This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

General Articles on Innovation and Technology in Public Health (52) Dementia and Cognitive Decline (419) Cognitive Training for the Elderly (82) Games for Cognitive Assessment (56)

Published on in Vol 9 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/46264, first published .
Association Between the Loss of Gait Harmony and Cognitive Impairment: Cross-Sectional Study

Association Between the Loss of Gait Harmony and Cognitive Impairment: Cross-Sectional Study

Association Between the Loss of Gait Harmony and Cognitive Impairment: Cross-Sectional Study

Authors of this article:

Ju-Young Choi1 Author Orcid Image ;   Sang-Won Ha2 Author Orcid Image ;   Da-Eun Jeong2 Author Orcid Image ;   Jaeho Lee1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Donghoon Kim1, 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Jin-Young Min4 Author Orcid Image ;   Kyoung-Bok Min1, 3, 5 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations (2) Metrics

    Original Paper

    1Department of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    2Department of Neurology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    3Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    4Veterans Medical Research Institute, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    5Institute of Health Policy and Management, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    *these authors contributed equally

    Corresponding Author:

    Kyoung-Bok Min, PhD

    Department of Preventive Medicine

    College of Medicine

    Seoul National University

    103 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu

    Seoul, 03080

    Republic of Korea

    Phone: 82 1036954330

    Email: minkb@snu.ac.kr


    Background: Functional limitations and disabilities have been associated with a decrease in cognitive function due to increasing age. Gait performance and cognitive function have been associated with gait variability in executive function, the phase domain in memory, and gait abnormalities in cognitive decline.

    Objective: Our study aimed to investigate whether gait harmony was associated with cognitive function in the older adult population. Moreover, we aimed to investigate whether gait harmony was associated with cognitive function and explore each cognitive function in a specific harmonic state.

    Methods: The study population included 510 adults aged ≥60 years who visited the Department of Neurology at the Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. Gait data were collected using a 3D motion capture device with a wireless inertial measurement unit system. For cognitive function assessments, we used the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-Core test, which evaluates the level of cognitive function or impairment in 5 cognitive domains.

    Results: In general, the association between the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-Core tests and the stance-to-swing ratio in the >1.63 ratio group yielded lower β coefficients than those in the 1.50-1.63 ratio group. After adjustment for confounders, the odds ratio (OR) for the Digit Symbol Coding test (adjusted OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.88) and the Korean version of the Color Word Stroop Test: 60 seconds (adjusted OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.89) for frontal and executive function were significantly lower for the >1.63 ratio group than the reference group.

    Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the gait phase ratio is a valuable indicator of walking deficits and may also be associated with cognitive impairment in older adults.

    JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e46264

    doi:10.2196/46264

    Keywords

    cognitive function; gait phase; physical performance; dementia; older adult; aging; asymmetric; balance; gait analysis; cognition; cognitive impairment; gait; gait pattern; aging 


    The global population is rapidly aging, and the number of people aged 65 years or older is expected to increase from 703 million in 2019 to 1.5 billion in 2050 [1]. With the increasing older adult population, age-related cognitive impairment has increased and will become a public health problem unless prevention and intervention are implemented [2]. The development of many neurodegenerative disorders is usually a feature of the older adult population in the context of aging [3], and age is known as the primary risk factor for many diseases such as Alzheimer disease (AD) and dementia [4,5]. Approximately 50 million people have been diagnosed with dementia, which is one of the leading causes of disability and mortality among aging adults [6]. Moreover, dementia resulting from cognitive decline is an irreversible process, and there are no effective treatments or drugs for dementia [7]. Therefore, it is important to identify factors that can delay the onset of cognitive impairment or impact cognitive outcomes.

    Human gait is complicated and divided into 5 primary modal domains: rhythm, phase, variability, pace, and base of support [8]. Safe and effective gaits are important markers throughout life [9]. In older individuals, gait is used as a predictor of health status [10], falls, activities of daily living [11,12], risk of dementia [13], and even risk of early mortality [14]. Functional limitations and disabilities have been associated with a decrease in cognitive function due to increasing age [15]; motor performance may be related to cognitive impairment and dementia [16,17]. Furthermore, impairment of the motor system, such as gait abnormalities, can lead to cognitive decline [16,17] or early stages of dementia with aging [18]. Gait performance and cognitive function have been associated with gait variability in executive function [19], the phase domain in memory [20], and gait abnormalities in cognitive decline [21]. An abnormal gait, which increases the risk of dementia in older adults, suggests low physical fitness in areas such as mobility [22] and balance [23,24]. Therefore, gait cannot be simply explained as an autonomic movement.

    A principal issue is that older adults who demonstrate an imbalance in gait are likely to be at a higher risk of cognitive impairment [25]. Gait harmony, which indicates the proportion of stance to swing in kinematic gait, is defined as the capacity to transform the symmetrical human body into alternated, synchronized, symmetric, and rhythmic movements [26]. Previous studies have shown that the proportion of stance to swing is reduced during fast walking and increases under pathological conditions such as Parkinson disease (PD) [27], stroke [28], and spastic cerebral palsy [29]. A ratio from stance to swing of 70% to 30% was found in patients with stroke [28], and a longer stance phase increased gait stability [30]. It has been suggested that a stance between 59% and 70% is a good compromise between fast and stable walking by the harmonic properties of the stance-to-swing ratio [30]. The harmonic ratio property is founded not only in various disparate physical and biological systems, including leaf disposition [31], nucleotide frequencies [32], and cell [33], but also in human sciences, such as body proportions [34] and aesthetic preferences [35]. However, there is a lack of evidence supporting the association between gait harmony and cognitive function.

    Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate whether gait harmony was associated with cognitive function in the older adult population. In addition, we aimed to explore each cognitive function in a specific harmonic state.


    Setting and Study Design

    A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. Individuals aged ≥60 years who visited the Department of Neurology between March and December 2021 were recruited in this study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) those concerned about cognitive decline, (2) those who could independently undergo all the clinical tests and respond to questionnaires, and (3) those who agreed to participate in this study. Individuals were excluded based on the following criteria: (1) a diagnosis of dementia (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes F00-F09 and G30); (2) diagnoses of brain infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, or PD; and (3) a diagnosis of another serious disease (eg, cancer or mental illness). Experienced neurological clinicians evaluated the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

    The participants were subjected to a health survey consisting of gait measurements, cognitive examinations, and questionnaires. The survey was conducted at the Veterans Medical Research Institute of the Veterans Health Service Medical Center. A total of 575 individuals volunteered to participate in this study and provided informed consent at enrollment. Of these, 65 participants subsequently dropped out of the study because they were younger than 60 years (n=5) or had missing data on variables (ie, sex, education level, BMI, gait measurements, and cognitive parameters; n=60). After these exclusions, 510 people were eligible for this study.

    Ethics Approval

    Study protocols were approved by the Institutional Ethics Review Board of the Veterans Health Service Medical Center (BOHUN 2021-02-024 and BOHUN 2021-01-066). All participants provided signed informed consent prior to study enrollment.

    Gait Analysis

    Kinematic data of gait parameters were collected using the NORAXON myoMOTION sensor, which is a 3D motion capture device used with a wireless inertial measurement unit (IMU) system. The IMU sensor plays a role in transmitting human movement data directly to the myoMOTION receiver to compute the angular changes of the selected body segments. In a particular space, the 3D rotation angles of each sensor on selected body segments were measured from the 3D accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer using fusion algorithms; these angles are also known as orientation or navigation angles. The sensor for angular orientation uses a robust fusion algorithm combining the elemental sensor component axes’ readings as quaternion element values. This technology mathematically combines and filters incoming source signals at the sensor level and transmits the 4 quaternions of each sensor. Then, using NORAXON’s software, the quaternion data are automatically converted into anatomical angles using a rigid body model with joint segments. NORAXON’s software also records each sensor’s orientation angles and linear acceleration. The system is intended to quantify angular changes of the involved joint and can mathematically derive the x, y, and z displacements in space from linear acceleration data and inverse kinematics modeling. Using this process, the algorithm uses a gyroscope and acceleration data from body-mounted sensors to identify the stance and swing phases in the gait cycle through the signal recorded at a sampling rate of 100-200 Hz. The recoded IMU data were added, filtered, and processed using the myoMOTION software to quantify angular changes in the joints, and the output was exported to Microsoft Excel files [36-38].

    For this study, 7 IMU sensors were attached to the participants’ feet, frontal tibia bones, quadriceps, and the sacrum on the left and right sides symmetrically (ie, 2 on the feet, 2 on the frontal tibia bones, 2 on the quadriceps, and 1 on the sacrum, respectively). Calibration was performed using an upright posture to determine the value of the 0° angle in the joints. The participants were instructed to walk at their usual pace for the measured distance (10 m), and walking start or stop points for the measured distance were marked on the floor. The participants started walking at the start signal and stopped walking by themselves at the stop point. However, owing to an acceleration and deceleration phase during the 10-m gait test, the first and last steps were removed.

    The data transmitted to the myoMOTION software comprised the kinematic parameters of gait variables including the automatically processed average signals for each stance and swing phase. The stance-to-swing ratio was calculated using the average signal values of the stance and swing phases (stance phase [%] / swing phase [%]) [30]. The total gait cycle comprises the stance and swing phases. The literature suggests that during stable human walking, with the total gait cycle set to 100%, the stance phase comprises 60% to 62% and the swing phase comprises 40% to 38%, equating to a ratio of 1.50-1.63 [39-41]. These values were then used to determine the harmonic gait group in this study. Therefore, gait ratios were stratified into 3 groups (<1.50, 1.50-1.63, or >1.63). The harmonic group included individuals in the 1.50-1.63 ratio range, whereas the nonharmonic group included those with the other ratios (<1.50 and >1.63).

    Cognition Evaluation

    Participants performed a brief version of the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery, named the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-Core (SNSB-C), which evaluates the level of cognitive function or impairment in the following 5 cognitive domains: attention, language and related functions, visuospatial functions, memory, and frontal and executive functions [42]. SNSB-C is made up of 14 subtests, including the Digit Span Test, a short version of the Korean-Boston Naming Test (S-K-BNT), Rey Complex Figure Test (RCFT), Seoul Verbal Learning Test: Delayed Recall (SVLT: DR), the Korean version of Color Word Stroop Test: 60 seconds (K-CWST: 60sec), Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT), Trail Making Test-Elderly: Part B (TMT-E: B), and Digit Symbol Coding [43]. Each SNSB-C score is expressed as standardized percentile, stratified for age, sex, and education.

