<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.0 20040830//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="2.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">JMIR Public Health Surveill</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">publichealth</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="index">9</journal-id><journal-title>JMIR Public Health and Surveillance</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>JMIR Public Health Surveill</abbrev-journal-title><issn pub-type="epub">2369-2960</issn><publisher><publisher-name>JMIR Publications</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Toronto, Canada</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">v10i1e53879</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2196/53879</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Paper</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Association Between Particulate Matter Exposure and Preterm Birth in Women With Abnormal Preconception Thyrotropin Levels: Large Cohort Study</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Ting</given-names></name><degrees>MS</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ni</surname><given-names>Haobo</given-names></name><degrees>MS</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Xiaoyan</given-names></name><degrees>MS</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dai</surname><given-names>Tingting</given-names></name><degrees>MS</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Lingxi</given-names></name><degrees>MS</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>Lina</given-names></name><degrees>MS</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>Qinghui</given-names></name><degrees>MS</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Xiaolin</given-names></name><degrees>MS</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Lu</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" equal-contrib="yes"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Pi</given-names></name><degrees>PhD</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="equal-contrib1">*</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical Colleage</institution>, <addr-line>Shantou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><institution>NHC Key Laboratory of Male Reproduction and Genetics, Guangdong Provincial Reproductive Science Institute, Guangdong Provincial Fertility Hospital</institution>, <addr-line>Guangzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="editor"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mavragani</surname><given-names>Amaryllis</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="reviewer"><name name-style="western"><surname>Khezri</surname><given-names>Rozhan</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="reviewer"><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Zhihao</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp>Correspondence to Pi Guo, PhD, Department of Preventive Medicine, Shantou University Medical Colleage, No 22 Xinling Road, Shantou, 515041, China, 86 754-88900445; <email>pguo@stu.edu.cn</email></corresp><fn fn-type="equal" id="equal-contrib1"><label>*</label><p>these authors contributed equally</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>2</day><month>8</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><elocation-id>e53879</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>10</month><year>2023</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>04</month><year>2024</year></date></history><copyright-statement>&#x00A9; Ting Xu, Haobo Ni, Xiaoyan Cai, Tingting Dai, Lingxi Wang, Lina Xiao, Qinghui Zeng, Xiaolin Yu, Lu Han, Pi Guo. Originally published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://publichealth.jmir.org">https://publichealth.jmir.org</ext-link>), 2.8.2024. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://publichealth.jmir.org">https://publichealth.jmir.org</ext-link>, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.</p></license><self-uri xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://publichealth.jmir.org/2024/1/e53879"/><abstract><sec><title>Background</title><p>Prior research has linked exposure to particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of &#x2264;2.5 &#x03BC;m (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) with preterm birth (PTB). However, the modulating effect of preconception thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) levels on the relationship between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and PTB has not been investigated.</p></sec><sec><title>Objective</title><p>This study aimed to assess whether preconception TSH levels modulate the impact of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure on PTB.</p></sec><sec sec-type="methods"><title>Methods</title><p>This cohort study was conducted in Guangdong, China, as a part of the National Free Pre-Pregnancy Checkups Project. PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure was estimated by using the inverse distance weighting method. To investigate the moderating effects of TSH levels on trimester-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and PTB, we used the Cox proportional hazards model. Additionally, to identify the susceptible exposure windows for weekly specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and PTB, we built distributed lag models incorporating Cox proportional hazards models.</p></sec><sec sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><p>A total of 633,516 women who delivered between January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019, were included. In total, 34,081 (5.4%) of them had abnormal preconception TSH levels. During the entire pregnancy, each 10-&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup> increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> was linked to elevated risks of PTB (hazard ratio [HR] 1.559, 95% CI 1.390&#x2010;1.748), early PTB (HR 1.559, 95% CI 1.227&#x2010;1.980), and late PTB (HR 1.571, 95% CI 1.379&#x2010;1.791) among women with abnormal TSH levels. For women with normal preconception TSH levels, PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure during the entire pregnancy was positively associated with the risk of PTB (HR 1.345, 95% CI 1.307&#x2010;1.385), early PTB (HR 1.203, 95% CI 1.126&#x2010;1.285), and late PTB (HR 1.386, 95% CI 1.342&#x2010;1432). The critical susceptible exposure windows were the 3rd-13th and 28th-35th gestational weeks for women with abnormal preconception TSH levels, compared to the 1st-13th and 21st-35th gestational weeks for those with normal preconception TSH levels.</p></sec><sec sec-type="conclusions"><title>Conclusions</title><p>PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure was linked with a higher PTB risk, particularly in women with abnormal preconception TSH levels. PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure appears to have a greater effect on pregnant women who are in the early or late stages of pregnancy.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>PM2.5</kwd><kwd>particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of &#x2264;2.5 &#x03BC;m</kwd><kwd>thyroid stimulating hormone</kwd><kwd>preterm birth</kwd><kwd>cohort study</kwd><kwd>preconception</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>With the decline of fertility, maternal and newborn health is receiving more attention. Preterm birth (PTB; birth at less than 37 complete gestational weeks), as a common adverse birth outcome, not only correlates with infant morbidity and mortality but also is a primary cause of death of children aged younger than 5 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>]. According to the World Health Organization, there were approximately 13.4 million cases of PTB worldwide in 2020 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>]. PTB has been reported to have adverse effects on subsequent physical and cognitive development, placing a heavy burden on families, health systems, and socioeconomics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>]. Identifying the risk factors for PTB is an urgent issue, as it can help to prevent PTB.</p><p>Epidemiological studies have indicated that air pollution during pregnancy, especially involving particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of &#x2264;2.5 &#x03BC;m (PM<sub>2.5</sub>), is a risk factor for PTB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>]. The levels of susceptibility of pregnant women to air pollution may vary depending on their physiological status [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>]. For example, previous studies have shown that women with preexisting health problems such as diabetes and chronic hypertension are more sensitive to the detrimental consequence of air pollution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>]. In particular, maternal thyroid function could modulate the relationship of air pollution with birth outcomes. Pregnant women often experience thyroid dysfunction, which can increase the risks of PTB, spontaneous abortion, and other adverse birth outcomes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>]. Previous studies have found that prepregnancy thyroid disease might result in adverse birth outcomes, such as congenital heart defects, by modulating the effect of air pollution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>].</p><p>Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) is a crucial indicator of thyroid function. According to a nationwide cross-sectional study in China, the prevalence of abnormal thyroid stimulating levels has been estimated to be about 15.33% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>]. However, although the prevalence of abnormal TSH levels remains high and exerts great influence on individuals and society, studies on women who have abnormal TSH levels are limited. A study by Arbib et al [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>] has revealed that abnormal TSH levels during early pregnancy are a risk factor for PTB and placental abruption. The impact of preconception TSH levels on pregnant women needs to be explored to encourage those women to adopt appropriate health care measures during pregnancy. Unfortunately, the pregnancy outcomes of women with abnormal prepregnancy TSH levels do not receive the attention they deserve. Only several studies have shown that women with lower or higher preconception TSH levels had increased risks of PTB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>]. Identifying the modulating effects of TSH on the relationship between air pollution and PTB is of great significance, as it can help to identify susceptible people and contribute to providing recommendations for mitigating the risks of PTB. Although the mechanism of PTB is complicated, it is widely recognized that protecting the vulnerable population to prevent the occurrence of PTB is an effective and feasible strategy.</p><p>The association between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PTB has been the subject of numerous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">22</xref>]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no study on whether maternal TSH levels could modulate the relationships of PM<sub>2.5</sub> with PTB. Besides, most previous studies on air pollution and birth outcomes attempted to identify susceptible windows using time periods such as trimesters or gestational months [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">23</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>]. However, a previous study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>] indicated that trimester-specific association might ignore the potential windows that span multiple trimesters and produce biased estimates.