Search Results (1 to 10 of 2723 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 829 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 483 JMIR Research Protocols
- 298 JMIR Formative Research
- 214 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 132 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 103 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 79 JMIR Mental Health
- 76 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 74 JMIR Human Factors
- 56 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 45 JMIR Cancer
- 44 JMIR Aging
- 37 JMIR Serious Games
- 32 JMIR Medical Education
- 29 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 27 JMIR Dermatology
- 26 Iproceedings
- 24 JMIR Diabetes
- 21 JMIR Cardio
- 17 JMIR Infodemiology
- 16 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 13 JMIRx Med
- 12 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 9 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 8 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 7 JMIR AI
- 4 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 3 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
- 2 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 2 JMIR Nursing
- 1 Medicine 2.0
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
Monte Carlo simulations computed in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) were used to estimate the required sample size for our proposed models. Our analyses, based on simulated data, suggest that a total sample size of 300 provides enough statistical power (up to 90%) to detect anticipated effect sizes on primary outcomes of cognitive capacity and cognitive bias based on values from our group and those reported in the literature (CR: d=0.50 and MCT: g=0.27) [9,20,27,31].
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e63269
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The PMIS (Pearson r=−0.76; P
As we examined the sensitivity and specificity data to choose cut scores, we chose to favor sensitivity to minimize missing individuals with true disease in this sample of patients considered high risk because of their cognitive concerns. The cut scores for a positive result on the 5-Cog components were as follows: PMIS ≤6 (range 0-8), Symbol Match ≤25 (range 0-65), and s MCR >5 (range 0-7).
JMIR Res Protoc 2025;14:e60471
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS (SAS Institute) [46] and R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) [47], and significance was determined at a P value of .05.
Following transcription, 3 members of the research team (SS, SM, and TC) conducted a double-coding process on the transcripts from 52% (12/23) intervention group participants and 48% (11/23) control group participants.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e67997
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section