e.g. mhealth
Search Results (1 to 1 of 1 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 1 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
WHt R showed the highest AUC for males (0.91, 95% CI 0.90‐0.92). LAP showed the highest AUC for females (0.89, 95% CI 0.89‐0.90). The optimal cutoff value and its corresponding sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index can be found in Table S1 in Multimedia Appendix 1. After stratifying by age, WHt R and LAP also had the highest AUC values among all age groups (Table S2 in Multimedia Appendix 1). The AUC values of all 8 anthropometric indexes declined with age.
JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024;10:e57799
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS