This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Longitudinal and Cohort Studies in Public Health (316) Hypertension Prevention and Treatment (229)

Published on in Vol 9 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/45324, first published .
Temporal and Bidirectional Association Between Blood Pressure Variability and Arterial Stiffness: Cross-Lagged Cohort Study

Temporal and Bidirectional Association Between Blood Pressure Variability and Arterial Stiffness: Cross-Lagged Cohort Study

Temporal and Bidirectional Association Between Blood Pressure Variability and Arterial Stiffness: Cross-Lagged Cohort Study

Authors of this article:

Zhiyuan Wu1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Haiping Zhang1 Author Orcid Image ;   Yutao Wang3 Author Orcid Image ;   Zhiwei Li1 Author Orcid Image ;   Xia Li4 Author Orcid Image ;   Lixin Tao1 Author Orcid Image ;   Xiuhua Guo1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (2) Tweetations (2) Metrics

    Original Paper

    1School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    2Center of Precision Health, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia

    3Shanghai Fufan Information Technology Ltd Co, Shanghai, China

    4Department of Mathematics and Statistics, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia

    *these authors contributed equally

    Corresponding Author:

    Xiuhua Guo, PhD

    School of Public Health

    Capital Medical University

    No.10 Xitoutiao, Youanmen Street

    Beijing, 100069

    China

    Phone: 86 83911508

    Email: statguo@ccmu.edu.cn


    Background: The causal relationship between blood pressure variability (BPV) and arterial stiffness remains debated.

    Objective: This study aimed to explore the temporal and bidirectional associations between long-term BPV and arterial stiffness using a cohort design with multiple surveys.

    Methods: Participants from the Beijing Health Management Cohort who underwent health examinations from visit 1 (2010-2011) to visit 5 (2018-2019) were enrolled in this study. Long-term BPV was defined as intraindividual variation using the coefficient of variation (CV) and SD. Arterial stiffness was measured by brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV). The bidirectional relationship between BPV and arterial stiffness was explored using cross-lagged analysis and linear regression models, with records before and after visit 3 categorized as phase 1 and phase 2, respectively.

    Results: Of the 1506 participants, who were a mean of 56.11 (SD 8.57) years old, 1148 (76.2%) were male. The cross-lagged analysis indicated that the standardized coefficients of BPV at phase 1 directing to the baPWV level at phase 2 were statistically significant but not vice-versa. The adjusted regression coefficients of the CV were 4.708 (95% CI 0.946-8.470) for systolic blood pressure, 3.119 (95% 0.166-6.073) for diastolic pressure, and 2.205 (95% CI 0.300-4.110) for pulse pressure. The coefficients of the SD were 4.208 (95% CI 0.177-8.239) for diastolic pressure and 4.247 (95% CI 0.448-8.046) for pulse pressure. The associations were predominant in the subgroup with hypertension, but we did not observe any significant association of baPWV level with subsequent BPV indices.

    Conclusions: The findings supported a temporal relationship between long-term BPV and arterial stiffness level, especially among people with hypertension.

    JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023;9:e45324

    doi:10.2196/45324

    Keywords

    blood pressure variability; brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; arterial stiffness; cross-lagged panel analysis 


    Hypertension is one of the most significant risk factors for heart failure, atrial fibrillation, stroke, chronic kidney disease, and overall cardiovascular disease (CVD), with a largely increasing health burden [1,2]. According to the Chinese Hypertension Survey, between 2012 and 2015, the prevalence of hypertension was 23.2% (approximately 244.5 million) among adults and over 55% in people aged 65 and older [3], imposing a significant life loss [4,5]. Arterial stiffness is an important pathological mechanism of high blood pressure that leads to various adverse outcomes [4,6]. Arterial stiffness, as an independent predictor of CVD, could cause microvascular damage to organs rich in low-resistance vascular tissue (kidney, brain, etc), affecting the myocardium and vascular function through afterload [7,8]. Both arterial stiffness and blood pressure are aggravated with aging and can lead to cardiovascular events. In addition, dietary and lifestyle factors are also important causes of arterial stiffness progression, and studies have shown that a plant-based diet can significantly reduce arterial stiffness and blood pressure levels [9-14]. Therefore, the precise identification of arterial stiffness risk markers for primary prevention and personalized treatment based on modifiable factors is essential to prevent the progression of arterial stiffness and reduce the risk of CVD.

    Previous studies have shown that elevated blood pressure precedes arterial stiffness [15]. In addition to blood pressure, blood pressure variability (BPV), such as visit-to-visit BPV, day-to-day home BPV, and 24-hour ambulatory BPV, is related to CVD [16-19]. Numerous studies have shown that all types of BPV are positively associated with adverse cardiovascular events (coronary heart disease, stroke, CVD, mortality, etc) in people with hypertension [20-22], indicating the potential predictive capacity of BPV for an unfavorable arterial stiffness level. On the other hand, several studies have shown that age-dependent arterial stiffness could also cause exaggerated BPV [23,24]. An assessment of the temporal association between BPV and arterial stiffness can facilitate the early identification of cardiovascular risk and subsequent intervention [25]. However, the cross-sectional design of most existing studies cannot indicate the temporal relationship between BPV and arterial stiffness [24,26,27]; thus, the causal association between BPV and arterial stiffness needs further research [28].

    In this study, we aimed to comprehensively investigate the temporal and bidirectional relationship between long-term BPV and arterial stiffness using a cross-lagged panel design and further explore the interaction effect of hypertension status in a large cohort.


    Study Design and Population

    This study included participants from the Beijing Health Management Cohort, which is a large-scale longitudinal cohort study investigating the risk factors and biomarkers of cardiometabolic disorders. Our study is a secondary analysis of the Beijing Health Management Cohort under a longitudinal cohort design with multiple consecutive surveys. In total, 2381 individuals aged 18 years or above underwent multiple comprehensive biennial health examinations at visit 1 (2010-2011), visit 2 (2012-2013), visit 3 (2014-2015), visit 4 (2016-2017), and visit 5 (2018-2019), and arterial stiffness data were collected. We excluded 760 individuals with missing blood pressure data at any health visit. To minimize the possible effect of reverse causality, 115 participants with CVD (coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, and stroke) at visit 3 (as the baseline) were further excluded. Finally, this study was restricted to a subset of 1506 participants with complete data. The period from visit 1 to visit 3 was defined as phase 1, and the period from visit 3 to visit 5 was defined as phase 2, as illustrated in Figure S1 of Multimedia Appendix 1.