    Other Variables

    The questionnaire information included age (≥60 years) and sex (male or female). Health behavior variables included smoking status (current, former, or never), alcohol consumption (drinker or nondrinker), vigorous exercises (yes or no), and BMI. BMI was calculated by dividing the individual’s weight (kg) by height squared (m2).

    Statistical Analyses

    Statistical differences between the characteristics of the study population were analyzed according to the stance-to-swing ratio (<1.50, 1.50-1.63, or >1.63 ratio group) using the proportion of physiologically comfortable human gait [30,40,41,44,45]. In the analysis, cognitive function and gait ratio were used as the dependent and independent variables, respectively. For each variable, the chi-square test and 2-tailed t test were performed for each group of participants. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between cognitive function tests and the stance-to-swing ratio in each group of gait phase ratio and to provide β coefficients and SEs. The logistic regression model provided odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs for each cognitive function test percentiles as the stance-to-swing ratio increased or decreased. The 1.50-1.63 ratio group was used as the reference. Regression models were adjusted for age, sex, education level, smoking status, alcohol consumption, vigorous exercises, and BMI. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute), and the statistical significance was established at α=.05.


    Participant Characteristics

    Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the study population according to the 3 stance-to-swing ratio groups. A total of 510 participants with a mean age of 74.1 (SD 5.6) years were included in the study. Of the participants, 34 (6.7%) were in the <1.50 ratio group, 122 (23.9%) were in the 1.50-1.63 ratio group, and 354 (69.4%) were in the >1.63 ratio group.

    Table 1. Characteristics of the study population according to the 3 stance-to-swing ratio groups.
    CharacteristicTotal population (n=510)Stance-to-swing ratio groupaP valueb



    		<1.501.50-1.63>1.63
    Participant, n (%)510 (100)34 (6.7)122 (23.9)354 (69.4)
    Age (year), mean (SD)74.1 (5.6)74.1 (5.2)73.7 (5.0)74.3 (5.8).56c
    Sex, n (%).57d

    		Male272 (53.3)17 (6.3)70 (25.7)185 (68)

    		Female238 (46.7)17 (7.1)52 (21.9)169 (71)
    Education, n (%).06d

    		Less than high school259 (50.8)13 (5)51 (19.7)195 (75.3)

    		High school118 (23.1)9 (7.6)34 (28.8)75 (63.6)

    		College or more133 (26.1)12 (9)37 (27.8)84 (63.2)
    Smoking status, n (%).66d

    		Current or former smoker196 (38.4)12 (6.1)51 (26)133 (67.9)

    		Never smoker314 (61.6)22 (7)71 (22.6)221 (70.4)
    Alcohol drinking, n (%).12d

    		Drinker308 (60.4)18 (5.8)83 (27)207 (67.2)

    		Nondrinker202 (39.6)16 (7.9)39 (19.3)147 (72.8)
    Vigorous intensity exercises for a week, n (%).045d

    		Yes101 (19.8)12 (11.9)26 (25.7)63 (62.4)

    		No409 (80.2)22 (5.4)96 (23.5)291 (71.2)
    BMI (kg/m2), mean (SD)24.9 (3.2)24.1 (2.5)23.9 (2.9)25.4 (3.2)<.001
    Gait phase (%), mean (SD)

    		Stance63.0 (2.1)59.0 (1.2)61.2 (0.5)64.0 (1.6)<.001c

    		Swing37.0 (2.1)41.0 (1.2)38.8 (0.5)36.0 (1.6)<.001c

    		Stance-to-swing1.7 (0.2)1.4 (1.2)1.6 (0.03)1.8 (0.1)<.001c

    aThe denominators of the percentages in these columns correspond to the n values in the “Total population” column of the same row.

    bThe P values are based on chi-square test for categorical variables and one-way ANOVA for numerical variables in the stance-to-swing ratio groups.

    cANOVA.

    dChi-square test.

    Cognitive Performance and Gait Balance

    Table 2 shows the mean (SE) of each SNSB-C test (percentile) data according to the stance-to-swing ratios. The Digit Symbol Coding (56.31 vs 61.65 vs 52.88; P=.02), TMT-E: B (61.77 vs 57.76 vs 51.49; P=.02), and K-CWST: 60sec (45.67 vs 48.72 vs 40.87; P=.03) tests for frontal and executive functions showed statistically significant differences among the stance-to-swing ratio groups. However, there were no differences in the other cognitive functions.

