This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Prevention and Health Promotion (955) Vaccination and Immunization in the Digital Age (366) Behavioural Surveillance for Public Health (221)

Published on in Vol 10 (2024)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/51242, first published .
Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Herpes Zoster Vaccination Among Chinese Adults: Discrete Choice Experiment

Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Herpes Zoster Vaccination Among Chinese Adults: Discrete Choice Experiment

Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Herpes Zoster Vaccination Among Chinese Adults: Discrete Choice Experiment

Authors of this article:

Yiqi Xia1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Ming Wang1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Mingzheng Hu1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Yanshang Wang1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Beibei Yuan2 Author Orcid Image ;   Dawei Zhu3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Ping He2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics

    Original Paper

    1School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China

    2China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China

    3Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China

    4International Research Center for Medicinal Administration, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Corresponding Author:

    Ping He, PhD

    China Center for Health Development Studies

    Peking University

    38 Xue Yuan Road, Haidian District

    Beijing, 100191

    China

    Phone: 86 13911160537

    Email: phe@pku.edu.cn


    Background: The incidence of herpes zoster (HZ) is rapidly increasing, causing both clinical and economic burdens in China. Very little is known about Chinese residents’ HZ vaccine preferences and willingness to pay (WTP) for each vaccination attribute.

    Objective: This study aims to elicit the preferences of Chinese urban adults (aged 25 years or older) regarding HZ vaccination programs and to calculate WTP for each vaccination attribute.

    Methods: In this study, we interviewed 2864 residents in 9 cities in China. A discrete choice experiment was conducted to investigate the residents’ preferences for HZ vaccination and to predict the uptake rate for different vaccine scenarios. A mixed logit model was used to estimate the preferences and WTP for each attribute. Seven attributes with different levels were included in the experiment, and we divided the coefficients of other attributes by the coefficient of price to measure WTP.

    Results: Vaccine effectiveness, protection duration, risk of side effects, place of origin, and cost were proven to influence Chinese adults’ preferences for HZ vaccination. The effectiveness of the HZ vaccine was the attribute that had the most predominant impact on residents’ preferences, followed by protection duration. The residents were willing to pay CN ¥974 (US $145) to increase the vaccine effectiveness from 45% to 90%, and they would barely pay to exchange the vaccination schedule from 2 doses to 1 dose. It is suggested that the expected uptake could be promoted the most (by 20.84%) with an increase in the protection rate from 45% to 90%.

    Conclusions: Chinese urban adults made trade-offs between vaccine effectiveness, protection duration, place of origin, side effects, and cost of HZ vaccination. Vaccine effectiveness was the most important characteristic. The residents have the highest WTP (CN ¥974; US $145) for enhancing the effectiveness of vaccines. To maximize HZ vaccine uptake, health authorities should promote vaccine effectiveness.

    JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024;10:e51242

    doi:10.2196/51242

    Keywords

    herpes zoster; vaccine preference; willingness to pay; discrete choice experiment; mixed logit model 


    Herpes zoster (HZ), or shingles, is caused by the reactivation of latent varicella-zoster virus infection, which typically manifests itself as a localized, painful dermatomal rash [1]. The most common complication for HZ is postherpetic neuralgia, which can cause severe and burning pain and can greatly limit daily activities [2,3]. The severity of HZ is a major public health issue worldwide, especially in China [4], imposing a substantial burden on both patients and the health care system [5]. The global incidence of HZ was 3 to 5 per 1000 person-years, which continued to rise by 2.5% to 5% every year [6,7], and was 2.9 to 5.8 per 1000 person-years in mainland China [5,8]. In the United States, the economic burden for HZ could exceed US $2 billion per year, resulting in more than 60,000 quality-adjusted life-years lost per year [9]. A recent study conducted in Shandong, China, assessed the disease burden for HZ as 59.99 disability-adjusted life-years per 100,000 population [10]. Data gathered from Yinzhou district, China, showed the inpatient and outpatient cost per new-onset HZ was approximately CN ¥8116.9 (US $1207) and CN ¥560.2 (US $83), respectively [11]

    Existing evidence supports that vaccination is the best way to reduce the incidence of HZ [12,13]. In addition, a majority of studies found it to be cost-effective to vaccinate against HZ [14]. Currently, 2 types of HZ vaccines are commonly used globally, one of which is a recombinant zoster vaccine available in China since 2020 and recommended for adults older than 50 years [8,15]. However, HZ vaccine uptake remains relatively low worldwide [15], along with the low willingness to pay (WTP) for HZ vaccines [8]. Vaccine decisions are often determined by an individual’s requirements and interests [16]. Whether to get vaccinated is, hence, based on internal and vaccine-specific characteristics, such as personal values [17], vaccine effectiveness [18], and cost [19], which can be interpreted as vaccine preferences [19]. Consequently, it is vital to consider the public’s preferences for HZ vaccination.