    Ethics Approval

    This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Capital Medical University (2020SY031). The study data were anonymous. All participants provided written informed consent before taking part in this study.

    Measurement and Data Collection

    The participants’ sociodemographic characteristics and lifestyle and health-related information were collected via a standard questionnaire by our trained staff, including age, sex, education, smoking status, drinking status, regular physical activity, diagnosis history of diseases, and medication information. Educational level was categorized as no or some primary school, middle school or high school, and bachelor’s degree or above. Smoking was defined as “current,” “former,” and “never.” Drinking status was defined as “currently drinking” and “not currently drinking.” Regular physical activity was defined as having moderate or intense activity at work or during leisure time more than 4 times and 80 minutes per week. Vigorous activities make breathing much harder than normal and include heavy lifting, digging, plowing, aerobics, fast bicycling, and cycling with a heavy load. Moderate activities make breathing somewhat harder than normal and include carrying light loads, bicycling at a regular pace, mopping the floor, doing Taiji, and walking briskly. Mild activity refers to waking at work, at home, walking to travel from place to place, and any other walking that one might do solely for recreation, sport, exercise, or leisure [29].

    The physical and biochemical examination data were acquired from the electronic medical record system. BMI was calculated as weight (in kg)/height (in meters squared). Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were presented as the average of 2 measurements on the right arm using a sphygmomanometer after resting for at least 10 minutes. The pulse pressure (PP) was calculated as SBP minus DBP. Hypertension status was defined as SBP ≥140 mmHg or DBP ≥90 mmHg or use of any antihypertensive medication or self-reported history of hypertension according to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC-7) criteria [30]. Data on serum total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), fasting blood glucose (FBG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were also collected in this study. Diabetes was defined as FBG ≥7.0 mmol/l, HbA1c ≥6.5%, or the use of any glucose-lowering medication or self-reported history of diabetes according to the American Diabetes Association [31]. Moreover, according to the Guidelines on Prevention and Treatment of Dyslipidemia for Chinese Adults [32], dyslipidemia was defined as triglyceride ≥2.3 mmol/l, TC ≥6.2 mmol/l, LDL-C ≥4.1 mmol/l, HDL-C <1.0 mmol/l, any lipid-lowering medication or self-reported history of dyslipidemia.

    Assessment of BPV and Arterial Stiffness

    BPV was assessed at phase 1 (visit 1 to visit 3) and phase 2 (visit 3 to visit 5). Long-term BPV was defined as the intraindividual variation in SBP, DBP, and PP at 3 visits and measured by the coefficient of variation (CV) and SD. The mean value of 3 blood pressure indices at each phase was also calculated.

    The arterial stiffness level was measured by brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), which is a simple, noninvasive, automatic method widely used in population-based studies. The baPWV was measured with an Omron Colin BP-203RPE III device (Omron Health Care). The time interval between the wave front of the brachial waveform and the ankle waveform is expressed as the time interval between the brachium and ankle (∆Tba). La indicates the path length from the suprasternal notch to the ankle, and Lb refers to the path length from the suprasternal notch to the brachium based on the height of the subjects. The final baPWV was calculated as (La-Lb)/∆Tba, which has been previously described [33]. The arterial stiffness level was defined as the mean of baPWV measurements at phases 1 and 2.

    Statistical Analyses

    Baseline characteristics were presented as the mean (SD), median (IQR P25-P75), or number (percentage), as appropriate. We used the cross-lagged panel model to analyze the temporal relationship between BPV and baPWV levels. The lagged effect between the observed variables, the correlation between the variables at each phase, and the residual variance of the observed variables were estimated in the cross-lagged panel analysis, which elucidates the temporal relationship between correlated variables and indicates the precursor variable [34,35].

    Then, a multivariable linear regression model was used to estimate the bidirectional associations between BPV and baPWV levels. We calculated the regression coefficients of BPV indices at phase 1, with baPWV at phase 2 as the independent variable, and the coefficients of baPWV level at phase 1, with BPV indices at phase 2 as the independent variable. To adjust for potential confounding factors, three models were established: (1) model 1 was adjusted for the individual-level mean blood pressure; (2) model 2 was adjusted for mean blood pressure, age, and sex; and (3) model 3 was further adjusted for BMI, education level, smoking, drinking, physical activity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, triglyceride, TC, FBG, HbA1c, and hs-CRP. In total, there were 17 variables in the regression model. Thus, a group of 1506 participants in this study could satisfy the sample size requirement given the principle of 10 samples per variable in the regression model [36]. Furthermore, the blood pressure at visit 3 was adjusted in the models in place of the mean blood pressure value in the sensitivity analysis. The difference was considered statistically significant at 2-sided P<.05, and a 95% CI was provided.

    In addition, we analyzed the association of BPV with arterial stiffness levels in the subgroups with and without hypertension. The use of antihypertensive medication was additionally adjusted for in the subgroup with hypertension, considering that antihypertensive agents are an important determinant of BPV and are related to arterial stiffness levels. The difference was considered statistically significant at 2-sided P<.1, and a 90% CI was provided in the subgroup analysis [37].

    All the analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.1.0; R Foundation for Statistical Computing), using the packages lavaan for cross-lagged panel analysis and ggplot2 for visualization.


    Characteristics

    Among the 1506 participants, the mean age was 56.11 (SD 8.57) years, and 661 (43.9%) were diagnosed with hypertension at visit 3. The median value of the cumulative average level of baPWV was 1395.50 (IQR 1298.12-1544.34) cm/s at phase 1 and 1438.25 (IQR 1344.00-1588.67) cm/s at phase 2. Detailed characteristics of the study population and the variability indices of blood pressure are summarized in Tables 1 and 2, respectively.