    Table 2. Mean (SE) of each Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-Core (SNSB-C) test (percentile) according to the stance-to-swing ratio groups.
    Function and testStance-to-swing ratio group, mean (SE)P valuea

    		<1.501.50-1.63>1.63
    Attention

    		Digit Span Test44.25 (4.88)50.22 (2.83)43.71 (1.54).11
    Visuospatial

    		RCFTb: copy65.16 (4.37)55.97 (2.44)55.98 (1.53).19
    Language

    		S-K-BNTc53.41 (5.11)58.57 (2.59)53.35 (1.47).20
    Memory

    		SVLT: DRd38.64 (5.58)32.95 (2.78)36.77 (1.63).44
    Frontal and executive

    		Digit Symbol Coding56.31 (4.97)61.65 (2.46)52.88 (1.61).02

    		COWATe: animal + ㄱ49.21 (4.88)46.45 (2.61)41.96 (1.50).16

    		TMT-E: Bf61.77 (3.27)57.76 (2.52)51.49 (1.49).02

    		K-CWST: 60secg45.67 (4.92)48.72 (2.64)40.87 (1.56).03

    aThe P values are based on one-way ANOVA for numerical variables in the stance-to-swing ratio groups.

    bRCFT: Rey Complex Figure Test.

    cS-K-BNT: short version of the Korean-Boston Naming Test.

    dSVLT: DR: Seoul Verbal Learning Test: Delayed Recall.

    eCOWAT: Controlled Oral Word Association Test.

    fTMT-E: B: Trail Making Test-Elderly: Part B.

    gK-CWST: 60sec: the Korean version of Color Word Stroop Test: 60 seconds.

    Association Between Cognitive Performance and Gait Balance

    Table 3 shows the estimated β coefficients (SE) of each SNSB-C test based on the stance-to-swing ratio groups. In the Digit Span Test for attention functions, a significant association was observed in the >1.63 ratio group (β=–6.514, SE 3.098; P=.04) before adjustment. The unadjusted β coefficients were significant in the >1.63 ratio group for the Digit Symbol Coding (β=–8.773, SE 3.098; P=.005), TMT-E: B (β=–6.269, SE 2.890; P=.03), and K-CWST: 60sec (β=–7.855, SE 3.075; P=.01) tests for frontal and executive functions. In the fully adjusted model, a significant β coefficient was observed in the >1.63 ratio group for the S-K-BNT for language function (β=–6.573, SE 2.813; P=.02). Compared with the reference, there were significant β coefficients in the >1.63 ratio group for the Digit Symbol Coding (β=–7.991, SE 3.028; P=.009) and K-CWST: 60sec (β=–8.083, SE 3.076; P=.009) tests for frontal and executive functions. In general, the association between the SNSB-C test data and the stance-to-swing ratio in the >1.63 ratio group yielded lower β coefficients than those in the 1.50-1.63 ratio group. Most β coefficients showed a decreasing relationship for the SNSB-C test data and the stance-to-swing ratio, whereas there were no significant associations in the <1.50 ratio group (all P>.05).

    Table 3. The estimated β coefficient (SE) of each Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-Core (SNSB-C) test based on the stance-to-swing ratio groups.
    Function and testUnadjusted model (stance-to-swing ratio group)Adjusteda model (stance-to-swing ratio group)

    		<1.501.50-1.63>1.63<1.501.50-1.63>1.63

    		Value, β (SE)P value
    		Value, β (SE)P valueValue, β (SE)P value
    		Value, β (SE)P value
    Attention

    		Digit Span Test–5.967 (5.723).30Refb–6.514 (3.098).04–5.474 (5.739).34Ref–4.141 (3.184).19
    Visuospatial

    		RCFTc: copy9.193 (5.461).09Ref0.014 (2.956)>.998.913 (5.460).10Ref0.981 (3.029).75
    Language

    		S-K-BNTd–5.160 (5.444).34Ref–5.215 (2.947).08–3.471 (5.071).49Ref–6.573 (2.813).02
    Memory

    		SVLT: DRe5.691 (5.979).34Ref3.817 (3.237).245.696 (5.724).32Ref3.479 (3.175).27
    Frontal and executive

    		Digit Symbol Coding–5.344 (5.706).35Ref–8.773 (3.089).005–4.092 (5.458).45Ref–7.991 (3.028).009

    		COWATf: animal + ㄱ2.766 (5.514).62Ref–4.486 (2.985).132.904 (5.538).60Ref–5.175 (3.072).09

    		TMT-E: Bg4.016 (5.338).45Ref–6.269 (2.890).035.552 (5.290).29Ref–5.206 (2.934).08

    		K-CWST: 60sech–3.049 (5.680).59Ref–7.855 (3.075).01–2.318 (5.545).68Ref–8.083 (3.076)0=.009

    aThis result was adjusted for age, sex, education, smoking status, alcohol consumption, vigorous exercises, and BMI.

    bRef: reference.

    cRCFT: Rey Complex Figure Test.

    dS-K-BNT: short version of the Korean-Boston Naming Test.

    eSVLT: DR: Seoul Verbal Learning Test: Delayed Recall.

    fCOWAT: Controlled Oral Word Association Test.

    gTMT-E: B: Trail Making Test-Elderly: Part B.

    hK-CWST: 60sec: the Korean version of Color Word Stroop Test: 60seconds.

    Figure 1 presents the distributions between SNSB-C tests and stance-to-swing ratio groups using box and scatter plots. Overall, the study participants in the >1.63 gait ratio group were distributed across all the percentiles for each SNSB-C test.

