e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 6 of 6 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 2 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 1 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 1 JMIR Formative Research
- 1 JMIR Medical Education
- 1 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Geographical Disparities in Research Misconduct: Analyzing Retraction Patterns by Country
Retractions are essential for maintaining scientific integrity, especially in cases of research misconduct [1-4]. Data from 2013 to 2015 show that retraction rates vary by country due to differences in research culture, regulations, and publication pressures [3]. Understanding these variations is vital to identifying systemic issues in research integrity.
J Med Internet Res 2025;27:e65775
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Whether the result of unintentional, albeit careless, completion of multiple surveys or the purposeful misrepresentation of oneself [1], misinformation associated with web-based survey fraud compromises data quality and integrity with important implications for scientific conclusions, clinical practice, and social benefit [2,7].
JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024;10:e51786
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
These vulnerabilities include inference attacks, where malicious entities may attempt to reconstruct personal data from model updates, as well as direct cyber threats that target the integrity and confidentiality of the FL process [68]. The body of literature on FL privacy highlights the critical importance of acknowledging these risks, with studies identifying various attack vectors that could potentially compromise the privacy guarantees of federated model sharing [72].
JMIR Form Res 2024;8:e55496
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The Ability of ChatGPT in Paraphrasing Texts and Reducing Plagiarism: A Descriptive Analysis
These measures not only act as deterrents but also aid in upholding the standards of academic integrity and ensuring originality in scholarly publications.
In recent times, artificial intelligence (AI) has gained significant popularity across a wide range of individuals, including researchers and professionals. Among the various applications of AI, chatbots have emerged as a notable development, using AI and natural language processing techniques to generate humanlike responses to user queries [8].
JMIR Med Educ 2024;10:e53308
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Retractions for misconduct can be seen as proxies for scientific integrity, and our results suggest that it varies with gender. Identifying the underlying reasons for these gender disparities is challenging. No studies had directly tackled this topic, making it difficult to draw conclusive findings. Biological, social, and cultural factors can interact in a complex way and contribute to the more pronounced competitive tendencies of men versus women, which can be a possible risk factor for misconduct [9].
J Med Internet Res 2023;25:e48529
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The ability to identify a biospecimen’s source remains central for the integrity and value of related research. Likewise, current deidentification techniques are a similarly thin veneer of privacy protection [4,5]. Biospecimens are inherently unique; truly deidentifying them may not be possible given the richness of underlying data, advances in genomics, and maturation of artificial intelligence technology [4,5,12].
JMIR Bioinform Biotech 2021;2(1):e29905
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS