muscle strength, but not with 3-y physical function decline, in free-living older adults: the Quebec longitudinal study on Nutrition as a Determinant of Successful Aging (NuAge study). Am J Clin Nutr 2017 Jul;106(1):113-124. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Yasuda J, Asako M, Arimitsu T, Fujita S. Association of protein intake in three meals with muscle mass in healthy young subjects: a cross-sectional study. Nutrients 2019 Mar 13;11(3):612 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Mamerow MM, Mettler JA, English KL, Casperson SL, Arentson-Lantz E, Sheffield-Moore M, et al. Dietary protein distribution positively influences 24-h muscle protein synthesis in healthy adults. J Nutr 2014 Jun;144(6):876-880 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Lee TS, Kim JS, Hwang YJ, Park YC. Habit of eating breakfast is associated with a lower risk of hypertension. J Lifestyle Med 2016 Sep;6(2):64-67 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Ballon A, Neuenschwander M, Schlesinger S. Breakfast skipping is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes among adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Nutr 2019 Jan 01;149(1):106-113. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Li Z, Xu L, Dai R, Li L, Wang H. Effects of regular breakfast habits on metabolic and cardiovascular diseases: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021 Nov 05;100(44):e27629 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Yasuda J, Tomita T, Arimitsu T, Fujita S. Evenly distributed protein intake over 3 meals augments resistance exercise-induced muscle hypertrophy in healthy young men. J Nutr 2020 Jul 01;150(7):1845-1851 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Aoyama S, Kim H, Hirooka R, Tanaka M, Shimoda T, Chijiki H, et al. Distribution of dietary protein intake in daily meals influences skeletal muscle hypertrophy via the muscle clock. Cell Rep 2021 Jul 06;36(1):109336 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Burd N, Tang J, Moore D, Phillips S. Exercise training and protein metabolism: influences of contraction, protein intake, and sex-based differences. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2009 May;106(5):1692-1701 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. National Health and Nutrition Survey 2019. Official Statistics of Japan.   URL: https:/​/www.​e-stat.go.jp/​stat-search/​files?page=1&layout=datalist&toukei=00450171&tstat=000001041744&cycle=7&year=20190&month=0&tclass1=000001148507 [accessed 2022-03-06]
    19. Asken Inc.   URL: https://www.asken.inc/eng [accessed 2022-06-23]
    20. Shimpo M, Fukkoshi Y, Akamatsu R. Correlations between self-efficacy in resisting six temptations and dietary energy and macronutrient intake at each meal. Eat Behav 2014 Dec;15(4):563-566 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Matsuzaki E, Michie M, Kawabata T. Validity of nutrient intakes derived from an internet website dish-based dietary record for self-management of weight among Japanese women. Nutrients 2017 Sep 24;9(10):1058 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Shinozaki N, Murakami K. Evaluation of the ability of diet-tracking mobile applications to estimate energy and nutrient intake in Japan. Nutrients 2020 Oct 29;12(11):3327 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. The National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan, 2019. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.   URL: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/kenkou/eiyou/r1-houkoku_00002.html [accessed 2021-10-05]
    24. Craig C, Marshall A, Sjostrom M, Bauman A, Booth M, Ainsworth B, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 2003;35(8):1381-1395 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    25. IPAQ scoring protocol. The IPAQ Group.   URL: https://sites.google.com/site/theipaq/scoring-protocol [accessed 2021-09-13]
    26. Physical Activity Standards for Health Promotion, 2013. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare.   URL: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/houdou/2r9852000002xple.html [accessed 2021-09-13]
    27. Rosenfeld CS. Sex-dependent differences in voluntary physical activity. J Neurosci Res 2017 Jan 02;95(1-2):279-290 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Aoyama S, Nakahata Y, Shinohara K. Chrono-nutrition has potential in preventing age-related muscle loss and dysfunction. Front Neurosci 2021;15:659883 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Norton C, Toomey C, McCormack W, Francis P, Saunders J, Kerin E, et al. Protein supplementation at breakfast and lunch for 24 weeks beyond habitual intakes increases whole-body lean tissue mass in healthy older adults. J Nutr 2016 Jan;146(1):65-69 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Moon J, Kong M, Kim H. Low muscle mass and depressed mood in Korean adolescents: a cross-sectional analysis of the fourth and fifth Korea national health and nutrition examination surveys. J Korean Med Sci 2018 Dec 10;33(50):e320 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Noh H, Park Y. Handgrip strength, dynapenia, and mental health in older Koreans. Sci Rep 2020 Mar 04;10(1):4004-4004 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Khanna P, Aeri BT. Association of quantity and quality of protein intake with depression and anxiety symptoms among adolescent boys and girls (13–15 years) studying in public schools of Delhi. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol 2020;66(Supplement):S141-S148 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
    33. Takae R, Hatamoto Y, Yasukata J, Kose Y, Komiyama T, Ikenaga M, et al. Physical activity and/or high protein intake maintains fat-free mass in older people with mild disability; the Fukuoka Island City Study: a cross-sectional study. Nutrients 2019 Oct 29;11(11):2595 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. An K. Physical activity level in Korean adults: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017. Epidemiol Health 2019;41:e2019047 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Van Walleghen EL, Orr JS, Gentile CL, Davy KP, Davy BM. Habitual physical activity differentially affects acute and short-term energy intake regulation in young and older adults. Int J Obes (Lond) 2007 Aug 6;31(8):1277-1285. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Gaytán-González A, Ocampo-Alfaro MDJ, Torres-Naranjo F, González-Mendoza RG, Gil-Barreiro M, Arroniz-Rivera M, et al. Dietary protein intake patterns and inadequate protein intake in older adults from four countries. Nutrients 2020 Oct 16;12(10):3156 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Kinoshita K, Otsuka R, Takada M, Tsukamoto-Yasui M, Nishita Y, Tange C, et al. Low amino acid score of breakfast is associated with the incidence of cognitive impairment in older Japanese adults: a community-based longitudinal study. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 2022;9(1):151-157. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Kinoshita K, Otsuka R, Nishita Y, Tange C, Tomida M, Zhang S, et al. Breakfast protein quality and muscle strength in Japanese older adults: a community-based longitudinal study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2022 May;23(5):729-735.e2 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Tahara Y, Shinto T, Inoue K, Roshanmehr F, Ito A, Michie M, et al. Changes in sleep phase and body weight of mobile health app users during COVID-19 mild lockdown in Japan. Int J Obes (Lond) 2021 Oct;45(10):2277-2280 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Mineshita Y, Kim H, Chijiki H, Nanba T, Shinto T, Furuhashi S, et al. Screen time duration and timing: effects on obesity, physical activity, dry eyes, and learning ability in elementary school children. BMC Public Health 2021 Feb 28;21(1):422 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    IPAQ: International Physical Activity Questionnaire
    MET: metabolic equivalents
    NNSJ: National Nutrition Survey in Japan

    Edited by H Bradley; submitted 21.12.21; peer-reviewed by K Heinrich, DW Waqar Ali; comments to author 24.02.22; revised version received 23.03.22; accepted 25.05.22; published 12.07.22

    Copyright

    ©Takae Shinto, Saneyuki Makino, Yu Tahara, Lyie Nitta, Mai Kuwahara, Ayako Tada, Nanako Abe, Mikiko Michie, Shigenobu Shibata. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 12.07.2022.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.