    Table 1. Characteristics of the study population (N=1506) at baseline (visit 3).
    CharacteristicsVariables
    Age (years), mean (SD)56.11 (8.57)
    Sex, n (%)

    		Male1148 (76.2)

    		Female358 (23.8)
    BMIa (kg/m2), mean (SD)25.67 (2.90)
    Education level, n (%)

    		Primary122 (8.1)

    		Secondary794 (52.7)

    		Postsecondary590 (39.2)
    Physical activity, n (%)751 (49.9)
    Smoking, n (%)

    		None851 (56.5)

    		Former218 (14.5)

    		Current437 (29.0)
    Current drinking, n (%)931 (61.8)
    Hypertension, n (%)661 (43.9)
    Antihypertensive medication, n (%)507 (33.7)
    Diabetes, n (%)250 (16.6)
    Dyslipidemia, n (%)667 (44.3)
    SBPb (mmHg), mean (SD)122.09 (14.59)
    DBPc (mmHg), mean (SD)71.05 (9.68)
    Fasting plasma glucosed (mmol/L), mean (SD)5.58 (1.04)
    Glycated hemoglobin, mean (SD)5.71 (0.63)
    Triglycerided (mmol/L), mean (SD)1.63 (0.99)
    TCd (mmol/L), mean (SD)4.80 (0.86)
    hs-CRPe (mg/L), median (IQR)0.69 (0.28-1.27)

    aCalculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

    bSBP: systolic blood pressure.

    cDBP: diastolic blood pressure.

    dTC: total cholesterol. To convert fasting plasma glucose to mg/dl, multiply by 18; to convert triglyceride to mg/dl, multiply by 88.6; to convert TC to mg/dl, multiply by 38.66.

    ehs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

    Table 2. BPVa and arterial stiffness parameters.
    BPV measurementsPhase 1Phase 2
    CVb of SBPc, median (IQR)5.57 (2.99-8.74)5.81 (3.51-8.85)
    CV of DBPd, median (IQR)7.06 (3.67-10.95)6.60 (3.98-10.18)
    CV of PPe, median (IQR)10.88(6.02-16.62)10.70(6.29-15.71)
    SD of SBP, median (IQR)7.00 (3.54-10.99)7.07 (4.24-10.61)
    SD of DBP, median (IQR)4.95 (2.83-7.98)4.62 (2.83-7.09)
    SD of PP, median (IQR)5.29(2.83-8.14)5.29(3.06-7.78)
    baPWVf level, median (IQR), cm/s1395.50 (1298.12-1544.34)1438.25 (1344.00-1588.67)

    aBPV: blood pressure variability.

    bCV: coefficient of variation.

    cSBP: systolic blood pressure.

    dDBP: diastolic blood pressure.

    ePP: pulse pressure.

    fbaPWV: brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity.

    Temporal Relationship Between BPV and baPWV

    Assessments of BPV indices and baPWV at phase 1 and phase 2 constituted a typical cross-lagged panel design. Figure 1 presents the association of BPV indices at phase 1 with baPWV level at phase 2 and the association of baPWV at phase 1 with the BPV indices at phase 2. The standardized coefficients of the CV of SBP, DBP, and PP were 0.557, 0.349, and 0.320, respectively, and the SDs of SBP, DBP, and PP were 0.186, 0.169, and 0.918, respectively, to the follow-up baPWV level (all P<.01), while the standardized coefficients of baPWV level at phase 1 to the subsequent BPV indices were all weak and insignificant.

    ‎
    Figure 1. Bidirectional analysis of blood pressure variability (BPV) indices and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) level by cross-lagged panel analysis. β1: baPWV at phase 1→baPWV at phase 2; β2: BPV at phase 1→baPWV at phase 2; β3: baPWV at phase 1→BPV at phase 2; β4: BPV at phase 1→BPV at phase 2; r1: correlation coefficient between BPV and baPWV at phase 1; r2: correlation coefficient between BPV and baPWV at phase 2. A: BPV was measured by coefficient of variation (CV) of systolic blood pressure (SBP); B: BPV was measured by SD of SBP; C: BPV was measured by CV of diastolic blood pressure (DBP); D: BPV was measured by SD of DBP; E: BPV was measured by CV of pulse pressure (PP); F: BPV was measured by SD of PP. a means P<.05; b means P<.01; c means P<.001.

    Bidirectional Relationship Between BPV and baPWV

    In the fully adjusted model (model 3), a 1-unit increase in the CV of SBP, DBP, and PP at phase 1 was associated with a 4.708 (95% CI 0.946-8.470), 3.119 (95% CI 0.166-6.073), and 2.205 (95% CI 0.300-4.110) increase, respectively, in the baPWV level at phase 2. Similarly, a 1-unit increase in the SD of DBP and PP at phase 1 was associated with a 4.208 (95% CI 0.177-8.239) and 4.247 (95% CI 0.448-8.046) increase in the baPWV level at phase 2 (Table 3). The positive linear regression lines of the BPV indices at phase 1 and the baPWV level at phase 2 are presented in Figure S2 of Multimedia Appendix 1. In contrast, we did not observe any significant association between the baPWV level at phase 1 and the subsequent BPV indices (Table S1 of Multimedia Appendix 1).

    Table 3. Association between BPVa at phase 1 and the cumulative average level of baPWVb at phase 2c.
    BPV measurementsModel 1dModel 2eModel 3f

    		Coefficient95% CIP valueCoefficient95% CIP valueCoefficient95% CIP value
    SBPg at phase 1
    CVh4.7482.617 to 6.880<.0012.3200.559 to 4.080.014.7080.946 to 8.470.02
    SD3.7142.001 to 5.428<.0011.8000.385 to 3.215.011.666−0.870 to 4.202.20
    DBPi at phase 1
    CV4.5712.662 to 6.480<.001−0.246−1.721 to 1.230.743.1190.166 to 6.073.04
    SD6.0993.499 to 8.699<.001−0.133−2.138 to 1.872.904.2080.177 to 8.239.04
    PPj at phase 1
    CV2.0880.983 to 3.193<.0011.3090.335 to 2.283.0092.2050.300 to 4.110.02
    SD4.4162.234 to 6.599<.0012.7770.852 to 4.703.0054.2470.448 to 8.046.03

    aBPV: blood pressure variability.

    bbaPWV: brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity.

    cPhase 1 refers to the period from visit 1 to visit 3, and phase 2 refers to the period from visit 3 to visit 5.

    dAdjusted for the mean blood pressure level during phase 1.

    eAdjusted for the mean blood pressure level during phase 1, age, and sex.

    fAdjusted for BMI, education level, smoking, drinking, physical activity, hypertension or not, dyslipidemia or not, diabetes or not, triglyceride, total cholesterol (TC), fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), in addition to the covariates in model 2.

    gSBP: systolic blood pressure.

    hCV: coefficient of variation.

    iDBP: diastolic blood pressure.

    jPP: pulse pressure.

    Sensitivity Analysis

    The results remained almost consistent when the blood pressure level at visit 3 was alternatively adjusted in the model, apart from PP (Table S2 of Multimedia Appendix 1). Spearman correlation coefficients among CV, SD, mean, maximum, and minimum SBP, DBP, and PP at the 2 phases are shown in Table S3 in Multimedia Appendix 1. There were strong correlations between the CV and SD of blood pressure indices and weak correlations of BPV indices with the mean, maximum, and minimum blood pressure, which indicated that BPV indices could reflect a novel feature beyond blood pressure itself.

    Subgroup Analysis

    We found that the relationship between BPV indices at phase 1 and baPWV level at phase 2 was affected by hypertension status (Figure 2). The CV and SD of SBP and PP were suggested to be associated with the subsequent baPWV level in participants with hypertension. A 1-unit increase in the CV of SBP and PP at phase 1 was associated with a 4.861 (90% CI 0.642-9.081) and 2.733 (90% CI 0.335-5.131) increase in baPWV level at phase 2, respectively, and a 1-unit increase in the SD of SBP and PP was associated with a 3.283 (90% CI 0.083-6.484) and 4.740 (90% CI 0.299-9.182) increase in baPWV, respectively. Table 4 summarizes the impact of the mean blood pressure, BPV indices, and antihypertensive medication (only in participants with hypertension) on the follow-up baPWV level. The direct blood pressure level was positively associated with the baPWV level in participants with both hypertension and normal blood pressure, and the use of antihypertensive medication was significantly associated with a lowered baPWV level in the subgroup with hypertension.

    ‎
    Figure 2. Associations of blood pressure variability (BPV) indices and the subsequent artery stiffness level in participants with both hypertension and normal blood pressure.The coefficient was adjusted for the mean blood pressure, age, sex, BMI, education level, smoking, drinking, physical activity, hypertension or not, dyslipidemia or not, diabetes or not, triglyceride, total cholesterol, fasting glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), hs-CRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), and antihypertensive medication use (in participants with hypertension). DBP: diastolic blood pressure; PP: pulse pressure; SBP: systolic blood pressure.
    Table 4. Association of BPVa, mean blood pressure, and use of antihypertensive medication with the subsequent baPWVb levels among participants with both hypertension and normal blood pressurec.
    MeasurementsHypertensionNormal blood pressure
    Coefficientd90% CIP valueCoefficientd90% CIP value
    CVe of SBPf4.8610.642 to 9.081.06−0.117−3.471 to 3.237.95
    Mean of SBP4.2732.651 to 5.895<.0014.5543.227 to 5.882<.001
    Antihypertensive medication−54.524−102.105 to −6.944.06N/AgN/AN/A
    SD of SBP3.2830.083 to 6.484.09−0.219−3.083 to 2.645.90
    Mean of SBP4.0292.373 to 5.685<.0014.5693.227 to 5.911<.001
    Antihypertensive medication−54.617−102.292 to −6.942.06N/AN/AN/A
    CV of DBP2.000−1.293 to 5.293.32−2.609−5.224 to 0.013.11
    Mean of DBP4.6532.078 to 7.227.0036.2084.104 to 8.313<.001
    Antihypertensive medication−62.483−111.44 to −13.525.04N/AN/AN/A
    SD of DBPh2.564−1.698 to 6.825.32−3.698−7.452 to 0.056.11
    Mean of DBP4.4111.762 to 7.059.0076.4924.335 to 8.649<.001
    Antihypertensive medication−62.168−111.086 to −13.25.04N/AN/AN/A
    CV of PPi2.7330.335 to 5.131.06−0.353−2.028 to 1.321.73
    Mean of PP4.1161.964 to 6.268.0024.5052.45 to 6.56<.001
    Antihypertensive medication−56.565−105.21 to −7.921.06N/AN/AN/A
    SD of PP4.7400.299 to 9.182.08−1.162−4.774 to 2.449.60
    Mean of PP3.4921.319 to 5.665.0094.6032.569 to 6.638<.001
    Antihypertensive medication−57.520−106.175 to −8.865.049N/AN/AN/A

    aBPV: blood pressure variability.

    bbaPWV: brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity.

    cThe associations between BPV indices and baPWV measurement were examined in separate regression models.

    dModel was adjusted for the mean blood pressure, age, sex, BMI, education level, smoking, drinking, physical activity, hypertension or not, dyslipidemia or not, diabetes or not, triglyceride, total cholesterol (TC), fasting glucose, HbA1c, hs-CRP, and antihypertensive medication use (in participants with hypertension).

    eCV: coefficient of variation.

    fSBP: systolic blood pressure.

    gN/A: not applicable.

    hDBP: diastolic blood pressure.

    iPP: pulse pressure.


    Principal Findings

    This study explored the temporal and bidirectional associations between long-term visit-to-visit BPV and arterial stiffness levels based on a Chinese general population. In the cross-lagged analyses, the BPV indices were shown to have a temporal relationship with subsequent arterial stiffness, indicating that BPV is an independent predictor of unfavorable arterial stiffness levels and precedes arteriosclerosis progression, especially in people with hypertension. The classification of the temporal relationship in this study provides a scientific basis for identifying individuals at a high risk of arterial stiffness, further offering opportunities to advance primary prevention and personalized interventions for arterial stiffness.

