TY - JOUR AU - Miranda, Joyal AU - Côté, José PY - 2017 DA - 2017/04/19 TI - The Use of Intervention Mapping to Develop a Tailored Web-Based Intervention, Condom-HIM JO - JMIR Public Health Surveill SP - e20 VL - 3 IS - 2 KW - Internet KW - condoms KW - HIV seropositivity KW - intention KW - self-efficacy KW - sexual behavior AB - Background: Many HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) prevention interventions are currently being implemented and evaluated, with little information published on their development. A framework highlighting the method of development of an intervention can be used by others wanting to replicate interventions or develop similar interventions to suit other contexts and settings. It provides researchers with a comprehensive development process of the intervention. Objective: The objective of this paper was to describe how a systematic approach, intervention mapping, was used to develop a tailored Web-based intervention to increase condom use among HIV-positive men who have sex with men. Methods: The intervention was developed in consultation with a multidisciplinary team composed of academic researchers, community members, Web designers, and the target population. Intervention mapping involved a systematic process of 6 steps: (1) needs assessment; (2) identification of proximal intervention objectives; (3) selection of theory-based intervention methods and practical strategies; (4) development of intervention components and materials; (5) adoption, implementation, and maintenance; and (6) evaluation planning. Results: The application of intervention mapping resulted in the development of a tailored Web-based intervention for HIV-positive men who have sex with men, called Condom-HIM. Conclusions: Using intervention mapping as a systematic process to develop interventions is a feasible approach that specifically integrates the use of theory and empirical findings. Outlining the process used to develop a particular intervention provides clarification on the conceptual use of experimental interventions in addition to potentially identifying reasons for intervention failures. SN - 2369-2960 UR - http://publichealth.jmir.org/2017/2/e20/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.7052 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28428162 DO - 10.2196/publichealth.7052 ID - info:doi/10.2196/publichealth.7052 ER -