</p><p>Recently, a growing number of studies have recommended the use of more precise time windows, such as weeks, to identify the critical susceptible windows for health effects from atmospheric pollutants more accurately [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">26</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">28</xref>]. Identifying susceptible windows may help to explore the potential mechanism and provide guidance for the prenatal care of pregnant women. Nevertheless, no study has explored the susceptible windows for PTB from PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure at a weekly scale among women with abnormal preconception TSH levels.</p><p>In this study, we explored the modulating effects of TSH on the PM<sub>2.5</sub>-PTB association based on a large population-based cohort, which would provide a scientific basis for using preconception TSH levels among reproductive women as indicators for early intervention to prevent adverse birth outcomes. Our study had the following objectives: (1) to quantify and differentiate the effects of trimester-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure on PTB and on PTB subtypes among women with different preconception TSH levels and (2) to explore the susceptible windows at weekly scales.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="methods"><title>Methods</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>Study Population</title><p>We obtained data from the National Free Pre-Pregnancy Checkups Project (NFPCP), which aimed to offer free prepregnancy health examination and counseling to couples of reproductive ages who intended to become pregnant within the following 6 months. After prepregnancy examination, trained local health professionals followed up these couples through face-to-face or telephone interview to check on pregnancy status every 3 months for up to 1 year. If pregnant, health personnel would follow up with these participants on their lifestyle in the early stage of pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes after delivery. If pregnancy was not achieved within that year, follow-up was discontinued. Detailed information about how this project was designed, organized, and implemented can be found in previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">29</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">31</xref>].</p><p>The exclusion criteria for this cohort study are illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure1">Figure 1</xref>. Initially, we included 915,931 women from the NFPCP in Guangdong, China, who gave birth from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019, and had complete pregnancy outcomes. Then, we excluded 32,014 cases of fetal death, stillbirth, induced labor, or abortion; 9122 cases with multiple births; 159,778 cases with missing or extreme thyrotropin values (TSH&#x003E;500 mIU/L); 43,047 cases with missing residential addresses; 448 cases of women with missing age data or women who were not of reproductive age (&#x003C;20 or &#x003E;49 years); 6863 cases with a gestational age of less than 20 weeks or greater than 42 weeks; 122 cases that lacked data on the infant&#x2019;s sex; and 2853 cases of women who gave birth to babies with extreme birth weights (&#x003C;500 g or &#x003E;5000 g). Then, women who conceived 42 weeks before this study ended (December 31, 2019; n=28,164) were excluded, with the aim of avoiding fixed cohort bias [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">32</xref>]. In addition, 4 cases with duplicate information were excluded. Eventually, this study included 633,516 women who delivered living singletons.</p><fig position="float" id="figure1"><label>Figure 1.</label><caption><p>Flowchart of this study&#x2019;s population based on the NFPCP. NFPCP: National Free Pre-Pregnancy Checkups Project.</p></caption><graphic alt-version="no" mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="publichealth_v10i1e53879_fig01.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>Outcome</title><p>PTB, defined as delivery at a gestational age of earlier than 37 weeks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">33</xref>], was the primary outcome. In addition, we further divided PTB into 2 categories: early PTB (EPTB; 20&#x2010;33 wk of gestation) and late PTB (LPTB; 34&#x2010;36 wk of gestation) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">34</xref>]. We determined the gestational age of the mother by taking into account the first day of her last menstrual period along with the delivery date.</p></sec><sec id="s2-3"><title>Measurement and Group Classification of TSH</title><p>In our study, serum TSH levels were assessed during the preconception period. Blood samples were collected from participants at the preconception examination, which occurred within 6 months before pregnancy. The serum TSH concentration was measured using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and a TSH detection kit.</p><p>Due to the lack of authoritative guidelines on the reference range of TSH among prepregnancy women, a population-based reference range of TSH was established from the current cohort. Based on previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>], the reference population of 311,089 women was selected according to the following criteria: no previous adverse pregnancy outcomes; no history of thyroid diseases, anemia, high blood pressure, or diabetes mellitus; not taking oral contraceptives in the past; not consuming alcohol or cigarettes; having a normal BMI (18.5&#x2010;24 kg/m<sup>2</sup>); giving birth to healthy infants. The 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles for TSH levels were 0.10 mIU/L and 4.11 mIU/L, respectively. The reference range of TSH for women who planned to become pregnant in this cohort was 0.10&#x2010;4.11 mIU/L.</p><p>According to the reference range of TSH, we divided all participants into 2 groups: the normal TSH group (TSH 0.10&#x2010;4.11 mIU/L) and the abnormal TSH group (TSH &#x003C;0.10 or TSH &#x003E;4.11 mIU/L).</p></sec><sec id="s2-4"><title>Exposure Assessment</title><p>We collected daily (24 h) concentration data of PM<sub>2.5</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>) from air pollution monitoring stations located within Guangdong province from the China National Environmental Monitoring Centre. Daily concentrations of SO<sub>2</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>), NO<sub>2</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>), and O<sub>3</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>) were also obtained from the same monitoring stations for adjustment of concurrent exposure to gaseous pollutants.</p><p>We geocoded the residential addresses of all pregnant women enrolled in this study to longitude and latitude coordinates using the Gaode Maps open platform. Then, the air pollution exposure of each participant was estimated by using the inverse distance weighting (IDW) method, which has been extensively used in epidemiological research [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>]. Previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">36</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">37</xref>] have reported that the health effects of environmental exposure on fetal development varied by trimesters of pregnancy. Therefore, we estimated the exposure to air pollutants for all pregnant women during the first trimester (0&#x2010;13 wk of gestation), the second trimester (14&#x2010;26 wk of gestation), and the third trimester (27 wk of gestation to delivery), as well as the entire pregnancy. To investigate more refined critical exposure windows during pregnancy, we estimated individual exposure to air pollutants during each gestational week. The time frame of exposure for pregnant women during the entire pregnancy was shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="app1">Multimedia Appendix 1</xref>.</p><p>Furthermore, to account for potential meteorological confounding factors, we obtained daily mean ambient temperature (&#x2103;) and relative humidity (%) from meteorological monitoring stations in Guangdong province via the China Meteorological Data Sharing System. A similar approach for meteorological factors such as air pollution exposure was adopted.</p></sec><sec id="s2-5"><title>Statistical Analysis</title><p>Numbers (percentages) were used to express participants&#x2019; baseline characteristics according to TSH levels. Using Pearson correlation, we examined the correlation between air pollutants and meteorological factors in Guangdong from 2014 to 2019.</p><p>To evaluate the effect of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure throughout the whole pregnancy as well as during each trimester on PTB and PTB subtypes, Cox proportion hazard models were constructed by treating PTB as the outcome and gestational week as the time scale. The effect of prenatal PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure on PTB and its subtypes was evaluated separately in women with normal and abnormal preconception TSH levels. The effects were expressed as the hazard ratios (HR) for each 10-&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup> rise in PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration during different pregnancy periods. According to previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">38</xref>], we adjusted for maternal age (&#x003C;25, 25&#x2010;34, or &#x2265;35 years), delivery mode (vaginal delivery or cesarean delivery), prepregnancy BMI (&#x003C;18.5, 18.5&#x2010;24, 24&#x2010;28, or &#x003E;28 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), maternal smoking (yes or no), maternal drinking (yes or no), the season of delivery (spring, summer, autumn, or winter), and infant&#x2019;s sex (male or female). In addition, based on previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">38</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">39</xref>], natural splines with <italic>df</italic> of 6 and 3 were used to adjust the nonlinearity of ambient temperature and relative humidity, respectively. Moreover, we built distributed lag models incorporating Cox proportional hazards models with adjustments for the aforementioned covariates to identify more refined critical susceptible exposure windows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">40</xref>]. This model could explore the exposure-response association and lag-response association simultaneously based on a &#x201C;cross-basis&#x201D; function. In the distributed lag models of this study, the exposure-response association was assumed to vary smoothly across gestational weeks. The lag distribution of PM<sub>2.5</sub> was modeled as natural cubic splines with optimal <italic>df</italic> of 4 based on the minimum of the Akaike Information Criterion by varying <italic>df</italic> from 3 to 10. Additionally, the maximum lag range was set at week 36, since term birth was censored at week 37. The analysis was performed for EPTB and LPTB as we did for overall PTB, except that the exposure period was confined to gestational weeks 1 to 33 for early PTB.</p><p>Several sensitivity analyses were conducted. First, we changed the <italic>df</italic> for mean temperature from 5 to 7 and the <italic>df</italic> for relative humidity from 2 to 4. Second, all participants were categorized into the abnormal TSH and normal TSH groups based on the reference range of TSH (0.1&#x2010;4 mIU/L) for mothers during early pregnancy recommended by the American Thyroid Association [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">41</xref>], as some researchers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">42</xref>] suggested that pregnant women in early pregnancy and nonpregnant women have similar reference ranges for TSH. Third, we excluded participants whose baseline characteristics were missing and then conducted the analysis. Last, considering the potential confounding effect of other air pollutants (NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, or O<sub>3</sub>), 2-pollutant models were constructed to explore the relationship between atmospheric pollutants and PTB and PTB subtypes.</p><p>Statistical analysis was carried out using R (version 4.2.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing). All statistical tests were 2-sided, and all statistics were considered significant when the <italic>P</italic> value was lower than .05.