    Blood pressure usually stabilizes within a certain range under the complex interaction of environmental factors and normal cardiovascular regulation function. Due to baroreflex dysfunction associated with arteriole remodeling, BPV, and arterial stiffness levels increase with age, but the mutual associations between BPV and arterial stiffness remain unclear [38]. Previous studies have shown that BPV, such as visit-to-visit BPV, day-by-day home BPV, or 24-hour ambulatory BPV, is an independent risk factor for CVD [24,39]. In a post hoc patient-level analysis of 7 clinical trials, Donald et al [40] assessed the association between visit-to-visit BPV and percent atheroma volume and found that in patients with medically treated coronary artery disease, higher BPV, especially systolic BPV, is significantly associated with atherosclerotic progression and adverse cardiovascular outcomes such as death, myocardial infarction, stroke, emergency revascularization for acute coronary syndrome, or hospitalization for unstable angina. In terms of short-term BPV, Sander et al [41] found that diurnal systolic BPV is a significant predictor of atherosclerosis progression in people with hypertension via long-term continuous monitoring of circadian BPV and measurement of atherosclerosis progression using common carotid artery intima-media thickness. In the progression of CVD, arterial stiffness is an important pathological basis and early lesion signal for adverse events [6]. Our study supplements the evidence about the temporal and bidirectional relationships between the visit-to-visit BPV and arterial stiffness level using a cross-lagged cohort design and indicates that BPV could precede arterial stiffness and arteriosclerosis, especially in people with hypertension.

    The pathological mechanism between BPV and arterial stiffness or CVD has not been completely determined [17,28]. According to the previous literature, endothelial dysfunction caused by vascular remodeling plays an important role in BPV-induced arterial stiffness, subsequently leading to the development of CVD [28,42-44]. Keith et al [45] found that BPV is positively correlated with endothelial dysfunction, as reflected in a significant association between higher BPV with lower endothelium-dependent flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) and lower FMD/non–endothelium-dependent nitroglycerin-mediated vasodilation (NMD) ratio, which suggests that endothelium-specific vasodilation is impaired in individuals with higher BPV. Moreover, a significant association between endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness has been observed in clinical studies. For example, Carmel et al [44] demonstrated that brachial artery FMD is negatively correlated with aortic pulse wave velocity (PWV) in healthy individuals, which implies that endothelial dysfunction mediates the effect of BPV on arterial stiffness.

    Furthermore, the hemodynamic environment changes caused by BPV may be an important reason for vascular endothelial dysfunction, which is closely related to the progression of arterial stiffness and atherosclerotic diseases [42,46]. The shear stress (SS) generated by blood flow and vascular endothelium triggers the release of various vasoactive mediators from endothelial cells, among which nitric oxide (NO), produced by endothelial-type nitric oxide synthase (eNOS or NOS3), is considered the main endothelial diastolic factor [47]. Under physiological conditions, a dynamic balance is maintained between blood flow stimulation and endothelial cell responses to maintain a stable internal environment [47]. Stable blood flow results in higher endothelial SS, lower intimal hyperplasia, and reduced atherosclerosis risk [25,48]. In contrast, complicated blood flow patterns produce low endothelial SS in the vascular wall, which facilitates the transshipment and accumulation of atherosclerotic risk factors, such as low-density lipoprotein to the intima of the vascular wall, and facilitates the inflammatory response of the vascular wall [48,49]. In addition, oscillatory SS induced by complex flow patterns can induce the expression of leukocyte adhesion molecules in endothelial cells, recruit inflammatory cells (monocytes and T cells) to the arterial wall, and initiate local vascular inflammation [49,50]. Oscillatory SS could also promote the activation of the oxidation process by increasing nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-reduced (NADH) oxidase activity [51]. In the physiological state, the continuous release of NO from endothelial cells contributes to the functional regulation of arterial elasticity, and the combined effect of oscillatory SS and pressure could downregulate the expression level of endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase (EcNOS) and reduce the synthesis of NO [52]. Increased BPV might adversely affect the stability of hemodynamics in a physiological setting, thereby affecting vascular endothelial function.

    In addition, previous population-based studies have shown that high BPV is strongly associated with biomarkers of vascular inflammation, independent of the mean levels of blood pressure [53]. In short, BPV could be both a cause and an indicator of arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis through hemodynamic environment changes and vascular endothelial dysfunction. In another prospective cohort, researchers found that baseline common carotid arterial intima-media thickness was not significantly associated with BPV during follow-up [41], which suggests that BPV is the initial cause of arteriosclerosis and arterial stiffness from another aspect [42] and could be the underlying pathological mechanism and therapeutic target of arterial stiffness and related atherosclerotic vascular diseases. Interventions in diet, lifestyle habits, and pharmacological treatment in high-risk groups can effectively reduce arterial stiffness levels [54,55]. The temporal association between increased BPV and arterial stiffness identified in this study further emphasizes the role of BPV levels as an early warning for the risk of arterial stiffness. Our findings are potentially valuable for delaying or avoiding the progression of arterial stiffness at a population level and promoting early and active cardiovascular health in the public health setting.

    Based on the vicious cycle of hemodynamic stress and vascular disease, Kario et al [24] proposed the concept of systemic hemodynamic atherothrombotic syndrome (SHATS). Patients were assessed with scales that synergistically consider hemodynamic stress (various forms of blood pressure and BPV) and vascular disease to identify SHATS early and provide effective intervention to reduce adverse cardiovascular events and target organ damage [24]. In this study, we further demonstrated the potential role of maintaining blood pressure stability and reducing BPV to control arterial stiffness status. On the one hand, we found that the use of antihypertensive medication is associated with decreased arterial stiffness levels. Combination therapy with long-acting calcium channel blockers and angiotensin II receptor blockers has demonstrated to be effective in reducing both long-term BPV and arterial stiffness [56]. On the other hand, the association between BPV and arterial stiffness is still significant after adjusting for the use of antihypertensive medication. Previous studies on antihypertensive medication adherence also found that low adherence resulted in only a small increase in BPV compared with high adherence, and BPV was significantly associated with CVD independent of medication adherence [57,58], which underlines the comprehensive and novel strategy for controlling BPV levels. Strict BP control by taking medication, together with leading a healthy lifestyle, may play a pivotal role in suppressing arterial stiffening via BPV reduction in people with hypertension [59].