    Studies investigating the public’s preferences for HZ vaccination are limited and fragmented. Although a growing number of studies have tried to find the main barriers to HZ vaccine acceptance [20], only 3 published studies have examined HZ vaccine preferences among older people in the context of high- and low-income countries with discrete choice experiments (DCEs): 2 from high-income countries [21,22] and 1 from low-income countries [23]. Zhang et al [23] investigated the HZ vaccine preferences among older Chinese residents with a relatively small sample size (176 residents); but still, very little is known about HZ vaccine preferences among adults in low-income countries. There is no comprehensive, nationwide survey about HZ vaccine preferences and WTP for different HZ vaccine attributes of the Chinese population across regions, although China is one of the prominent candidates in the global contest for vaccine research and development [24]. Moreover, it is worth studying adults younger than 50 years because the younger population may affect HZ vaccination by influencing their parents who are probably older than 50 years, and the study may provide an opportunity to compare the differences in preferences for HZ vaccination between younger and older populations [25].

    In this study, we aimed to use a DCE to explore the preferences for different attributes of HZ vaccination among the Chinese urban population aged 25 years and older and to evaluate the residents’ WTP for each attribute. We further calculated the probability of selecting different HZ vaccines to better describe the preference characteristics.


    DCE Study Design

    Overview

    DCE, originating from mathematical psychology, is widely used to capture preferences in vaccination since the evidence showed that DCEs yielded accurate predictions of actual choices [19,26,27]. When measuring vaccine preferences with DCEs, individuals are given a series of alternative vaccine scenarios and are asked to select their preferred scenario [19,28]. Within each scenario, the vaccines are described by their attributes (eg, effectiveness) with variants of corresponding levels (eg, the effectiveness of 50% vs 90%) [28]. By assessing individual’s responses to different combinations of attribute levels, preferences for vaccine attributes are able to be obtained and described [29,30].

    Here, we developed a cross-sectional DCE survey following standard steps [31,32] and administrated the experiments in July 2022 among adults aged 25 years and older in 9 cities in China. The survey consisted of DCE questions and measures of respondents’ characteristics (sex, age, educational level, marriage status, occupation, and annual net household income in 2021). Questionnaires were conducted face-to-face by well-trained and eligible investigators (mainly medical school students).

    Attributes and Levels

    The selection of vaccine attributes and their levels is key for ensuring the validity of DCEs [33]. Since there are limited studies about Chinese residents’ HZ vaccine preferences, we selected 7 relevant HZ vaccination attributes and their levels based on literature about HZ vaccine preferences in China and other countries and Chinese residents’ preferences for another vaccine [21-23,28,34]. We also referred to existing HZ vaccine marketing information and conducted a pilot study to ensure that the parameters in these references were applicable to conditions in China: (1) effectiveness (eg, 45%); (2) protection duration (eg, 2 years); (3) number of vaccine doses (eg, 1 dose); (4) probability of influenza-like symptoms (eg, 1/100); (5) probability of skin reaction (eg, 5/100); (6) place of origin (eg, imported); and (7) price (eg, CN ¥400 [US $59]). The details of the attributes and levels are displayed in Table 1.

    Table 1. Attributes and levels for the discrete choice experiment.
    AttributeLevels for experimentally designed vaccines
    Effectiveness (%)a 45b, 60, 75, and 90
    Protection duration (years)c2b, 5, 10, and 20
    Number of vaccine dosesd1 doseb and 2 doses (2 months apart)
    Probability of influenza-like symptomse1/100b, 5/100, 10/100, and 20/100
    Probability of skin reactionf1/100b, 5/100, 10/100, and 20/100
    Place of originImported and domesticb
    Price (CN ¥) 0b, 400 (US $59), 800 (US $119), and 1200 (US $178)

    aEffectiveness is the degree to which the prevalence of the disease decreases after vaccination, which can also be interpreted as protection rate. Suppose there are 1000 people, and with everyone unvaccinated, 33 people might have herpes zoster (HZ) in the next 5 years. If everyone is vaccinated against HZ with a 45% vaccine effectiveness, the number of people who will have HZ in the next 5 years will drop to 18, and so on.

    bDenotes the reference level.

    cProtection duration refers to the duration of immune protection against the infectious disease targeted after vaccination.

    dThe number of doses refers to the total number of doses required to complete the vaccination process.

    eInfluenza-like symptoms refer to fever, fatigue, muscle pain, headache, and nausea that may occur in recipients after vaccination. With a 1/100 probability, 1 in 100 recipients may suffer from 1 or more of these symptoms; with a 20/100 probability, 20 in 100 recipients may suffer from 1 or more of these symptoms.

    fSkin reactions refer to symptoms such as redness, swelling, hard nodules, pain, and itching at the vaccination site that may occur when the recipient is vaccinated. With a 1/100 probability, 1 out of 100 recipients may suffer from 1 or more of these symptoms; with a 20/100 probability, 20 out of 100 recipients may suffer from 1 or more of these symptoms.

    Experiment and Questionnaire Design

    The vaccine scenarios in each alternative were determined by an experimental design using the attributes and levels in Table 1. Combining the 7 attributes with each level results in 4096 (4×4×2×4×4×2×4) hypothetical HZ vaccination alternatives. Since it is not feasible for a single respondent to answer all these 4096 alternatives, we used an orthogonal experimental design to generate a sample of alternatives from all these 4096 alternatives [35,36]. Since orthogonal designs are more intuitive and require fewer choice sets and thus shorter questionnaires than efficient designs with the same number of participants, an orthogonal design was used to counterbalance a more precise estimation of the coefficients and fewer choice sets [28,37]. A total of 32 choice questions were shown to sufficiently estimate all the main attributes. We used a blocked design [38] to further divide 32 choice tasks into 4 versions of questionnaires containing 8 choice sets each, which avoided a lower response rate or lower response reliability caused by presenting a single individual with a large number of choice sets. Each choice set presented 2 alternative vaccines in terms of 7 attributes and an option of no HZ vaccination (Table 2), a full version of the questionnaires is presented in Multimedia Appendix 1. To specify the attributes, each questionnaire started with a detailed description of the attributes and their levels. Additionally, the well-trained investigators were told to explain the meaning of each attribute and to ensure the comprehension of the respondents before filling in the questionnaire. During the filling process, the respondents could ask questions about the attributes at any time.