</p></sec><sec id="s2-6"><title>Ethical Considerations</title><p>This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Guangdong Provincial Reproductive Science Institute (ID of the ethics approval: 202216). This study was in line with the Helsinki ethical guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Before recruitment, each participant provided written informed consent. This study used anonymized data in order to protect the privacy of participants, and no individually identifiable information was available.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><p>In total, 633,516 women were eventually included in this study. A summary of all participant&#x2019;s demographic characteristics is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Among them, 599,435 (94.6%) women had normal preconception TSH levels, while 34,081 (5.4%) women had abnormal preconception TSH levels.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure2">Figure 2</xref> shows the spatial distribution of air pollution monitoring stations, meteorological stations, PTB, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure in Guangdong, China. The average exposure levels of PM<sub>2.5</sub> throughout pregnancy were 32.5 (SD 5.8) &#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Throughout pregnancy, the average temperature for all participants was 22.9 (SD 1.4) &#x2103;, and the relative humidity was 79.9% (SD 3%). The correlation between weather conditions and exposure to air pollutants is presented in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="app2">Multimedia Appendix 2</xref>. More specifically, PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure was positively linked to NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> (Pearson <italic>r</italic> 0.552 to 0.641) and negatively correlated with O<sub>3</sub>, temperature, and relative humidity (Pearson <italic>r</italic> &#x2212;0.413 to &#x2212;0.273) throughout pregnancy.</p><table-wrap id="t1" position="float"><label>Table 1.</label><caption><p>Characteristics of study population.</p></caption><table id="table1" frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="2">Characteristics</td><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="3">Normal TSH<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table1fn1">a</xref></sup> level</td><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="3">Abnormal TSH level</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="2"/><td align="left" valign="top">Preterm births (n=22,351), n (%)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Term births (n=577,084), n (%)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Total births (n=599,435), n (%)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Preterm births (n=1335), n (%)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Term births (n=32,746), n (%)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Total births (n=34,081), n (%)</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="8"><bold>Maternal age (years)</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="char" char="." valign="top">&#x003C;25</td><td align="left" valign="top">8486 (38)</td><td align="left" valign="top">192,117 (33.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">200,603 (33.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">484 (36.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">10,237 (31.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">10,721 (31.5)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="char" char="." valign="top">25&#x2010;34</td><td align="left" valign="top">12,528 (56.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top">349,170 (60.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">361,698 (60.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">746 (55.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top">20,196 (61.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">20,942 (61.5)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="char" char="." valign="top">&#x003E;35</td><td align="left" valign="top">1337 (5.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top">35,797 (6.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">37,134 (6.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">105 (7.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2313 (7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2418 (7)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="8"><bold>Prepregnancy BMI (kg/m</bold><sup><bold>2</bold></sup><bold>)</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="char" char="." valign="top">&#x003C;18.5</td><td align="left" valign="top">4794 (21.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">114,416 (19.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top">119,210 (19.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top">346 (25.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top">8042 (24.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top">8388 (24.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="char" char="." valign="top">18.5&#x2010;24</td><td align="left" valign="top">14,780 (66.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top">384,525 (66.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top">399,305 (66.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top">837 (62.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">20,977 (64.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top">21,814 (64)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="char" char="." valign="top">24&#x2010;28</td><td align="left" valign="top">2147 (9.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top">61,907 (10.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">64,054 (10.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">112 (8.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2887 (8.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2999 (8.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="char" char="." valign="top">&#x003E;28</td><td align="left" valign="top">495 (2.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">13,057 (2.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">13,552 (2.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">28 (2.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top">588 (1.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top">616 (1.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Missing data</td><td align="left" valign="top">135 (0.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top">3179 (0.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">3314 (0.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">12 (0.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top">252 (0.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">264 (0.8)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="8"><bold>Maternal smoking during pregnancy</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Yes</td><td align="left" valign="top">52 (0.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1374 (0.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1426 (0.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2 (0.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">103 (0.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">105 (0.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">No</td><td align="left" valign="top">22,197 (99.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">573,321 (99.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">595,518 (99.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1327 (99.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">32,523 (99.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">33,850 (99.3)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Missing data</td><td align="left" valign="top">102 (0.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2389 (0.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2491 (0.42)</td><td align="left" valign="top">6 (0.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">120 (0.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">126 (0.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="8"><bold>Maternal drinking during pregnancy</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Yes</td><td align="left" valign="top">1388 (6.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">36,001 (6.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">37,389 (6.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">102 (7.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2526 (7.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2628 (7.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">No</td><td align="left" valign="top">20,776 (93)</td><td align="left" valign="top">537,184 (93.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top">557,960 (93.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top">1218 (91.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">30,040 (91.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">31,258 (91.7)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Missing data</td><td align="left" valign="top">187 (0.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top">3899 (00.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">4086 (0.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">15 (1.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top">180 (0.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top">195 (0.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="8"><bold>Mode of delivery</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Vaginal</td><td align="left" valign="top">18,089 (80.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top">454,502 (78.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top">472,591(78.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top">999 (74.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top">24,421 (74.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top">25,420 (74.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Cesarean</td><td align="left" valign="top">4262 (19.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top">122,582 (21.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">126,844 (21.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">336 (25.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">8325 (25.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">8681 (25.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="8"><bold>Infant&#x2019;s sex</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Male</td><td align="left" valign="top">12,315 (55.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top">302,807 (52.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">315,122 (52.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top">722 (54.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top">16,525 (50.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">17,247 (50.6)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Female</td><td align="left" valign="top">10,036 (44.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top">274,277 (47.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">284,313 (47.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">613 (45.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top">16,221 (49.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">16,834 (49.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="8"><bold>Season of delivery</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Spring</td><td align="left" valign="top">5040 (22.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">134,507 (23.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">139,547 (23.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">306 (22.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top">8001 (24.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">8307 (24.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Summer</td><td align="left" valign="top">5511 (24.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">124,202 (21.