    In addition, this study found that BPV preceded arterial stiffness, suggesting a high risk of CVD in people with higher BPV. Previous studies have shown that plant-based diets have protective effects against CVD. In particular, the Mediterranean diet significantly reduces arterial stiffness and blood pressure levels [9], and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) combined with exercise can significantly reduce blood pressure in people with intractable hypertension [13,14]. Additionally, moderate nut intake can also help control CVD risk factors such as weight by reducing appetite and fat absorption [11]. Enhanced monitoring of BPV and individualized interventions in diet, lifestyle habits, and pharmacotherapy for those at a high risk of increased BPV are significant in reducing the risk of arterial stiffness and the occurrence of subsequent cardiovascular events [60-62]. Based on these study findings, the integration of long-term monitoring of blood pressure levels into community-level health examinations is essential to optimize the prevention efficacy of CVD. Long-term BPV complements the performance of early CVD risk assessment at the population level compared to a single-point level of blood pressure, providing an opportunity to shift the focus from treatment to population-level risk prevention, which emphasizes the potential effectiveness of community-level continuous monitoring of blood pressure levels and early identification of increased BPV. Among people with hypertension, enhancing medication adherence and adhering to healthy dietary habits to maintain stable blood pressure over a long period are important for preventing subsequent adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

    Limitations

    Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, different antihypertensive drugs have distinct effects on BPV and arterial stiffness levels, but detailed information on medication use is lacking in our study. The interaction effect between different antihypertensive medications and BPV on arterial stiffness levels needs further investigation. Second, this study is based on a Chinese cohort, and the observed results warrant further validation in other populations with large sample sizes. Data on household socioeconomic status and food intake were not collected in the cohort. The estimated effect size could be biased given the potential effects of socioeconomic status and dietary patterns on the arterial stiffness level. Third, the specific effect of maintaining long-term stable blood pressure on suppressing arterial stiffening and promoting cardiovascular health warrants further research.

    Conclusions

    Our findings suggested a temporal relationship between visit-to-visit BPV and arterial stiffness during 10-year surveys, especially in people with hypertension. Maintaining long-term stable blood pressure should be emphasized for suppressing arterial stiffness. This study further demonstrates that long-term BPV provides a new target for the early prevention of CVD in the public health setting, suggesting the potential benefit of incorporating long-term monitoring and assessment of BPV into community-level health examinations.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank all the staff and participants of the Beijing Health Management Cohort for their invaluable contributions. This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872708 and 82073668) to author LT.

    Data Availability

    Data collected for this study are available on request with publication; requests should be directed to the corresponding author.

    Authors' Contributions

    Authors XG (statguo@ccmu.edu.cn) and LT (taolixin.2008@163.com) are co-corresponding authors for this article.

    Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

    Multimedia Appendix 1

    Supplemental tables and figures.