    Table 2. An example of choice setsa. The description of the attributes and their levels are as follows: “Thank you for agreeing to take part in this survey. Assuming that you have two options for herpes zoster vaccine that differ in price, effectiveness, protection duration, adverse effects, etc, please choose the vaccination option you prefer based on your personal preference among the pairs of options below. When you make a choice, please assume that all conditions are the same for vaccine 1 and vaccine 2 except for the factors listed.” Towards the end of the questionnaire, the respondent was given the following choice: “Which do you prefer: vaccine 1; vaccine 2; neither.”
    AttributeVaccine 1Vaccine 2
    Effectiveness (%)9045
    Protection duration (years)25
    Number of vaccine doses2 doses (2 months apart)1 dose
    Probability of influenza-like symptoms1/1005/100
    Probability of skin reaction20/1001/100
    Place of originImporteddomestic
    Price (CN ¥)0400 (US $59)

    aThere are 4 versions of the discrete choice experiment questions, each with 8 questions, and each respondent is randomly assigned a version of the questions.

    WTP for the Attributes

    In total, 7 types of attributes were identified to be potentially important to HZ vaccination choices, including the price of the vaccine that allows us to generate estimates of WTP for each vaccine attribute [39]. In other words, we could obtain the individual’s WTP for desirable attributes and analyze the effect of changing attribute levels on WTP indirectly with the price attribute in the DCE questionnaire through the ratios between the coefficients of the price (cost) attribute with the other HZ vaccination attributes [30]. For example, the WTP for switching the protection duration to 5 years from the reference level (2 years) equaled the coefficient of the variable “duration 5 years” divided by the coefficient of the variable “price.” The levels of the cost attribute may inevitably impact the WTP estimates though, so we tried to avoid this problem by setting the levels rigorously according to the literature [40].

    Study Population

    Survey Sampling

    A 2-stage random sampling method was adopted. In the first stage, 9 cities were selected according to gross domestic product per capita and the number of permanent urban residents (except Tibet and Xinjiang) using the probability-to-size sampling method, including 5 cities in eastern China (Beijing, Shenzhen, Weifang, Shaoxing, and Changchun), 2 cities in central China (Wuhan and Zhengzhou), and 2 cities in western China (Nanning and Zunyi). In the second stage, high and low economic level districts (county) were selected in each city, respectively, and 2 community health service centers or township health centers were then selected in each district (county).

    We recruited respondents randomly with acknowledgments after arriving at the health service centers. Eligible respondents were aged 25 years and older, living in China, without cognitive impairments, and able to read and understand Chinese [21,33]. A pilot study was conducted among 300 residents in Beijing in July 2021 to examine whether the survey was acceptable, well-understood, and valid.

    Sample Size

    Initially, we calculated the minimum sample size according to a rule of thumb suggested by Jonson and Orme [41] and found a sample size of 83 in each district (county) would be desirable for the main effects model. As a result, we decided to choose 300 individuals in each city, which exceeded the desirable sample size and comprised a sample size of at least 2700 randomly selected residents in 9 cities. We guaranteed the respondents’ voluntary participation and privacy, and verbal consent of the respondents was obtained. The investigators gave a detailed explanatory statement to each respondent about the study.

    Statistical Analysis

    The DCE results were estimated by taking each choice among the 3 options (“two HPV vaccination” alternatives and a “no HPV vaccination” alternative) [28]. A mixed logit model was used to analyze DCE data [42]. We checked the convergence of the model with all parameters randomly distributed, 500 draws used, and seed set to 12,345 for reproducibility. The utility equation can be expressed as follows:

    where V is the utility from each choice. β0 is a constant reflecting respondents’ preferences for receiving HZ vaccination relative to “no HPV vaccination.” β1-β15 are coefficients of the attributes indicating the weights relative to their reference levels, where larger values of β indicate greater utility and more preferred attributes. ε is a random error term. We regulated the statistical significance of a coefficient as P≤.05, and we expected all attributes to be statistically significant. The sign of a coefficient reflects whether the attribute has a positive or negative effect on vaccine preferences. In our assumption, the estimated attribute levels of “SCHEDULE” and “INFLUENZA_LIKE_SYMPTOMS” and the attribute “PRICE” would have a negative sign, and the signs of other coefficients would be positive. The price attribute was treated as a continuous variable, while other attributes were dummy-coded [43]. We also explored the preferences for HZ vaccination between different age, sex, and income.

    To investigate the WTP for each attribute, the monetary value for other attributes was calculated by the ratios between the coefficients of out-of-pocket cost (price of the vaccine) with the other HZ vaccination attributes [34]. It can be interpreted as a tradeoff in monetary value to achieve an increase or a decrease in 1 level of an attribute. For instance, β1/β15 indicates how much the respondents were willing to pay for a vaccination with a 60% protection rate instead of the reference level of protection rate (45%), holding all other attributes unchanged. CIs of the WTP were calculated by bootstrapping [44].