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">129,713 (21.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top">326 (24.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">6969 (21.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">7295 (21.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Autumn</td><td align="left" valign="top">6183 (27.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">159,983 (27.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">166,166 (27.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">351 (26.3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">8661 (26.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">9012 (26.4)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Winter</td><td align="left" valign="top">5617 (25.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top">158,392 (27.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">164,009 (27.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">352 (26.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">9115 (27.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top">9467 (27.8)</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="table1fn1"><p><sup>a</sup>TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><fig position="float" id="figure2"><label>Figure 2.</label><caption><p>Geographical distribution of air pollution monitoring stations, meteorological monitoring stations, and preterm birth and spatial variation of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration. (<bold>A</bold>) Spatial distribution of air pollution and meteorological monitoring stations. (<bold>B</bold>) Geographical distribution of preterm birth and spatial variation of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration, as estimated by using the IDW spatial interpolation algorithm, from 2014 to 2019. E: east; IDW: inverse distance weighting; KM: kilometer; N: north; PM<sub>2.5</sub>: particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of &#x2264;2.5 &#x03BC;m; S: south; W: west.</p></caption><graphic alt-version="no" mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="publichealth_v10i1e53879_fig02.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="t2" position="float"><label>Table 2.</label><caption><p>Summary of air pollutant exposure and weather conditions during the pregnancies of all participants.</p></caption><table id="table2" frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><td align="left" valign="bottom" colspan="2">Variables</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Mean (SD)</td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Min<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table2fn1">a</xref></sup></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">Max<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table2fn2">b</xref></sup></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">25th<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table2fn3">c</xref></sup></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">50th<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table2fn4">d</xref></sup></td><td align="left" valign="bottom">75th<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table2fn5">e</xref></sup></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="8"><bold>First trimester</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">PM<sub>2.5</sub><sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table2fn6">f</xref></sup> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">32.6 (10.1)</td><td align="left" valign="top">9</td><td align="left" valign="top">74</td><td align="left" valign="top">25.2</td><td align="left" valign="top">32</td><td align="left" valign="top">38.8</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">O<sub>3</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">54.4 (10.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top">8.6</td><td align="left" valign="top">93.7</td><td align="left" valign="top">47.6</td><td align="left" valign="top">54.8</td><td align="left" valign="top">62.3</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">SO<sub>2</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">12.5 (4.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">3.8</td><td align="left" valign="top">35.7</td><td align="left" valign="top">9.2</td><td align="left" valign="top">11.6</td><td align="left" valign="top">14.6</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">NO<sub>2</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">26.7 (12.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">5.8</td><td align="left" valign="top">82.9</td><td align="left" valign="top">16.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">24.2</td><td align="left" valign="top">34.9</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Temperature (&#x2103;)</td><td align="left" valign="top">22.9 (1.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">13.3</td><td align="left" valign="top">27.7</td><td align="left" valign="top">22.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">23</td><td align="left" valign="top">23.7</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Relative humidity (%)</td><td align="left" valign="top">79.8 (3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">66.9</td><td align="left" valign="top">89.6</td><td align="left" valign="top">77.7</td><td align="left" valign="top">80</td><td align="left" valign="top">82.1</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="8"><bold>Second trimester</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">PM<sub>2.5</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">31.8 (10.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">9.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">72.3</td><td align="left" valign="top">24</td><td align="left" valign="top">31.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">38.2</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">O<sub>3</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">55.2 (10.6)</td><td align="left" valign="top">10.9</td><td align="left" valign="top">94.2</td><td align="left" valign="top">48.6</td><td align="left" valign="top">55.3</td><td align="left" valign="top">62.9</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">SO<sub>2</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">12.2 (4.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">3.2</td><td align="left" valign="top">35.5</td><td align="left" valign="top">9.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">11.5</td><td align="left" valign="top">14.4</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">NO<sub>2</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">26.3 (12.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">5.5</td><td align="left" valign="top">82.9</td><td align="left" valign="top">15.6</td><td align="left" valign="top">23.5</td><td align="left" valign="top">34.4</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Temperature (&#x2103;)</td><td align="left" valign="top">23 (1.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">13.4</td><td align="left" valign="top">27.6</td><td align="left" valign="top">22.2</td><td align="left" valign="top">23.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">23.8</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Relative humidity (%)</td><td align="left" valign="top">80 (3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">68.2</td><td align="left" valign="top">89.6</td><td align="left" valign="top">77.9</td><td align="left" valign="top">80.2</td><td align="left" valign="top">82.2</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="8"><bold>Third trimester</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">PM<sub>2.5</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">33.1 (10.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">7.7</td><td align="left" valign="top">82</td><td align="left" valign="top">25.4</td><td align="left" valign="top">32.7</td><td align="left" valign="top">39.9</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">O<sub>3</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">56.3 (10.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top">11.5</td><td align="left" valign="top">110.2</td><td align="left" valign="top">49.6</td><td align="left" valign="top">56.7</td><td align="left" valign="top">64.1</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">SO<sub>2</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">12.2 (4.2)</td><td align="left" valign="top">2.8</td><td align="left" valign="top">35.9</td><td align="left" valign="top">9.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">11.5</td><td align="left" valign="top">14.3</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">NO<sub>2</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">27 (12.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top">5.8</td><td align="left" valign="top">93.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">16.3</td><td align="left" valign="top">24.3</td><td align="left" valign="top">35.2</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Temperature (&#x2103;)</td><td align="left" valign="top">22.9 (1.4)</td><td align="left" valign="top">11.9</td><td align="left" valign="top">29.3</td><td align="left" valign="top">22.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">23</td><td align="left" valign="top">23.8</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Relative humidity (%)</td><td align="left" valign="top">79.9 (3)</td><td align="left" valign="top">61</td><td align="left" valign="top">89.4</td><td align="left" valign="top">77.8</td><td align="left" valign="top">80.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">82.1</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="8"><bold>Entire pregnancy</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">PM<sub>2.5</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">32.5 (5.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top">16</td><td align="left" valign="top">59.7</td><td align="left" valign="top">28.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">32.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">36.4</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">O<sub>3</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">55.3 (7.7)</td><td align="left" valign="top">15.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">85.2</td><td align="left" valign="top">50.4</td><td align="left" valign="top">55.9</td><td align="left" valign="top">60.8</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">SO<sub>2</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">12.3 (3.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top">4.2</td><td align="left" valign="top">30.6</td><td align="left" valign="top">9.7</td><td align="left" valign="top">11.7</td><td align="left" valign="top">13.9</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">NO<sub>2</sub> (&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="left" valign="top">26.6 (11.5)</td><td align="left" valign="top">8.4</td><td align="left" valign="top">69.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">16</td><td align="left" valign="top">23.7</td><td align="left" valign="top">35</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Temperature (&#x2103;)</td><td align="left" valign="top">22.9 (0.9)</td><td align="left" valign="top">18.3</td><td align="left" valign="top">25.8</td><td align="left" valign="top">22.4</td><td align="left" valign="top">23.1</td><td align="left" valign="top">23.6</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Relative humidity (%)</td><td align="left" valign="top">79.9 (2.8)</td><td align="left" valign="top">69.5</td><td align="left" valign="top">88.3</td><td align="left" valign="top">77.9</td><td align="left" valign="top">80</td><td align="left" valign="top">82.1</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="table2fn1"><p><sup>a</sup>Min: minimum.</p></fn><fn id="table2fn2"><p><sup>b</sup>Max: maximum.</p></fn><fn id="table2fn3"><p><sup>c</sup>25th: 25th percentile.