    The adjusted OR (95% CI) for each SNSB-C test according to the stance-to-swing ratio group is shown in Figure 2. After adjustment for age, sex, education, smoking status, alcohol consumption, vigorous exercises, and BMI, the adjusted OR for the Digit Symbol Coding (adjusted OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.88) and K-CWST: 60sec (adjusted OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.89) tests for frontal and executive function was significantly lower for the >1.63 ratio group than for the reference group (the 1.50-1.63 stance-to-swing ratio group). However, most cognitive function tests showed no differences according to the stance-to-swing ratio group.

    ‎
    Figure 1. The box and scatter plots of the gait ratio groups for each SNSB-C test. The red box and scatter plots represent the <1.50 ratio group, the green box and scatter plots represent the 1.50-1.63 ratio group, and the blue box and scatter plots represent the >1.63 ratio group. The red dots are the mean of each SNSB-C test percentile according to each gait ratio group: (A) Digit Span Test, (B) RCFT: copy, (C) S-K-BNT, (D) SVLT: DR, (E) Digit Symbol Xoding, (F) COWAT: animal + ㄱ, (G) TMT-E: B, and (H) K-CWST: 60 sec. COWAT: Controlled Oral Word Association Test; K-CWST: 60sec: the Korean version of Color Word Stroop Test: 60 seconds; RCFT: Rey Complex Figure Test; S-K-BNT: short version of the Korean-Boston Naming Test; SNSB-C: Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-Core; SVLT: DR: Seoul Verbal Learning Test: Delayed Recall; and TMT-E: B: Trail Making Test-Elderly: Part B.
    ‎
    Figure 2. Adjusted odds ratio (OR; 95% CI) of each Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-Core (SNSB-C) test according to the stance-to-swing ratio group. Adjusted for age, sex, education, smoking status, alcohol consumption, vigorous exercises, and BMI. *P<.001. COWAT: Controlled Oral Word Association Test; K-CWST: 60sec: the Korean version of Color Word Stroop Test: 60seconds; RCFT: Rey Complex Figure Test; S-K-BNT: short version of the Korean-Boston Naming Test; SVLT: DR: Seoul Verbal Learning Test: Delayed Recall; TMT-E: B: Trail Making Test-Elderly: Part B.

    Principal Findings

    This study investigated the association between cognitive function and gait harmony in older Korean adults. We found a significantly higher cognitive performance percentile in frontal and executive functions among participants in the harmonic stance-to-swing ratio group. Compared with participants that exhibited a harmonic gait ratio, the cognitive assessment percentile decreased in those who showed the nonharmonic gait ratio, especially for visuospatial, frontal, and executive functions. Specifically, the relationship between the Digit Symbol Coding and K-CWST: 60sec test data on frontal and executive functions and the gait phase ratio remained significant after controlling for covariates. This information supports our understanding that cognitive function is interrelated with gait harmony in the older adult population.

    Comparison With Prior Work and Clinical Implications

    Our findings on gait balance and cognitive function were partially consistent with the results of previous studies. According to a recent cross-sectional study by Noh et al [21] of 735 community-based individuals (aged 65-89 years), cognitive function was associated with the stance phase at a slower walking speed (β=0.088; P=.02). Based on a previous study in Italy on people with and without PD, alterations in gait ratio were expected; Peppe et al [27] suggested that compared with healthy participants, patients with PD have prolonged stance phases (patients with PD: 68.1% vs patients without PD: 63.6%; P<.001) [27]. Another study in 31 patients older than 55 years in China [46] investigated the relationship between gait characteristics and dementia, such as poststroke dementia (PSD) and AD. Ni et al [46] showed that in all gait tests, the percentage of time spent in the stance phase was longer (patients with PSD: 63.95% vs patients with AD: 63.09% vs healthy adults: 62.15%; P=.002) and in the swing phase was shorter (patients with PSD: 36.04% vs patients with AD: 36.91% vs healthy adults: 37.86%; P=.002) among patients with dementia than among healthy controls. Taken together, these studies highlight that older individuals with gait imbalance are relatively susceptible to a decrease in cognitive function.

    The mechanism underlying the relationship between proper gait proportion and cognition remains unclear. One possible explanation is that a well-balanced gait is related not only to the motor system, such as muscle strength, but also to cognition, such as memory, attention, executive function, and visuospatial capacity [47,48]. Attention and executive functions are significantly associated with gait speed in older adults with and without cognitive decline [49]. Poor attention and executive processing in the brain are correlated with white matter hyperintensity, which negatively affects gait pace, spatiality, and variability [50]. The variability of gait is related to the stance and swing phases, and the double support phase is more variable in the presence of poor balance. In memory and spatial functions, beyond the primary role of the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus, the induction of memory by hippocampal atrophy also influences rhythm, variability, and human balance control [51-53]. Gait reflects the health of individuals in compensating for changes in postural balance and is controlled by well-balanced neural circuits and specific brain structures, including the frontal lobes, basal ganglia, cerebellum, and sensory and motor systems [48,54,55]. Generally, during walking, the complexity of controlling redundant degrees of freedom of bilateral multijoint limbs is reduced by the nervous system [56]. Human gait is structured for specific phases of the gait leg movements [57] that can lead to the maintenance of the basic walking rhythm, which generates alternating activity of the flexor and extensor motoneurons [58]. Simple alternation of flexor and extensor activity is converted into more complex and adaptable walking patterns by hippocampal neurons that receive serotonergic projections from the median raphe nuclei. The projections of serotonergic neurons of the brain stem that innervate the spinal cord stepping generator play a role in activating and influencing the walking rhythm [59]. A decrease in serotonin levels in cerebrospinal fluid and severe gait and posture disorders have been observed in patients with PD [60]. Hence, the stance-to-swing ratios under pathological conditions may be far from the value of the harmonic proportion value.