    We further calculated the probability of individuals choosing a vaccination with specified attributes to convey understandable information to policy makers. The probability of choosing a vaccination program is defined as:

    where V is defined as in Equation 1. The base case of the HZ vaccination program was a 45% protection rate, protection duration of 2 years, vaccination schedule of 1 dose, 1/100 risk of influenza-like symptoms, 1/100 risk of skin reaction, and originated from domestic place, which was the combination of the reference level of each attribute (except for cost attribute). We presented these results in a “tornado” graph to show the marginal effect of changing each attribute at a time relative to the base case, holding all other attributes constant [28,34]. All heterogeneity were considered in the calculation of the mean uptake. We performed all statistical analyses in STATA (version 15.0; Stata Corp).

    Ethical Considerations

    The respondents provided informed consent before filling in the questionnaire and agreed to the use and publication of their data in journal papers. The questionnaire was completely anonymous, and the data were protected by privacy law. During the process of filling in the questionnaire, all respondents could withdraw from the survey at any time. This study was approved by the Peking University institutional review board (IRB00001052-20062). No financial compensation was offered to the participants. All procedures performed involving human respondents were in accordance with the ethical standards and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.


    Respondents

    After the pilot study, we confirmed the acceptability and validity of the survey, and mild changes were made to the description texts of the attributes in the questionnaire. Table 3 presents the respondents’ characteristics. A total of 2864 urban residents from 9 cities consented and participated in the survey. Among them, 1523 (53.18%) urban residents were from the eastern region, 641 (22.38%) urban residents were from central China, and 700 (24.44%) urban residents were from the western region. The mean (SD) age of the respondents was 48.14 (16.55) years, ranging from 25 to 95 years. Most respondents were female (1746/2864, 60.96%), married (2463/2864, 86%), and at least had a bachelor’s degree (706/2864, 24.65%). Annual net household income in 2021 was evenly distributed and the majority of the respondents were manual labor (1053/2864, 36.77%).

    Table 3. Sociodemographic characteristics of the study respondents.
    CharacteristicsFrequency, n (%)
    City

    		Eastern region1523 (53.18)

    		Central region641 (22.38)

    		Western region700 (24.44)
    Sex

    		Female1746 (60.96)

    		Male1118 (39.04)
    Age group (years)

    		25-391114 (38.90)

    		40-59929 (32.44)

    		≥60821 (28.66)
    Marital status

    		Unmarried252 (8.8)

    		Married2463 (86)

    		Divorced or widowed149 (5.2)
    Education

    		Primary and below537 (18.75)

    		Middle school588 (20.53)

    		High school581 (20.29)

    		Junior college452 (15.78)

    		Bachelor’s degree and higher706 (24.65)
    Occupation

    		Manual laborer1053 (36.77)

    		Retiree613 (21.4)

    		Unemployed463 (16.17)

    		White collar and professional735 (25.66)
    Annual net household income in 2021

    		CN ¥40,000 (US $5,947) and below741 (25.87)

    		CN ¥40,000 (US $5,947) to CN ¥80,000 (US $11,894)641 (22.38)

    		CN ¥80, 000 (US $11,894) to CN ¥120,000 (US $17,841)644 (22.49)

    		CN ¥120,000 (US $17,841) and more838 (29.26)

    DCE Results

    Table 4 shows the regression results of residents’ preferences for HZ vaccination. The results indicated that all attributes had an effect on residents’ preferences for HZ vaccination (all P<.01), except for vaccination schedules. The coefficient of vaccination (constant) was significantly positive (P<.001), representing that on average the residents were more likely to vaccinate against HZ regardless of the attributes and levels described in the vaccine profile. It is suggested that the higher the protection rate, the longer the protection duration, the lower the risk of flu-like or dermal symptoms, and the lower the cost—the more likely that the HZ vaccination would be preferred. The positive or negative signs were consistent with our prior hypotheses except that respondents preferred the domestic HZ vaccine rather than the imported one. The positive sign given to the coefficients protection rate and protection duration indicated that respondents preferred an HZ vaccination generating a higher degree of protection and a longer protection duration over an HZ vaccination with lower effectiveness and fewer years of protection. The negative signs for influenza-like symptoms and skin reactions indicated that respondents preferred HZ vaccines with a lower probability of side effects. The attribute with the greatest magnitude of association with HZ vaccine preference was effectiveness, followed by protection duration.

    Table 4. Preference of attributes of herpes zoster vaccinesa.
    AttributesCoefficient (SE)95% CIP values
    Constant (vaccination)2.804 (0.152)2.506 to 3.102<.001
    Protection rate (%; reference level: 45%)b<.001

    		600.958 (0.450)0.870 to 1.046

    		751.751 (0.577)1.638 to 1.864

    		902.746 (0.746)2.600 to 2.892
    Protection duration (years; reference level: 2 years)<.001

    		50.404 (0.446)0.317 to 0.491

    		100.678 (0.495)0.581 to 0.775

    		201.013 (0.500)0.915 to 1.111
    Number of vaccine doses (reference level: 1 dose)

    		2 doses–0.001 (0.300)–0.059 to 0.058.98
    Probability of influenza-like symptoms (reference level: 1/100)

    		5/100–0.162 (0.045)–0.249 to –0.074<.001

    		10/100–0.166 (0.550)–0.274 to –0.058<.001

    		20/100–0.272 (0.046)–0.362 to –0.183.002
    Probability of skin reaction(reference level: 1/100)<.001

    		5/100–0.154 (0.042)–0.236 to –0.072

    		10/100–0.233 (0.049)–0.329 to –0.136

    		20/100–0.291 (0.046)–0.382 to –0.201
    Place of origin(reference level: domestic)<.001

    		Imported–0.354 (0.037)–0.427 to –0.282

    		Cost–0.003 (0.000)–0.003 to –0.002

    aNormal distribution for random coefficients used on all attributes.

    bThe attribute “effectiveness” was coded as “protection rate.”