</p></fn><fn id="table2fn4"><p><sup>d</sup>50th: 50th percentile.</p></fn><fn id="table2fn5"><p><sup>e</sup>75th: 75th percentile.</p></fn><fn id="table2fn6"><p><sup>f</sup>PM<sub>2.5</sub>: particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of &#x2264;2.5 &#x03BC;m.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>The effect of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure at various stages of pregnancy on PTB and its subtypes is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. For women with normal and abnormal prepregnancy TSH levels, positive associations were observed between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and the risks of PTB at each trimester and throughout pregnancy. Notably, the effects were greater among women with abnormal preconception TSH levels. For instance, for women with abnormal and normal preconception TSH levels, each 10-&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup> rise in PM<sub>2.5</sub> throughout pregnancy was linked to a 55.9% (HR 1.559, 95% CI 1.390&#x2010;1.748) and 34.5% (HR 1.345, 95% CI 1.307&#x2010;1.385) increase in risks of PTB, respectively. In addition, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> also presents the relationship between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and risks of EPTB, as well as LPTB. The results for PTB subtypes were approximately consistent with those for all PTBs. Generally, the associations with LPTB were higher than those with EPTB. For EPTB, we observed significant associations among women with abnormal TSH levels (HR 1.559, 95% CI 1.227&#x2010;1.980) and women with normal TSH levels (HR 1.203, 95% CI 1.126&#x2010;1.285) with each 10-&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup><inline-graphic xlink:href="53879ilf01.png"/>increase of PM<sub>2.5</sub> during the entire pregnancy. As for LPTB, significant associations were also observed, with the corresponding HRs being 1.571 (95% CI 1.379&#x2010;1.791) and 1.386 (95% CI 1.342&#x2010;1.432), respectively.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure3">Figure 3</xref> shows the associations between weekly specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and PTB. For women with abnormal preconception TSH levels, PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure between the 3rd and 13th weeks of pregnancy, along with the 28th to 35th weeks of pregnancy, were linked to elevated risks of PTB, with the strongest association observed during the 35th week (HR 1.028, 95% CI 1.004&#x2010;1.053). For women with normal preconception TSH levels, the exposure windows were the 1st-13th and the 21st-35th weeks of gestation, with the peak association occurring at the 29th week (HR 1.017, 95% CI 1.014&#x2010;1.018). There were similar identified exposure windows and magnitudes of associations between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and EPTB, LPTB, and overall PTB.</p><table-wrap id="t3" position="float"><label>Table 3.</label><caption><p>Associations between trimester-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub><sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table3fn1">a</xref></sup> exposure and risk of PTB<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table3fn2">b</xref></sup> according to maternal prepregnancy status of TSH<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table3fn3">c</xref></sup><sup>,</sup><sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table3fn4">d</xref></sup>.</p></caption><table id="table3" frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="2">PTB types and gestational period</td><td align="left" valign="top">Normal TSH, HR<sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table3fn5">e</xref></sup><sup>,</sup><sup><xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="table3fn6">f</xref></sup> (95% CI)</td><td align="left" valign="top">Abnormal TSH, HR (95% CI)</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4"><bold>All PTBs</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">First trimester</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.111 (1.095&#x2010;1.127)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.129 (1.064&#x2010;1.198)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Second trimester</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.117 (1.098&#x2010;1.136)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.270 (1.186&#x2010;1.360)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Third trimester</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.044 (1.029&#x2010;1.060)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.087 (1.0231.155)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Entire pregnancy</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.345 (1.307&#x2010;1.385)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.559 (1.390&#x2010;1.748)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4"><bold>Early PTB</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">First trimester</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.108 (1.072&#x2010;1.145)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.102 (0.972&#x2010;1.248)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Second trimester</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.034 (0.995&#x2010;1.075)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.355 (1.175&#x2010;1.563)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Third trimester</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.069 (1.030&#x2010;1.110)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.109 (0.967&#x2010;1.272)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Entire pregnancy</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.203 (1.126&#x2010;1.285)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.559 (1.227&#x2010;1.980)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top" colspan="4"><bold>Late PTB</bold></td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">First trimester</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.113 (1.095&#x2010;1.131)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.139 (1.065&#x2010;1.218)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Second trimester</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.138 (1.117&#x2010;1.160)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.249 (1.156&#x2010;1.351)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Third trimester</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.039 (1.022&#x2010;1.056)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.084 (1.013&#x2010;1.160)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" valign="top"/><td align="left" valign="top">Entire pregnancy</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.386 (1.342&#x2010;1.432)</td><td align="char" char="." valign="top">1.571 (1.379&#x2010;1.791)</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><fn id="table3fn1"><p><sup>a</sup>PM<sub>2.5</sub>: particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 &#x03BC;m or less.</p></fn><fn id="table3fn2"><p><sup>b</sup>PTB: preterm birth.</p></fn><fn id="table3fn3"><p><sup>c</sup>TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone.</p></fn><fn id="table3fn4"><p><sup>d</sup>Model was adjusted for maternal age, delivery mode, prepregnancy BMI, maternal smoking, maternal drinking, delivery season, and infant&#x2019;s sex, as well as for mean ambient temperature and relative humidity during the pregnancy with natural cubic splines of 6 and 3 <italic>df</italic>, respectively.</p></fn><fn id="table3fn5"><p><sup>e</sup>HR: hazard ratio.</p></fn><fn id="table3fn6"><p><sup>f</sup>Hazard ratios are based on 10-&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup> increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><fig position="float" id="figure3"><label>Figure 3.</label><caption><p>Associations between weekly specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and risk of PTB according to maternal prepregnancy status of TSH. DLMs incorporating Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the HR (95% CI) for each 10-&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup> increment in PM<sub>2.5</sub> during gestation weeks. The model was adjusted for maternal age, delivery mode, prepregnancy BMI, maternal smoking, maternal drinking, delivery season, and infant&#x2019;s sex, as well as for mean ambient temperature and relative humidity during the pregnancy with natural cubic splines of 6 and 3 <italic>df</italic>, respectively. DLM: distributed lag model; EPTB: early preterm birth; HR: hazard ratio; LPTB: late preterm birth; PM<sub>2.5</sub>: particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of &#x2264;2.5 &#x03BC;m; PTB: preterm birth; TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone.</p></caption><graphic alt-version="no" mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="publichealth_v10i1e53879_fig03.png"/></fig><p>In sensitivity analyses, the results did not bring substantial changes. We obtained similar results when changing the <italic>df</italic> for temperature and relative humidity (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="app3">Multimedia Appendix 3</xref>). Similar results were observed when using 0.10&#x2010;4.0 mIU/L as the reference range of preconception TSH (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="app4">Multimedia Appendix 4</xref>). The results were similar when we excluded participants whose baseline characteristics were missing from the analysis (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="app5">Multimedia Appendix 5</xref>). Furthermore, the results of the 2-pollutant models were found to be similar to those of the single-pollutant models (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure4">Figure 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="app6">Multimedia Appendices 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="app7">7</xref>). In general, we also observed positive associations between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and PTB in 2-pollutant models among women with abnormal preconception TSH levels and women with normal preconception TSH levels.</p><fig position="float" id="figure4"><label>Figure 4.</label><caption><p>HR (95% CI) of PTB associated with each 10-&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup> increase in air pollutant concentration during the pregnancy in 2-pollutant models compared to single-pollutant models. Single-pollutant models were adjusted for maternal age, delivery mode, prepregnancy BMI, maternal smoking, maternal drinking, delivery season, and infant&#x2019;s sex, as well as for mean ambient temperature and relative humidity during the pregnancy with natural cubic splines of 6 and 3 <italic>df</italic>, respectively. Further, 2-pollutant models were adjusted for the variable considered in single-pollutant models, in addition to including the air pollutant shown above. HR: hazard ratio; PM<sub>2.5</sub>: particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of &#x2264;2.5 &#x03BC;m; PTB: preterm birth; TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone.</p></caption><graphic alt-version="no" mimetype="image" position="float" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="publichealth_v10i1e53879_fig04.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion"><title>Discussion</title><sec id="s4-1"><title>Principal Findings</title><p>We investigated the associations between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and PTB in women with abnormal and normal preconception TSH levels. This study is the first to examine the modulating effect of preconception TSH levels on the association between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and PTB. According to our study, PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure throughout the entire pregnancy was linked to elevated risks of PTB in women with abnormal and normal preconception TSH levels. Our findings would provide important population-based evidence and a scientific basis for preconception care to further promote maternal and child health.