    DOC File , 270 KB
    1. Olsen MH, Angell SY, Asma S, Boutouyrie P, Burger D, Chirinos JA, et al. A call to action and a lifecourse strategy to address the global burden of raised blood pressure on current and future generations: the Lancet Commission on hypertension. Lancet. Dec 26, 2016;388(10060):2665-2712. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    2. Fuchs FD, Whelton PK. High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. Hypertension. Feb 2020;75(2):285-292. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    3. Wang Z, Chen Z, Zhang L, Wang X, Hao G, Zhang Z, et al. China Hypertension Survey Investigators. Status of hypertension in China: results from the China Hypertension Survey, 2012-2015. Circulation. May 29, 2018;137(22):2344-2356. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    4. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet. Sep 11, 2021;398(10304):957-980. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    5. Zhou B, Perel P, Mensah GA, Ezzati M. Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol. Nov 28, 2021;18(11):785-802. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    6. Chirinos JA, Segers P, Hughes T, Townsend R. Large-artery stiffness in health and disease: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 03, 2019;74(9):1237-1263. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    7. Chirinos JA, Segers P. Noninvasive evaluation of left ventricular afterload: part 2: arterial pressure-flow and pressure-volume relations in humans. Hypertension. Oct 2010;56(4):563-570. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    8. Kaess BM, Rong J, Larson MG, Hamburg NM, Vita JA, Levy D, et al. Aortic stiffness, blood pressure progression, and incident hypertension. JAMA. Sep 05, 2012;308(9):875-881. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    9. Jennings A, Berendsen AM, de Groot LCPGM, Feskens EJM, Brzozowska A, Sicinska E, et al. Mediterranean-style diet improves systolic blood pressure and arterial stiffness in older adults. Hypertension. Mar 2019;73(3):578-586. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    10. Noce A, Romani A, Bernini R. Dietary intake and chronic disease prevention. Nutrients. Apr 19, 2021;13(4) [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    11. Pahlavani N, Rostami D, Ebrahimi F, Azizi-Soleiman F. Nuts effects in chronic disease and relationship between walnuts and satiety: review on the available evidence. Obesity Medicine. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obmed.2019.100173 [accessed 2023-06-13]
    12. Kolahdouz-Mohammadi R, Malekahmadi M, Clayton ZS, Sadat SZ, Pahlavani N, Sikaroudi MK, et al. Effect of egg consumption on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Curr Hypertens Rep. Feb 29, 2020;22(3):24. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    13. Pahlavani N, Khayyatzadeh SS, Banazadeh V, Bagherniya M, Tayefi M, Eslami S, et al. Adherence to a Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension (DASH)-style in relation to daytime sleepiness. Nat Sci Sleep. 2020;12:325-332. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    14. Blumenthal JA, Hinderliter AL, Smith PJ, Mabe S, Watkins LL, Craighead L, et al. Effects of lifestyle modification on patients with resistant hypertension: results of the TRIUMPH randomized clinical trial. Circulation. Oct 12, 2021;144(15):1212-1226. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    15. Chen W, Li S, Fernandez C, Sun D, Lai C, Zhang T, et al. Temporal relationship between elevated blood pressure and arterial stiffening among middle-aged Black and White adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol. Apr 01, 2016;183(7):599-608. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    16. Yano Y, Reis JP, Lewis CE, Sidney S, Pletcher MJ, Bibbins-Domingo K, et al. Association of blood pressure patterns in young adulthood with cardiovascular disease and mortality in middle age. JAMA Cardiol. Apr 01, 2020;5(4):382-389. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    17. Gosmanova EO, Mikkelsen MK, Molnar MZ, Lu JL, Yessayan LT, Kalantar-Zadeh K, et al. Association of systolic blood pressure variability with mortality, coronary heart disease, stroke, and renal disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. Sep 27, 2016;68(13):1375-1386. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    18. Alaarag A, Amin O. Blood pressure variability in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease. J Hum Hypertens. Dec 2021;35(12):1074-1080. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    19. Chang TI, Tabada GH, Yang J, Tan TC, Go AS. Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure and death, end-stage renal disease, and cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease. J Hypertens. Feb 2016;34(2):244-252. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    20. Diaz KM, Tanner RM, Falzon L, Levitan EB, Reynolds K, Shimbo D, et al. Visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure and cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hypertension. Nov 2014;64(5):965-982. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    21. Kario K. Prognosis in relation to blood pressure variability: pro side of the argument. Hypertension. Jun 2015;65(6):1163-9; discussion 1169. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    22. Wei F, Li Y, Zhang L, Xu T, Ding F, Wang J, et al. Beat-to-beat, reading-to-reading, and day-to-day blood pressure variability in relation to organ damage in untreated Chinese. Hypertension. Apr 2014;63(4):790-796. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    23. Hallock P, Benson IC. Studies on the Elastic Properties of Human Isolated Aorta. J Clin Invest. Jul 1937;16(4):595-602. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    24. Ishiyama Y, Hoshide S, Kanegae H, Kario K. Increased arterial stiffness amplifies the association between home blood pressure variability and cardiac overload: the J-HOP study. Hypertension. Jun 2020;75(6):1600-1606. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    25. Bencivenga L, De Souto Barreto P, Rolland Y, Hanon O, Vidal J, Cestac P, et al. Blood pressure variability: A potential marker of aging. Ageing Res Rev. Sep 2022;80:101677. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    26. Li C, Liu R, Wang J, Yang J. Relationship between blood pressure variability and target organ damage in elderly patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. Dec 2017;21(23):5451-5455. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    27. Schillaci G, Bilo G, Pucci G, Laurent S, Macquin-Mavier I, Boutouyrie P, et al. Relationship between short-term blood pressure variability and large-artery stiffness in human hypertension: findings from 2 large databases. Hypertension. Aug 2012;60(2):369-377. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    28. Miyauchi S, Nagai M, Dote K, Kato M, Oda N, Kunita E, et al. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and arterial stiffness: which came first: the chicken or the egg? Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(6):685-692. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    29. Wu Z, Zhang H, Miao X, Li H, Pan H, Zhou D, et al. High-intensity physical activity is not associated with better cognition in the elder: evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Alzheimers Res Ther. Nov 03, 2021;13(1):182. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    30. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, et al. The seventh report of the joint national committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. May 21, 2003;289(19):2560-2572. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    31. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2020 abridged for primary care providers. Clin Diabetes. Jan 2020;38(1):10-38. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    32. Joint Committee for Developing Chinese Guidelines on Prevention and Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Adults. Chinese guidelines on prevention and treatment of dyslipidemia in adults. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. May 2007;35(5):390-419. [Medline]