    We presented subgroup analysis for different sex, age, and net household income in 2021 in Multimedia Appendix 2. The trends and signs of preferences for various attributes of the HZ vaccines were consistent across different sex, age groups, and net household income levels. It was illustrated that the male individuals cared more about side effects than the female individuals. The younger and older residents were more sensitive to most attributes than the middle-aged residents. The richer the residents were, the more they were concerned about the effectiveness and protection duration of the HZ vaccination, while the residents whose net household income in 2021 was less than CN ¥80,000 (US $11,894) preferred domestic vaccines more than residents with income more than CN ¥80,000.

    WTP for the Attributes

    Based on Table 4, respondents showed their WTP to achieve an improvement in 1 level of an HZ vaccination attribute in Table 5. When the vaccine protection rate increased from 45% to 60%, 75%, and 90%, the respondents’ WTP for HZ vaccine increased by CN ¥340 (US $51), CN ¥621 (US $92), and CN ¥974 (US $145), respectively. The longer the protection duration, the higher the residents were willing to pay for HZ vaccine. WTP for domestic vaccines instead of imported vaccines was CN ¥126 (US $19). The residents were willing to pay CN ¥103 (US $15) to get vaccination with a 1/100 risk of skin reaction instead of 20/100 risk of skin reaction. The higher the incidence of influenza-like symptoms, the less the residents were willing to pay for HZ vaccine. Compared with 2-dose vaccination schedules, residents were more willing to pay for 1-dose HZ vaccine.

    Table 5. Residents’ willingness to pay for different attributes of a vaccination program.
    AttributesMonetary value (CN ¥)

    		Mean95% CI
    Protection rate (%; reference level: 45%)

    		60339.843 (US $50.526)304.702 to 374.983

    		75620.937 (US $92.318)572.224 to 669.650

    		90973.724 (US $144.768)904.968 to 1042.479
    Protection duration (years; (reference level: 2 years)

    		5143.238 (US $21.296)111.432 to 175.043

    		10240.526 (US $35.760)204.035 to 277.016

    		20359.236 (US $53.409)320.115 to 398.357
    Number of vaccine doses (reference level: 1 dose)

    		2 doses–0.257 (–US $0.038)–21.092 to 20.579
    Probability of influenza-like symptoms (reference level: 1/100)

    		5/100–57.323 (–US $8.522)–88.532 to –26.113

    		10/100–59.001 (–US $8.772)–97.397 to –20.604

    		20/100–96.595 (–US $14.361)–128.627 to –64.563
    Probability of skin reaction(reference level: 1/100)

    		5/100–54.534 (–US $8.108)–83.970 to –25.098

    		10/100–82.658 (–US $12.289)–117.404 to –47.912

    		20/100–103.322 (–US $15.361)–135.743 to –70.902
    Place of origin(reference level: domestic)

    		Imported–125.687 (–US $18.686)–152.053 to –99.320

    Predicted Uptake Rates of HZ Vaccination

    The cost attribute was treated as a continuous variable and was mainly used to calculate the WTP. According to the literature, we dropped the cost attribute from this analysis to show more precise uptake rates of HZ vaccines to avoid confusion about the hypothetical cost levels because levels of the cost attribute may not represent the real price of current or future HZ vaccination programs [28]. The base case is indicated as zero change in the probability of the x-axis and the data presented a change in uptake from the base case (Multimedia Appendix 3). The predicted uptake could be promoted by 20.84%, 14.46%, and 7.72% if the protection rate was 90%, 75%, or 60% instead of a protection rate of 45% in the base case, respectively, holding all other attributes constant. Changes in other attributes and levels also had a relatively large impact on the expected uptake rate, especially when increasing the protection duration to 20 or 10 years from 2 years in the base case or substituting the imported vaccines in the base case with domestic ones. The vaccination schedule could barely interfere with the uptake rate.


    Principal Findings

    Despite the increasing incidence of HZ and its clinical and economic burden on both patients and society, there was no evidence to indicate Chinese residents’ HZ vaccine preferences for promoting the vaccination uptake rate. In this DCE study of 2864 residents on preferences for HZ vaccination in 9 cities in China, we found that preferences among adults aged 25 years and older were affected by vaccination characteristics. Specifically, residents considered HZ vaccine effectiveness to be the most essential attribute, followed by protection duration. Cost had the mildest impact on residents’ preferences, and the number of doses did not seem to affect the preferences for HZ vaccination. We further explored how residents made a trade-off between monetary value and vaccine characteristics. Finally, we declared explicit results about the probability of choosing different HZ vaccines.