</p><p>There is increasing research on the relationship between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and PTB. Among women with abnormal and normal preconception TSH levels, our study observed a positive association between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PTB, similar to previous studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">43</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>]. For instance, Laurent et al [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>] found that for every increase in the IQR of PM<sub>2.5</sub> throughout the pregnancy, the risks of PTB increased by 13.3%. However, no significant association has been found in some studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref44">44</xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref47">47</xref>]. Disagreement among studies may be due to differences in the study design, exposure levels to air pollutants, particulate matter components, as well as the sample size.</p><p>Additionally, in women with abnormal preconception TSH levels, stronger associations between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and PTB were found compared to women with normal preconception TSH levels. A previous study indicated that thyroid hormone might play a role in inflammation related to PTB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref48">48</xref>]. In addition, some researchers found that PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure could contribute to inflammation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref49">49</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref50">50</xref>]. We hypothesize that the exacerbated risk of PTB observed in women with thyroid dysfunction might be attributed to a higher vulnerability to the inflammatory and oxidative stress effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub>. The interrelationship between thyroid disorder and increased susceptibility to environmental pollutants could be explained by several mechanisms. First, thyroid dysfunction may impair the body&#x2019;s antioxidant defenses, rendering individuals more susceptible to oxidative damage induced by PM<sub>2.5</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref51">51</xref>]. Second, altered thyroid hormone levels can disrupt the immune system balance, potentially exacerbating the inflammatory response to air pollution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref52">52</xref>]. Additionally, maternal thyroid disorder may increase the risk of gestational diabetes and hypertension, which are risk factors for PTB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref53">53</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref54">54</xref>]. However, the underlying biological mechanisms of these associations remain unclear due to the lack of toxicological evidence. Further studies are warranted to explore how TSH levels modulate the effects of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure on PTB.</p><p>Furthermore, our study also identified the sensitive exposure windows. We found that the sensitive windows might be the 3rd-13th and 28th-35th gestational weeks for women with abnormal preconception TSH levels. We also found that the sensitive windows might be the 1st-13th and the 21st-35th gestational weeks for women with normal preconception TSH levels. It appears that early pregnancy and late pregnancy might be the susceptible exposure windows. A previous study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">55</xref>] suggested that PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure in late pregnancy may stimulate the release of cytokines that promote inflammation, thereby triggering PTB. Additionally, some studies have suggested [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref55">55</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref56">56</xref>] that early pregnancy might be the most sensitive window. However, there has been no consistent conclusion regarding the susceptible exposure window. Therefore, further studies are warranted to confirm our results.</p><p>Only a very small number of studies have explored the relationship between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and specific PTB subtypes. Our study found a stronger association between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure during the entire pregnancy and LPTB than that between such PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and EPTB in women with abnormal and normal preconception TSH levels. We speculate that the effects of air pollution may be &#x201C;masked&#x201D; by other risk factors such as intrauterine infections and nutritional deficiencies in infants born early preterm.</p><p>Our study results have important public health implications. Previous studies have noted that PTB could place significant burdens on families, health systems, and socioeconomics. To mitigate the risks of PTB, women with abnormal preconception TSH levels should take additional protective measures against air pollution, as they were identified as the susceptible population in this study. For women with abnormal preconception TSH levels, we recommend enhancing the education on reproductive knowledge and improving the accessibility of health care services.</p><p>Our study has several strengths. First of all, this study has a relatively large sample size, enabling sufficient statistical power to assess the modulating effect of TSH on the impact of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure on PTB. Second, we explored more precise susceptible windows, which could help us to develop specific clinical and public health interventions to reduce the risks of PTB, as well as inform research on potential etiological mechanisms regarding the relationship between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PTB. Third, we investigated the relationships between PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and PTB subtypes as well.</p><p>However, several limitations should be noted. First, we did not collect the TSH levels during pregnancy. Therefore, classification based on preconception TSH alone may not be adequate to accurately reflect the modulating effects of serum TSH levels on the association between PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PTB. Second, couples who participated in the NFPCP were those who intended to become pregnant, which may have led to selection bias with regard to those with unplanned pregnancies. More specifically, participants who plan to become pregnant will be less exposed to other risk factors compared to those with unplanned pregnancies owing to them taking protective measures or developing a healthy lifestyle. Third, air pollution exposure for all participants was estimated based on the residential addresses using the IDW method, a common practice in environmental health research [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">25</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">27</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">35</xref>]. This method assumes spatial continuity, where PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations at unmeasured locations are interpolated based on nearby monitoring station data, adhering to the principle that environmental measurements in closer proximity are more similar than those farther apart. While this approach requires assumptions about spatial distribution and participant mobility, the IDW method was used for its applicability in large-scale epidemiological studies where direct, individual-level exposure measurement is challenging. More advanced exposure assessment methods, such as land use regression or random forest, were not conducted in this study because we did not have research data such as land use information, which is often used in these exposure assessment methods. Future studies should consider more accurate exposure assessment methods. In addition, we did not consider the mobility of participants due to unavailable information on residential mobility. Therefore, exposure misclassification was possible in this study. Fourth, due to the lack of relevant information, some confounding factors, such as thyroid-related medications, were not adjusted in the model.</p></sec><sec id="s4-2"><title>Conclusion</title><p>In summary, PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure during pregnancy increased PTB risks for women with abnormal and normal preconception TSH levels. Additionally, stronger associations were found among women with abnormal preconception TSH levels. Moreover, women in early or late pregnancy appear to be more vulnerable to harmful effects from air pollution. Additional protective measures against air pollution, such as wearing masks and using air purifiers, should be taken, especially for pregnant women with abnormal preconception TSH levels.</p></sec></sec></body><back><ack><p>We thank the China National Environmental Monitoring Centre for providing open monitoring data of air pollutants. The study was funded by the Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2022A1515011517). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of this paper.</p></ack><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>None declared.</p></fn></fn-group><glossary><title>Abbreviations</title><def-list><def-item><term id="abb1">EPTB</term><def><p>early preterm birth</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="abb2">HR</term><def><p>hazard ratio</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="abb3">IDW</term><def><p>inverse distance weighting</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="abb4">LPTB</term><def><p>late preterm birth</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="abb5">NFPCP</term><def><p>National Free Pre-Pregnancy Checkups Project</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="abb6">PM<sub>2.5</sub></term><def><p>particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of &#x2264;2.5 &#x03BC;m</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="abb7">PTB</term><def><p>preterm birth</p></def></def-item><def-item><term id="abb8">TSH</term><def><p>thyroid stimulating hormone</p></def></def-item></def-list></glossary><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="ref1"><label>1</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Brauer</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Lencar</surname><given-names>C</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Tamburic</surname><given-names>L</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Koehoorn</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Demers</surname><given-names>P</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Karr</surname><given-names>C</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>A cohort study of traffic-related air pollution impacts on birth outcomes</article-title><source>Environ Health Perspect</source><year>2008</year><volume>116</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>680</fpage><lpage>686</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1289/ehp.10952</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">18470315</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref2"><label>2</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>P</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>H</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Ambient air pollution and markers of fetal growth: a retrospective population-based cohort study of 2.57 million term singleton births in China</article-title><source>Environ Int</source><year>2020</year><volume>135</volume><fpage>105410</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envint.2019.105410</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">31884132</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref3"><label>3</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Loizeau</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Buteau</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Chaix</surname><given-names>B</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>McElroy</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Counil</surname><given-names>E</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Benmarhnia</surname><given-names>T</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Does the air pollution model influence the evidence of socio-economic disparities in exposure and susceptibility?