    Strengths and Limitations

    To our knowledge, this study demonstrated an association between gait harmony and cognitive function, which has not been reported previously. Additionally, a strength of this study is the use of noninvasive measurement as an index for predicting decreased cognitive function. Moreover, we showed association between gait and cognitive performance using the SNSB-C tests, which includes 5 cognitive functions (ie, attention, visuospatial, language, memory, and frontal and executive). However, the study had some limitations. First, as this was a cross-sectional study, it is difficult to confirm the causal relationship between gait harmony and cognitive function. Therefore, we cannot indicate trends or changes from normal cognitive function to cognitive dysfunction. Second, the study was not free from bias due to self-reported data. As this study was based on an observational investigation, the questions asked to collect data may concern private or sensitive topics, such as education level, smoking status, and alcohol consumption. Thus, self-reporting data can be affected by social desirability. Moreover, we cannot rule out that some variables affecting cognition, such as dietary intake, medication, and occupation, were not analyzed in the statistical model. These unmeasured variables may be residual confounders.

    Conclusions

    Dementia is one of the most important health issues associated with aging. However, the diagnosis of dementia is expensive and involves complex measurements. Gait, on the other hand, can be measured noninvasively, comparatively conveniently, and rapidly. Therefore, this study can be important for public health management, in that gait performance assessment can be used to screen for potential cognitive impairment.

    Our study found that low cognitive function was related to a nonharmonic gait ratio in participants aged 60 years or older in South Korea. In contrast, harmonic gait ratio was associated with good cognitive performance. These findings suggest that the gait ratio may be a valuable indicator of cognitive impairment. The presence of a nonharmonic gait ratio that is different from the general gait ratio may be an indirect marker of cognitive decline, independent of confounding factors in the older adult population. However, more research is required to replicate our results and establish possible mechanisms of a relationship between proper gait ratio and cognitive function.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors would like to acknowledge all of the participants and study staffs. This research was supported by the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) and Korea Dementia Research Center (KDRC), funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare and Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (grant HU20C0487). This work was supported by Veterans Health Service Medical Center Research Grant, Republic of Korea (VHSMC 22043).