    Vaccine effectiveness, protection duration, probability of influenza-like symptoms, probability of skin reactions, place of origin, and cost all showed to influence the residents’ preferences for HZ vaccination. The residents preferred to select the HZ vaccine with a higher protection rate, longer protection duration, fewer side effects, and lower prices. This has been confirmed in several previous studies about preferences for HZ vaccination in the United States [21] and China [23] and other vaccines’ acceptance [28,34,45]. The positive or negative signs of most of the coefficients in this study were consistent with our prior hypotheses and thus, showed theoretical validity [28]. Our study unexpectedly drew the same conclusions as a recent study about influenza vaccine preferences [43] that Chinese residents were more likely to select domestic vaccination. It is suggested that Chinese residents may have more confidence and trust in domestic vaccines nowadays, so the Chinese national immunization program should recognize the importance of developing domestic vaccines [46]. Respondents slightly preferred vaccination schedules of 1 dose over 2 doses, despite the coefficient was not significant. Similar studies about the HZ vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine, and COVID-19 vaccine all demonstrated that Chinese residents preferred shorter vaccination regimens [21,34,45], which could somehow prove the validity of our prior hypothesis.

    We calculated the extent to which the residents preferred each attribute and level. Among all 7 attributes, effectiveness was the most important vaccine characteristic and protection duration was the next most important attribute. Specifically, increasing the protection rate from the lowest level to the highest level could yield 2.7 times as much utilities as increasing the same degree of protection duration of HZ vaccination. Although a recent study in the United States declared that preferences for HZ vaccination were influenced the most by total cost and then vaccine effectiveness [21], studies about German travelers choosing travel vaccines [47] and girls in the Netherlands choosing among HPV vaccinations [28] all showed that vaccine effectiveness was the most predominant attribute. The same results were derived from studies about preferences for COVID-19 vaccination [33] and influenza vaccination [43] in China. Zhang et al [23] found that the most concerning HZ vaccine attribute for Chinese residents was “vaccination of people surrounding them”; however, this attribute was not included in our study. After excluding attributes not presented in our study, vaccine efficacy remained the most significant attribute identified in most research [23,28,33,43,47]. In this study, place of origin, influenza-like symptoms, dermal reactions, and cost associated with HZ vaccination were of lesser importance, and the least important characteristic was the number of vaccine doses, which were highly consistent with another study about HZ vaccine preferences [21]. Consequently, promoting the effectiveness and protection duration while reducing side effects is a practical way to increase HZ vaccine uptake.

    We found that the residents were willing to pay the most to alter the HZ vaccine from 45% effectiveness to 75% effectiveness and 90% effectiveness with CN ¥621 (US $96) and CN ¥974 (US $151), respectively, followed by spending CN ¥359 (US $56) to exchange HZ vaccine with 2 years protection duration to a protection duration of 20 years, again showing the importance of vaccine effectiveness and protection duration. Otherwise, the residents were willing to pay CN ¥103 (US $16) to get vaccination with a 1% risk of skin reaction instead of 20% risk of skin reaction. The trend of change in WTP was similar to the trend in previous studies [23,30,34], which reminded the policy makers to have an awareness of how to price the HZ vaccines with different attribute levels. Hypothetically, if there were an imported HZ vaccine of 45% effectiveness, 2 years of protection, and 20% probability of side effects (a combination of the reference levels), it may be acceptable to pay CN ¥1658 (US $257) more for domestic HZ vaccines of an effectiveness of 90%, 20 years of protection, and 1% probability of both influenza-like symptoms and skin reactions. An advantage of using DCE is to measure WTP indirectly rather than to obtain WTP by asking relevant questions directly [28,30]. Despite evidence that suggests that the inclusion and levels of the cost attribute could influence the estimates [40], we found no evidence proving that including a cost attribute could cause changes in vaccine preferences [48].

    Strengths and Limitations

    Several limitations should be considered when interpreting our results. First, although we selected the most relevant attributes based on the literature, we were unable to cover all aspects of vaccination services. For instance, we did not include the location of vaccination as an estimated attribute as many studies did [21,34], but our investigation took place in community health centers with the respondents who lived nearby and would probably get vaccinated in their community, saving us from asking the place of vaccination. Second, this study surveyed residents in urban areas, which precludes the generalization of the findings [49]. Despite this, a direct policy implication is the improvement of vaccine effectiveness will increase the uptake of HZ vaccination in urban China. Third, our sample contained a relatively large number of eastern region, female, and married residents. Preference heterogeneity among Chinese residents requires future investigation.

    There are also some notable strengths. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the preferences for HZ vaccination comprehensively in China. Our findings verified that the uptake rate of the HZ vaccine can be explained by complex vaccination attributes, particularly vaccine effectiveness. We provide new information about WTP by evaluating the tradeoff between monetary value and HZ vaccine attributes to help price the vaccination programs. Additionally, it is novel that we focused on adults over 25 years instead of 50 years, which largely expanded the study population and made it possible to generalize the results to younger generation.

    Conclusions

    In summary, we used DCE to illustrate that Chinese urban adults made trade-offs between HZ vaccination attributes, and effectiveness was the most important characteristic. The residents had the highest WTP for enhancing the effectiveness of vaccines, demonstrating the significance of promoting vaccine effectiveness. We also presented the probability of choosing different HZ vaccines to give suggestions to policy makers on developing and pricing the HZ vaccination programs.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors would like to thank all those who participated in this project. This study was supported by the Major Project of the National Social Science Fund of China (grant 21&ZD187) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 71904005).