</article-title><source>Environ Res</source><year>2018</year><volume>167</volume><fpage>650</fpage><lpage>661</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2018.08.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">30241004</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref4"><label>4</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ohuma</surname><given-names>EO</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Moller</surname><given-names>AB</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Bradley</surname><given-names>E</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>National, regional, and global estimates of preterm birth in 2020, with trends from 2010: a systematic analysis</article-title><source>Lancet</source><year>2023</year><month>10</month><day>7</day><volume>402</volume><issue>10409</issue><fpage>1261</fpage><lpage>1271</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00878-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">37805217</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref5"><label>5</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Frey</surname><given-names>HA</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Klebanoff</surname><given-names>MA</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>The epidemiology, etiology, and costs of preterm birth</article-title><source>Semin Fetal Neonatal Med</source><year>2016</year><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>68</fpage><lpage>73</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.siny.2015.12.011</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">26794420</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref6"><label>6</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>JJ</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Axelrad</surname><given-names>DA</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Dockins</surname><given-names>C</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Preterm birth and economic benefits of reduced maternal exposure to fine particulate matter</article-title><source>Environ Res</source><year>2019</year><volume>170</volume><fpage>178</fpage><lpage>186</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.013</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">30583127</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref7"><label>7</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bekkar</surname><given-names>B</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Pacheco</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Basu</surname><given-names>R</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>DeNicola</surname><given-names>N</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Association of air pollution and heat exposure with preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirth in the US: a systematic review</article-title><source>JAMA Netw Open</source><year>2020</year><volume>3</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>e208243</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8243</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">32556259</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref8"><label>8</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>C</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ren</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Maternal PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure triggers preterm birth: a cross-sectional study in Wuhan, China</article-title><source>Glob Health Res Policy</source><year>2020</year><volume>5</volume><fpage>17</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s41256-020-00144-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">32377568</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref9"><label>9</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hooper</surname><given-names>LG</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Kaufman</surname><given-names>JD</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Ambient air pollution and clinical implications for susceptible populations</article-title><source>Ann Am Thorac Soc</source><year>2018</year><volume>15</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><fpage>S64</fpage><lpage>S68</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1513/AnnalsATS.201707-574MG</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">29676646</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref10"><label>10</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lavigne</surname><given-names>E</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yasseen</surname><given-names>AS</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Stieb</surname><given-names>DM</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Ambient air pollution and adverse birth outcomes: differences by maternal comorbidities</article-title><source>Environ Res</source><year>2016</year><volume>148</volume><fpage>457</fpage><lpage>466</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2016.04.026</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">27136671</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref11"><label>11</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>AC</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Stagnaro-Green</surname><given-names>A</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Differences in diagnostic criteria mask the true prevalence of thyroid disease in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title><source>Thyroid</source><year>2019</year><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>278</fpage><lpage>289</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/thy.2018.0475</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">30444186</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref12"><label>12</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Q</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>The mediation effect of maternal glucose on the association between ambient air pollution and birth weight in Foshan, China</article-title><source>Environ Pollut</source><year>2020</year><month>11</month><volume>266</volume><issue>Pt 1</issue><fpage>115128</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115128</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">32650160</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref13"><label>13</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Shan</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Teng</surname><given-names>W</given-names> </name><collab>Thyroid Disorders, Iodine Status and Diabetes Epidemiological Survey Group</collab></person-group><article-title>Estimated change in prevalence of abnormal thyroid-stimulating hormone levels in China according to the application of the kit-recommended or NACB standard reference interval</article-title><source>EClinicalMedicine</source><year>2021</year><volume>32</volume><fpage>100723</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100723</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">33554090</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref14"><label>14</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Arbib</surname><given-names>N</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Hadar</surname><given-names>E</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Sneh-Arbib</surname><given-names>O</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>R</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wiznitzer</surname><given-names>A</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Gabbay-Benziv</surname><given-names>R</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>First trimester thyroid stimulating hormone as an independent risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcome</article-title><source>J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med</source><year>2017</year><volume>30</volume><issue>18</issue><fpage>2174</fpage><lpage>2178</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14767058.2016.1242123</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref15"><label>15</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>X</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>H</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Preconception TSH and pregnancy outcomes: a population-based cohort study in 184 611 women</article-title><source>Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)</source><year>2017</year><volume>86</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>816</fpage><lpage>824</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/cen.13329</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">28295470</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref16"><label>16</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>T</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>J</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Preconception thyrotropin levels and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in Chinese women aged 20 to 49 years</article-title><source>JAMA Netw Open</source><year>2021</year><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>e215723</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5723</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">33847747</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref17"><label>17</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>G</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Abramson</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Williams</surname><given-names>G</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Exposure to low concentrations of air pollutants and adverse birth outcomes in Brisbane, Australia, 2003-2013</article-title><source>Sci Total Environ</source><year>2018</year><month>05</month><day>1</day><volume>622-623</volume><fpage>721</fpage><lpage>726</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.050</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">29223898</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref18"><label>18</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chu</surname><given-names>C</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>C</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Ambient fine particulate matter air pollution and the risk of preterm birth: a multicenter birth cohort study in China</article-title><source>Environ Pollut</source><year>2021</year><volume>287</volume><fpage>117629</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117629</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">34182393</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref19"><label>19</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ha</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Martinez</surname><given-names>V</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Chan-Golston</surname><given-names>AM</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Air pollution and preterm birth: a time-stratified case-crossover study in the San Joaquin Valley of California</article-title><source>Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol</source><year>2022</year><month>01</month><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>80</fpage><lpage>89</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppe.12836</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">34872160</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref20"><label>20</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>He</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Composition of fine particulate matter and risk of preterm birth: a nationwide birth cohort study in 336 Chinese