    Authors' Contributions

    JYM and KBM are co-corresponding authors. JYC, SWH, DEJ, JL, DK, JYM, and KBM conceived the study. JYC, JYM, and KBM conducted all statistical analyses. JL and DK reviewed the results. SWH and DEJ provided expertise on information governance and data management. JYC wrote the first draft of the manuscript. SWH, DEJ, JYM, and KBM commented on and reviewed the final draft of the manuscript. All authors agree on the final version of the manuscript.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    1. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Ageing 2019. New York, NY. United Nations; Oct 2020;73.
    2. Hebert LE, Weuve J, Scherr PA, Evans DA. Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010-2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology. May 07, 2013;80(19):1778-1783. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Juan SMA, Adlard PA. Ageing and cognition. Subcell Biochem. Mar 20, 2019;91:107-122. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. Trevisan K, Cristina-Pereira R, Silva-Amaral D, Aversi-Ferreira TA. Theories of aging and the prevalence of Alzheimer's disease. Biomed Res Int. Jun 16, 2019;2019:9171424-9171429. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Wu JW, Yaqub A, Ma Y, Koudstaal W, Hofman A, Ikram MA, et al. Biological age in healthy elderly predicts aging-related diseases including dementia. Sci Rep. Aug 05, 2021;11(1):15929. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. The global dementia observatory reference guide. World Health Organization. 2018. URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272669 [accessed 2023-06-23]
    7. Dong X, Li S, Sun J, Li Y, Zhang D. Association of coffee, decaffeinated coffee and caffeine intake from coffee with cognitive performance in older adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011-2014. Nutrients. Mar 20, 2020;12(3):840. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Hollman JH, McDade EM, Petersen RC. Normative spatiotemporal gait parameters in older adults. Gait Posture. May 2011;34(1):111-118. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Lord S, Galna B, Verghese J, Coleman S, Burn D, Rochester L. Independent domains of gait in older adults and associated motor and nonmotor attributes: validation of a factor analysis approach. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. Jul 18, 2013;68(7):820-827. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Cesari M, Kritchevsky SB, Penninx BWHJ, Nicklas BJ, Simonsick EM, Newman AB, et al. Prognostic value of usual gait speed in well-functioning older people--results from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. Oct 2005;53(10):1675-1680. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Andrieu S, Bauer J, Beauchet O, Bonnefoy M, et al. Gait speed at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health Aging. Dec 3, 2009;13(10):881-889. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    12. Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity. J Intern Med. Sep 2004;256(3):183-194. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Verghese J, Wang C, Lipton RB, Holtzer R, Xue X. Quantitative gait dysfunction and risk of cognitive decline and dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Sep 01, 2007;78(9):929-935. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, et al. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA. Jan 05, 2011;305(1):50-58. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Tait JL, Duckham RL, Milte CM, Main LC, Daly RM. Influence of sequential vs. simultaneous dual-task exercise training on cognitive function in older adults. Front Aging Neurosci. Nov 07, 2017;9:368. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Verghese J, Lipton RB, Hall CB, Kuslansky G, Katz MJ, Buschke H. Abnormality of gait as a predictor of non-Alzheimer's dementia. N Engl J Med. Nov 28, 2002;347(22):1761-1768. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Wang L, Larson EB, Bowen JD, van Belle G. Performance-based physical function and future dementia in older people. Arch Intern Med. May 22, 2006;166(10):1115-1120. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Albers MW, Gilmore GC, Kaye J, Murphy C, Wingfield A, Bennett DA, et al. At the interface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. Jan 2015;11(1):70-98. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Hausdorff JM, Yogev G, Springer S, Simon ES, Giladi N. Walking is more like catching than tapping: gait in the elderly as a complex cognitive task. Exp Brain Res. Aug 28, 2005;164(4):541-548. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Verlinden VJ, van der Geest JN, Hofman A, Ikram MA. Cognition and gait show a distinct pattern of association in the general population. Alzheimers Dement. May 12, 2014;10(3):328-335. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Noh B, Youm C, Lee M, Park H. Associating gait phase and physical fitness with global cognitive function in the aged. Int J Environ Res Public Health. Jul 03, 2020;17(13):4786. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Ayers E, Verghese J. Gait dysfunction in motoric cognitive risk syndrome. J Alzheimers Dis. Sep 19, 2019;71(s1):S95-S103. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Mazoteras Muñoz V, Abellan van Kan G, Cantet C, Cortes F, Ousset PJ, Rolland Y, et al. Gait and balance impairments in Alzheimer disease patients. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. Jan 2010;24(1):79-84. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Kearney FC, Harwood RH, Gladman JR, Lincoln N, Masud T. The relationship between executive function and falls and gait abnormalities in older adults: a systematic review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. May 23, 2013;36(1-2):20-35. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Lindh-Rengifo M, Jonasson SB, Ullén S, Stomrud E, Palmqvist S, Mattsson-Carlgren N, et al. Components of gait in people with and without mild cognitive impairment. Gait Posture. Mar 2022;93:83-89. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Iosa M, Marro T, Paolucci S, Morelli D. Stability and harmony of gait in children with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. Jan 2012;33(1):129-135. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Peppe A, Chiavalon C, Pasqualetti P, Crovato D, Caltagirone C. Does gait analysis quantify motor rehabilitation efficacy in Parkinson's disease patients? Gait Posture. Sep 2007;26(3):452-462. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Kuan T, Tsou J, Su F. Hemiplegic gait of stroke patients: the effect of using a cane. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Jul 1999;80(7):777-784. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Wang X, Wang Y. Gait analysis of children with spastic hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Neural Regen Res. Jul 15, 2012;7(20):1578-1584. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Iosa M, Fusco A, Marchetti F, Morone G, Caltagirone C, Paolucci S, et al. The golden ratio of gait harmony: repetitive proportions of repetitive gait phases. Biomed Res Int. Jun 4, 2013;2013:918642-918647. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. Okabe T. Physical phenomenology of phyllotaxis. J Theor Biol. Jul 07, 2011;280(1):63-75. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Yamagishi MEB, Shimabukuro AI. Nucleotide frequencies in human genome and fibonacci numbers. Bull Math Biol. Apr 10, 2008;70(3):643-653. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    33. Staff L, Hurd P, Reale L, Seoighe C, Rockwood A, Gehring C. The hidden geometries of the Arabidopsis thaliana epidermis. PLoS One. Sep 11, 2012;7(9):e43546. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Ferring V, Pancherz H. Divine proportions in the growing face. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. Oct 2008;134(4):472-479. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Russell PA. The aesthetics of rectangle proportion: effects of judgment scale and context. Am J Psychol. 2000;113(1):27-42. [Medline]