    Data Availability

    The data sets generated during or analyzed during this study are not publicly available to protect the privacy of the participants’ data but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

    Authors' Contributions

    YX was responsible for investigation, formal analysis, writing the original draft, and review and editing. MW contributed to the conceptualization, data curation, investigation, and writing the original draft. MH, YW, and BY participated in the investigation and review and editing. DZ and PH were involved in conceptualization, data curation, and project administration. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

    DZ (dzhu@pku.edu.cn) and PH (phe@pku.edu.cn) are co-corresponding authors of this manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Full version of the questionnaire.

    DOCX File , 37 KB
    Multimedia Appendix 2

    Subgroup analysis.

    DOCX File , 317 KB
    Multimedia Appendix 3

    Univariate marginal estimates for the predicted probability of participation. The x-axis represents the range of probabilities. The y-axis represents the different attributes and levels. The base case is herpes zoster vaccination at 45% protection rate, protection duration of 2 years, vaccination schedule of 1 dose, 1/100 risk of influenza-like symptoms, 1/100 risk of skin reaction, and domestic place of origin, which is indicated as zero change in the probability of the x-axis.

    PNG File , 35 KB
    1. Parikh R, Widenmaier R, Lecrenier N. A practitioner's guide to the recombinant zoster vaccine: review of national vaccination recommendations. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021;20(9):1065-1075. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Cunningham AL, Lal H, Kovac M, Chlibek R, Hwang S, Díez-Domingo J, et al. Efficacy of the herpes zoster subunit vaccine in adults 70 years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(11):1019-1032. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Gilden D, Nagel MA, Cohrs RJ, Mahalingam R. The variegate neurological manifestations of varicella zoster virus infection. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2013;13(9):374. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Li Y, An Z, Yin D, Liu Y, Huang Z, Xu J, et al. Disease burden due to herpes zoster among population aged ≥50 years old in China: a community based retrospective survey. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0152660. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Kawai K, Gebremeskel BG, Acosta CJ. Systematic review of incidence and complications of herpes zoster: towards a global perspective. BMJ Open. 2014;4(6):e004833. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Bricout H, Haugh M, Olatunde O, Prieto RG. Herpes zoster-associated mortality in Europe: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:466. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Lal H, Cunningham AL, Godeaux O, Chlibek R, Diez-Domingo J, Hwang S, et al. Efficacy of an adjuvanted herpes zoster subunit vaccine in older adults. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(22):2087-2096. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Kitaichi M, Nagai S, Nishimura K, Itoh H, Asamoto H, Izumi T, et al. Pulmonary epithelioid haemangioendothelioma in 21 patients, including three with partial spontaneous regression. Eur Respir J. 1998;12(1):89-96. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Harvey M, Prosser LA, Rose AM, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Harpaz R. Aggregate health and economic burden of herpes zoster in the United States: illustrative example of a pain condition. Pain. 2020;161(2):361-368. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Li Z, Yin C, Wang H, Du W, Wang W, Xue F, et al. Incidence trend and disease burden of seven vaccine-preventable diseases in Shandong province, China, 2013-2017: findings from a population-based observational study. Vaccine X. 2022;10:100145. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Sun X, Wei Z, Lin H, Jit M, Li Z, Fu C. Incidence and disease burden of herpes zoster in the population aged ≥50 years in China: data from an integrated health care network. J Infect. 2021;82(2):253-260. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Amirthalingam G, Andrews N, Keel P, Mullett D, Correa A, de Lusignan S, et al. Evaluation of the effect of the herpes zoster vaccination programme 3 years after its introduction in England: a population-based study. Lancet Public Health. 2018;3(2):e82-e90. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Koshy E, Mengting L, Kumar H, Jianbo W. Epidemiology, treatment and prevention of herpes zoster: a comprehensive review. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2018;84(3):251-262. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Chiyaka ET, Nghiem VT, Zhang L, Deshpande A, Mullen PD, Le P. Cost-effectiveness of herpes zoster vaccination: a systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019;37(2):169-200. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Baker SD, Wirth M, Statkevich P, Reidenberg P, Alton K, Sartorius SE, et al. Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of 14C-temozolomide following oral administration to patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5(2):309-317. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Cotton AS. Applied Choice Analysis. Australia. UWA School of Agriculture and Environment; 1999.
    17. Brown KF, Kroll JS, Hudson MJ, Ramsay M, Green J, Long SJ, et al. Factors underlying parental decisions about combination childhood vaccinations including MMR: a systematic review. Vaccine. 2010;28(26):4235-4248. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Malik AA, McFadden SM, Elharake J, Omer SB. Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the US. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;26:100495. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Smotherman WP, Robinson SR. Habituation to chemosensory stimuli in the rat fetus: effects of endogenous kappa opioid activity. Behav Neurosci. 1993;107(4):611-617. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Damm O, Witte J, Greiner W. A systematic review of herpes zoster vaccine acceptance. Value Health. 2015;18(7):A592. [CrossRef]
