TY - JOUR AU - Lundberg, Alex Lars AU - Fox, James Alan AU - Mohammad, Hassan AU - Mason, Maryann AU - Salina, Doreen AU - Victorson, David AU - Parra-Cardona, Ruben AU - Post, Lori Ann PY - 2024 DA - 2024/9/20 TI - Public Mass Shootings: Counterfactual Trend Analysis of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban JO - JMIR Public Health Surveill SP - e62952 VL - 10 KW - assault weapons KW - FAWB KW - federal assault weapons ban KW - firearms KW - guns KW - large-capacity magazine KW - LCM KW - gun policy KW - public mass shootings KW - weapon KW - weapons KW - shooting KW - shootings KW - prevention KW - efficacy KW - surveillance KW - public health KW - linear regression KW - homicide KW - gun KW - gun control KW - gun injury KW - gun injuries KW - health policy KW - information seeking behavior KW - health informatics AB - Background: Assault weapon and large-capacity magazine bans are potential tools for policy makers to prevent public mass shootings. However, the efficacy of these bans is a continual source of debate. In an earlier study, we estimated the impact of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban (FAWB) on the number of public mass shooting events in the United States. This study provides an updated assessment with 3 additional years of firearm surveillance data to characterize the longer-term effects. Objective: This study aims to estimate the impact of the FAWB on trends in public mass shootings from 1966 to 2022. Methods: We used linear regression to estimate the impact of the FAWB on the 4-year simple moving average of annual public mass shootings, defined by events with 4 or more deaths in 24 hours, not including the perpetrator. The study period spans 1966 to 2022. The model includes indicator variables for both the FAWB period (1995‐2004) and the period after its removal (2005‐2022). These indicators were interacted with a linear time trend. Estimates were controlled for the national homicide rate. After estimation, the model provided counterfactual estimates of public mass shootings if the FAWB was never imposed and if the FAWB remained in place. Results: The overall upward trajectory in the number of public mass shootings substantially fell while the FAWB was in place. These trends are specific to events in which the perpetrator used an assault weapon or large-capacity magazine. Point estimates suggest the FAWB prevented up to 5 public mass shootings while the ban was active. A continuation of the FAWB and large-capacity magazine ban would have prevented up to 38 public mass shootings, but the CIs become wider as time moves further away from the period of the FAWB. Conclusions: The FAWB, which included a ban on large-capacity magazines, was associated with fewer public mass shooting events, fatalities, and nonfatal gun injuries. Gun control legislation is an important public health tool in the prevention of public mass shootings. SN - 2369-2960 UR - https://publichealth.jmir.org/2024/1/e62952 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/62952 DO - 10.2196/62952 ID - info:doi/10.2196/62952 ER -