    36. Alothmany N, Khan A, Alnowaimi M, Morfeq AH, Hafez EA. Accuracy of joint angles tracking using markerless motion system. Journal of LaTeX Templates. Preprint posted online on September 21, 2014. 2023 [FREE Full text]
    37. Struzik A, Konieczny G, Stawarz M, Grzesik K, Winiarski S, Rokita A. Relationship between lower limb angular kinematic variables and the effectiveness of sprinting during the acceleration phase. Appl Bionics Biomech. Jul 19, 2016;2016:7480709-7480709. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Szpala A, Kołodziej M, Struzik A, Jasiński R, Bałchanowski KJ, Pietraszewski B, et al. Selected spatiotemporal and joint angle parameters in normal gait and nordic walking with classical and mechatronic poles in aspects of sex differences. Biomed Res Int. Dec 13, 2022;2022:7905120-7905129. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Perry J, Slack T, Davids JR. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. J Pediatr Orthop. Nov 1992;12(6):815. [CrossRef]
    40. Winter D, Patla AE, Frank JS, Walt SE. Biomechanical walking pattern changes in the fit and healthy elderly. Phys Ther. Jun 1990;70(6):340-347. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Kirtley C. Clinical Gait Analysis: Theory and Practice. London, UK. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.
    42. Kang Y, Na DL, Hahn S. Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-Core (SNSB-C). Incheon, Republic of Korea. Human Brain Research & Consulting Co; 2015.
    43. Jahng S, Na DL, Kang Y. Constructing a composite score for the Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-Core. Dement Neurocognitive Disord. Dec 31, 2015;14(4):137-142. [CrossRef]
    44. Iosa M, Mazzà C, Frusciante R, Zok M, Aprile I, Ricci E, et al. Mobility assessment of patients with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). Dec 2007;22(10):1074-1082. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Shemmell J, Johansson J, Portra V, Gottlieb GL, Thomas JS, Corcos DM. Control of interjoint coordination during the swing phase of normal gait at different speeds. J Neuroeng Rehabil. Apr 27, 2007;4(1):10. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Ni L, Lv W, Sun D, Sun Y, Sun Y, Xu X, et al. Pathological gait signatures of post-stroke dementia with toe-off and heel-to-ground angles discriminate from Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. Nov 18, 2021;13:766884. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Mc Ardle R, Morris R, Wilson J, Galna B, Thomas AJ, Rochester L. What can quantitative gait analysis tell us about dementia and its subtypes? a structured review. J Alzheimers Dis. Nov 7, 2017;60(4):1295-1312. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Allali G, Montembeault M, Brambati SM, Bherer L, Blumen HM, Launay CP, et al. Brain structure covariance associated with gait control in aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. Apr 23, 2019;74(5):705-713. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Verghese J, Robbins M, Holtzer R, Zimmerman M, Wang C, Xue X, et al. Gait dysfunction in mild cognitive impairment syndromes. J Am Geriatr Soc. Jul 2008;56(7):1244-1251. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Wilson J, Allcock L, Mc Ardle R, Taylor J, Rochester L. The neural correlates of discrete gait characteristics in ageing: a structured review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. May 2019;100:344-369. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. Scherder E, Eggermont L, Swaab D, van Heuvelen M, Kamsma Y, de Greef M, et al. Gait in ageing and associated dementias; its relationship with cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. Jan 2007;31(4):485-497. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Zimmerman ME, Lipton RB, Pan JW, Hetherington HP, Verghese J. MRI- and MRS-derived hippocampal correlates of quantitative locomotor function in older adults. Brain Res. Sep 29, 2009;1291:73-81. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Beauchet O, Launay CP, Sekhon H, Montembeault M, Allali G. Association of hippocampal volume with gait variability in pre-dementia and dementia stages of Alzheimer disease: results from a cross-sectional study. Exp Gerontol. Jan 2019;115:55-61. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    54. Takakusaki K. Neurophysiology of gait: from the spinal cord to the frontal lobe. Mov Disord. Sep 15, 2013;28(11):1483-1491. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    55. Tian Q, Chastan N, Bair W, Resnick SM, Ferrucci L, Studenski SA. The brain map of gait variability in aging, cognitive impairment and dementia-a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. Mar 2017;74(Pt A):149-162. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    56. Ivanenko YP, Cappellini G, Dominici N, Poppele RE, Lacquaniti F. Modular control of limb movements during human locomotion. J Neurosci. Oct 10, 2007;27(41):11149-11161. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    57. Zehr EP. Neural control of rhythmic human movement: the common core hypothesis. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. Jan 2005;33(1):54-60. [Medline]
    58. Ivanenko Y, Poppele R, Lacquaniti F. Distributed neural networks for controlling human locomotion: lessons from normal and SCI subjects. Brain Res Bull. Jan 15, 2009;78(1):13-21. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    59. Takahashi H, Takada Y, Nagai N, Urano T, Takada A. Serotonergic neurons projecting to hippocampus activate locomotion. Brain Res. Jun 30, 2000;869(1-2):194-202. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    60. Iacono RP, Kuniyoshi SM, Ahlman JR, Zimmerman GJ, Maeda G, Pearlstein RD. Concentrations of indoleamine metabolic intermediates in the ventricular cerebrospinal fluid of advanced Parkinson's patients with severe postural instability and gait disorders. J Neural Transm (Vienna). Apr 1997;104(4-5):451-459. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    AD: Alzheimer disease
    COWAT: Controlled Oral Word Association Test
    IMU: inertial measurement unit
    K-CWST: 60sec: the Korean version of Color Word Stroop Test: 60 seconds
    OR: odds ratio
    PD: Parkinson disease
    PSD: poststroke dementia
    RCFT: Rey Complex Figure Test
    S-K-BNT: short version of the Korean-Boston Naming Test
    SNSB-C: Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery-Core
    SVLT DR:: Seoul Verbal Learning Test: Delayed Recall
    TMT-E B:: Trail Making Test-Elderly: Part B

    Edited by A Mavragani, T Sanchez; submitted 04.02.23; peer-reviewed by M Iosa, J Curcic; comments to author 01.03.23; revised version received 20.03.23; accepted 15.06.23; published 10.07.23.

    Copyright

    ©Ju-Young Choi, Sang-Won Ha, Da-Eun Jeong, Jaeho Lee, Donghoon Kim, Jin-Young Min, Kyoung-Bok Min. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 10.07.2023.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.