    21. Patterson BJ, Myers K, Stewart A, Mange B, Hillson EM, Poulos C. Preferences for herpes zoster vaccination among adults aged 50 years and older in the United States: results from a discrete choice experiment. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2021;20(6):729-741. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Eilers R, de Melker HE, Veldwijk J, Krabbe PFM. Vaccine preferences and acceptance of older adults. Vaccine. 2017;35(21):2823-2830. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Zhang H, Zhang LR, Chu LC, Sun X, Jiang XW. Factors influencing herpes zoster vaccination among older people in China: results from a discrete choice experiment. Public Health. 2023;220:33-34. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Morelock MM, Pargellis CA, Graham ET, Lamarre D, Jung G. Time-resolved ligand exchange reactions: kinetic models for competitive inhibitors with recombinant human renin. J Med Chem. 1995;38(10):1751-1761. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Lavelle TA, Messonnier M, Stokley S, Kim D, Ramakrishnan A, Gebremariam A, et al. Use of a choice survey to identify adult, adolescent and parent preferences for vaccination in the United States. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019;3(1):51. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. de Bekker-Grob EW, Swait JD, Kassahun HT, Bliemer MCJ, Jonker MF, Veldwijk J, et al. Are healthcare choices predictable? the impact of discrete choice experiment designs and models. Value Health. Oct 2019;22(9):1050-1062. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. de Bekker-Grob EW, Donkers B, Bliemer MCJ, Veldwijk J, Swait JD. Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data? Soc Sci Med. 2020;246:112736. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. de Bekker-Grob EW, Hofman R, Donkers B, van Ballegooijen M, Helmerhorst TJM, Raat H, et al. Girls' preferences for HPV vaccination: a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2010;28(41):6692-6697. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Stamato TD, Jones C. Isolation of a lactic dehydrogenase-A-deficient CHO-K1 mutant by nylon cloth replica plating. Somatic Cell Genet. 1977;3(6):639-647. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Sadique MZ, Devlin N, Edmunds WJ, Parkin D. The effect of perceived risks on the demand for vaccination: results from a discrete choice experiment. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e54149. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Scher MG, Waechter CJ. Lipolytic cleavage of dolichyl oleate catalyzed by calf brain membranes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1981;99(2):675-681. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Bridges JFP, Hauber AB, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser LA, Regier DA, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health–a checklist: a report of the ISPOR good research practices for conjoint analysis task force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403-413. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Leng A, Maitland E, Wang S, Nicholas S, Liu R, Wang J. Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China. Vaccine. 2021;39(2):247-254. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Guo N, Zhang G, Zhu D, Wang J, Shi L. The effects of convenience and quality on the demand for vaccination: results from a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2017;35(21):2848-2854. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Mangham LJ, Hanson K, McPake B. How to do (or not to do) ... designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy Plan. Mar 2009;24(2):151-158. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Hodos W, Macko KA, Sommers DI. Interactions between components of the avian visual system. Behav Brain Res. 1982;5(2):157-173. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Viney R, Savage E, Louviere J. Empirical investigation of experimental design properties of discrete choice experiments in health care. Health Econ. 2005;14(4):349-362. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
    39. Lancsar E, Savage E. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. Health Econ. 2004;13(9):901-907. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Ratcliffe J. The use of conjoint analysis to elicit willingness-to-pay values: proceed with caution? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000;16(1):270-275. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Jonson R, Orme B. Getting the most from CBC. Sawtooth Software. 2003. URL: https://sawtoothsoftware.com/resources/technical-papers/getting-the-most-from-cbc [accessed 2024-06-05]
    42. McFadden D, Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J Appl Econ. 2000;15(5):447-470. [CrossRef]
    43. Li S, Gong T, Chen G, Liu P, Lai X, Rong H, et al. Parental preference for influenza vaccine for children in China: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open. 2022;12(6):e055725. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. de Bekker-Grob EW, Rose JM, Bliemer MCJ. A closer look at decision and analyst error by including nonlinearities in discrete choice models: implications on willingness-to-pay estimates derived from discrete choice data in healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31(12):1169-1183. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Verelst F, Willem L, Kessels R, Beutels P. Individual decisions to vaccinate one's child or oneself: a discrete choice experiment rejecting free-riding motives. Soc Sci Med. 2018;207:106-116. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Yigit M, Ozkaya-Parlakay A, Senel E. Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine refusal in parents. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021;40(4):e134-e136. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Poulos C, Curran D, Anastassopoulou A, de Moerlooze L. German travelers' preferences for travel vaccines assessed by a discrete choice experiment. Vaccine. 2018;36(7):969-978. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Essers BAB, van Helvoort-Postulart D, Prins MH, Neumann M, Dirksen CD. Does the inclusion of a cost attribute result in different preferences for the surgical treatment of primary basal cell carcinoma?: a comparison of two discrete-choice experiments. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(6):507-520. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Lv M, Shen Y, Li W, Wu J, Wen X, Zhu D, et al. Preferences of general practitioners for delivering adult vaccination: a discrete choice experiment. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023;19(1):2167439. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    DCE: discrete choice experiment
    HZ: herpes zoster
    WTP: willingness to pay

    Edited by A Mavragani; submitted 26.07.23; peer-reviewed by N Wickramasekera, Y Wang; comments to author 01.02.24; revised version received 21.02.24; accepted 16.05.24; published 09.08.24.

    Copyright

    ©Yiqi Xia, Ming Wang, Mingzheng Hu, Yanshang Wang, Beibei Yuan, Dawei Zhu, Ping He. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 09.08.2024.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.