    33. Yamashina A, Tomiyama H, Takeda K, Tsuda H, Arai T, Hirose K, et al. Validity, reproducibility, and clinical significance of noninvasive brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity measurement. Hypertens Res. May 2002;25(3):359-364. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    34. Han T, Meng X, Shan R, Zi T, Li Y, Ma H, et al. Temporal relationship between hyperuricemia and obesity, and its association with future risk of type 2 diabetes. Int J Obes (Lond). Jul 2018;42(7):1336-1344. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    35. Wu S, Jin C, Li S, Zheng X, Zhang X, Cui L, et al. Aging, arterial stiffness, and blood pressure association in Chinese adults. Hypertension. Apr 2019;73(4):893-899. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    36. Riley RD, Ensor J, Snell KIE, Harrell FE, Martin GP, Reitsma JB, et al. Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model. BMJ. Mar 18, 2020;368:m441. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    37. Fan X, Liu Z, Miyata T, Dasarathy S, Rotroff DM, Wu X, et al. Effect of acid suppressants on the risk of COVID-19: a propensity score-matched study using UK Biobank. Gastroenterology. Jan 2021;160(1):455-458.e5. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    38. Donato AJ, Machin DR, Lesniewski LA. Mechanisms of dysfunction in the aging vasculature and role in age-related disease. Circ Res. Sep 14, 2018;123(7):825-848. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    39. Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, O'Brien E, Dobson JE, Dahlöf B, et al. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet. Mar 13, 2010;375(9718):895-905. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    40. Clark D, Nicholls SJ, St John J, Elshazly MB, Ahmed HM, Khraishah H, et al. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability, coronary atheroma progression, and clinical outcomes. JAMA Cardiol. May 01, 2019;4(5):437-443. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    41. Sander D, Kukla C, Klingelhöfer J, Winbeck K, Conrad B. Relationship between circadian blood pressure patterns and progression of early carotid atherosclerosis: A 3-year follow-up study. Circulation. Sep 26, 2000;102(13):1536-1541. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    42. Palombo C, Kozakova M. Arterial stiffness, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk: Pathophysiologic mechanisms and emerging clinical indications. Vascul Pharmacol. Feb 2016;77:1-7. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    43. Shimbo D, Shea S, McClelland RL, Viera AJ, Mann D, Newman J, et al. Associations of aortic distensibility and arterial elasticity with long-term visit-to-visit blood pressure variability: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Am J Hypertens. Jul 2013;26(7):896-902. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    44. McEniery CM, Wallace S, Mackenzie IS, McDonnell B, Yasmin; Newby DE, et al. Endothelial function is associated with pulse pressure, pulse wave velocity, and augmentation index in healthy humans. Hypertension. Oct 2006;48(4):602-608. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    45. Diaz KM, Veerabhadrappa P, Kashem MA, Feairheller DL, Sturgeon KM, Williamson ST, et al. Relationship of visit-to-visit and ambulatory blood pressure variability to vascular function in African Americans. Hypertens Res. Jan 2012;35(1):55-61. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    46. Hisamatsu T, Miura K, Ohkubo T, Arima H, Fujiyoshi A, Satoh A, et al. SESSA Research Group. Home blood pressure variability and subclinical atherosclerosis in multiple vascular beds: a population-based study. J Hypertens. Nov 2018;36(11):2193-2203. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    47. Wang S, Chennupati R, Kaur H, Iring A, Wettschureck N, Offermanns S. Endothelial cation channel PIEZO1 controls blood pressure by mediating flow-induced ATP release. J Clin Invest. Dec 01, 2016;126(12):4527-4536. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    48. Chatzizisis YS, Coskun AU, Jonas M, Edelman ER, Feldman CL, Stone PH. Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jun 26, 2007;49(25):2379-2393. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    49. Chappell DC, Varner SE, Nerem RM, Medford RM, Alexander RW. Oscillatory shear stress stimulates adhesion molecule expression in cultured human endothelium. Circ Res. Mar 23, 1998;82(5):532-539. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    50. Shintani Y, Kikuya M, Hara A, Ohkubo T, Metoki H, Asayama K, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure, blood pressure variability and the prevalence of carotid artery alteration: the Ohasama study. J Hypertens. Aug 2007;25(8):1704-1710. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    51. De Keulenaer GW, Chappell DC, Ishizaka N, Nerem RM, Alexander RW, Griendling KK. Oscillatory and steady laminar shear stress differentially affect human endothelial redox state: role of a superoxide-producing NADH oxidase. Circ Res. Jun 01, 1998;82(10):1094-1101. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    52. Ziegler T, Bouzourène K, Harrison VJ, Brunner HR, Hayoz D. Influence of oscillatory and unidirectional flow environments on the expression of endothelin and nitric oxide synthase in cultured endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. May 1998;18(5):686-692. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    53. Tatasciore A, Zimarino M, Renda G, Zurro M, Soccio M, Prontera C, et al. Awake blood pressure variability, inflammatory markers and target organ damage in newly diagnosed hypertension. Hypertens Res. Dec 2008;31(12):2137-2146. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    54. Boutouyrie P, Chowienczyk P, Humphrey JD, Mitchell GF. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular risk in hypertension. Circ Res. Apr 02, 2021;128(7):864-886. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    55. Petersen KS, Blanch N, Keogh JB, Clifton PM. Effect of Weight Loss on Pulse Wave Velocity. ATVB. Jan 2015;35(1):243-252. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    56. Zhang Y, Agnoletti D, Safar ME, Blacher J. Effect of antihypertensive agents on blood pressure variability: the Natrilix SR versus candesartan and amlodipine in the reduction of systolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients (X-CELLENT) study. Hypertension. Aug 2011;58(2):155-160. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    57. Muntner P, Levitan EB, Joyce C, Holt E, Mann D, Oparil S, et al. Association between antihypertensive medication adherence and visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). Feb 2013;15(2):112-117. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    58. Kronish IM, Lynch AI, Oparil S, Whittle J, Davis BR, Simpson LM, et al. The association between antihypertensive medication nonadherence and visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure: findings From the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. Hypertension. Jul 2016;68(1):39-45. [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
    59. Parati G, Ochoa JE, Lombardi C, Bilo G. Assessment and management of blood-pressure variability. Nat Rev Cardiol. Mar 2013;10(3):143-155. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    60. D'Elia L, Galletti F, La Fata E, Sabino P, Strazzullo P. Effect of dietary sodium restriction on arterial stiffness: systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. J Hypertens. Apr 2018;36(4):734-743. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    61. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Vascular Mechanism Collaboration. Dose-dependent arterial destiffening and inward remodeling after olmesartan in hypertensives with metabolic syndrome. Hypertension. Oct 2014;64(4):709-716. [CrossRef] [Medline]
    62. Lopes S, Afreixo V, Teixeira M, Garcia C, Leitão C, Gouveia M, et al. Exercise training reduces arterial stiffness in adults with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. Feb 01, 2021;39(2):214-222. [CrossRef] [Medline]

    ‎
    ∆Tba: time interval between the brachium and ankle
    baPWV: brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity
    BPV: blood pressure variability
    CV: coefficient of variation
    CVD: cardiovascular disease
    DASH: Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension
    DBP: diastolic pressure
    EcNOS: endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase
    eNOS: endothelial-type nitric oxide synthase
    FBG: fasting blood glucose
    FMD: flow-mediated vasodilation
    HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin
    HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
    hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
    JNC-7: Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
    LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
    NADH: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-reduced
    NMD: non–endothelium-dependent nitroglycerin-mediated vasodilation
    NO: nitric oxide
    PWV: pulse wave velocity
    SBP: systolic blood pressure
    SHATS: systemic hemodynamic atherothrombotic syndrome
    SS: shear stress
    TC: total cholesterol

    Edited by A Mavragani, T Sanchez; submitted 24.12.22; peer-reviewed by A Higaki, N Pahlavani; comments to author 12.04.23; revised version received 20.04.23; accepted 24.05.23; published 04.07.23.

    Copyright

    ©Zhiyuan Wu, Haiping Zhang, Yutao Wang, Zhiwei Li, Xia Li, Lixin Tao, Xiuhua Guo. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (https://publichealth.jmir.org), 04.07.2023.

    This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.