cities</article-title><source>J Hazard Mater</source><year>2022</year><volume>425</volume><fpage>127645</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127645</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref21"><label>21</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ilango</surname><given-names>SD</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Schwarz</surname><given-names>L</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Examining the joint effects of heatwaves, air pollution, and green space on the risk of preterm birth in California</article-title><source>Environ Res Lett</source><year>2020</year><volume>15</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>104099</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1748-9326/abb8a3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">34659452</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref22"><label>22</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tapia</surname><given-names>VL</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Vasquez-Apestegui</surname><given-names>BV</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Alcantara-Zapata</surname><given-names>D</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Vu</surname><given-names>B</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Steenland</surname><given-names>K</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Gonzales</surname><given-names>GF</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Association between maximum temperature and PM<sub>2.5</sub> with pregnancy outcomes in Lima, Peru</article-title><source>Environ Epidemiol</source><year>2021</year><month>11</month><day>12</day><volume>5</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>e179</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/EE9.0000000000000179</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">34909559</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref23"><label>23</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>J</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Migrant population is more vulnerable to the effect of air pollution on preterm birth: results from a birth cohort study in seven Chinese cities</article-title><source>Int J Hyg Environ Health</source><year>2019</year><month>08</month><volume>222</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>1047</fpage><lpage>1053</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.07.004</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">31320307</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref24"><label>24</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>J</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>D</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>P</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>X</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>The association between air pollution and preterm birth and low birth weight in Guangdong, China</article-title><source>BMC Public Health</source><year>2019</year><month>01</month><day>3</day><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>3</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12889-018-6307-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">30606145</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref25"><label>25</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>G</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>J</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Prenatal exposure to air pollution and the risk of preterm birth in rural population of Henan Province</article-title><source>Chemosphere</source><year>2022</year><month>01</month><volume>286</volume><issue>Pt 2</issue><fpage>131833</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131833</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">34426128</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref26"><label>26</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wilson</surname><given-names>A</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Chiu</surname><given-names>YHM</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Hsu</surname><given-names>HHL</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wright</surname><given-names>RO</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wright</surname><given-names>RJ</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Coull</surname><given-names>BA</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Potential for bias when estimating critical windows for air pollution in children's health</article-title><source>Am J Epidemiol</source><year>2017</year><volume>186</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>1281</fpage><lpage>1289</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aje/kwx184</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">29206986</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref27"><label>27</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shang</surname><given-names>L</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>L</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>W</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Prenatal exposure to air pollution and the risk of macrosomia: identifying windows of susceptibility</article-title><source>Sci Total Environ</source><year>2022</year><month>04</month><day>20</day><volume>818</volume><fpage>151775</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151775</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">34808172</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref28"><label>28</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Q</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Benmarhnia</surname><given-names>T</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>H</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Identifying windows of susceptibility for maternal exposure to ambient air pollution and preterm birth</article-title><source>Environ Int</source><year>2018</year><month>12</month><volume>121</volume><issue>Pt 1</issue><fpage>317</fpage><lpage>324</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.021</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">30241019</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref29"><label>29</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Q</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>YY</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Folic acid supplementation and the association between maternal airborne particulate matter exposure and preterm delivery: a national birth cohort study in China</article-title><source>Environ Health Perspect</source><year>2020</year><month>12</month><volume>128</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>127010</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1289/EHP6386</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">33337244</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref30"><label>30</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>He</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Q</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Preconception blood pressure and risk of preterm birth: a large historical cohort study in a Chinese rural population</article-title><source>Fertil Steril</source><year>2015</year><volume>104</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>124</fpage><lpage>130</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.03.024</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">25936235</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref31"><label>31</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Q</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>H</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Design of the national free proception health examination project in China</article-title><source>Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi</source><year>2015</year><month>01</month><day>20</day><volume>95</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>162</fpage><lpage>165</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">25877024</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref32"><label>32</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Strand</surname><given-names>LB</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Barnett</surname><given-names>AG</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Tong</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Methodological challenges when estimating the effects of season and seasonal exposures on birth outcomes</article-title><source>BMC Med Res Methodol</source><year>2011</year><volume>11</volume><fpage>49</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2288-11-49</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">21501523</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref33"><label>33</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Blencowe</surname><given-names>H</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Cousens</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Oestergaard</surname><given-names>MZ</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications</article-title><source>Obstetric Anesthesia Digest</source><year>2013</year><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>142</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/01.aoa.0000432360.25014.c3</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref34"><label>34</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Davidoff</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Dias</surname><given-names>T</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Damus</surname><given-names>K</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Changes in the gestational age distribution among U.S. singleton births: impact on rates of late preterm birth, 1992 to 2002</article-title><source>Semin Perinatol</source><year>2006</year><month>02</month><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>8</fpage><lpage>15</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1053/j.semperi.2006.01.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">16549207</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref35"><label>35</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>P</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>T</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Maternal air pollution exposure and preterm birth in Wuxi, China: effect modification by maternal age</article-title><source>Ecotoxicol Environ Saf</source><year>2018</year><month>08</month><day>15</day><volume>157</volume><fpage>457</fpage><lpage>462</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.04.002</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">29655847</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref36"><label>36</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kingsley</surname><given-names>SL</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Eliot</surname><given-names>MN</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Glazer</surname><given-names>K</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Maternal ambient air pollution, preterm birth and markers of fetal growth in Rhode Island: results of a hospital-based linkage study</article-title><source>J Epidemiol Community Health</source><year>2017</year><month>12</month><volume>71</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1131</fpage><lpage>1136</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/jech-2017-208963</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">28947670</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref37"><label>37</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Siddika</surname><given-names>N</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Rantala</surname><given-names>AK</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Antikainen</surname><given-names>H</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Synergistic effects of prenatal exposure to fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) on the risk of preterm birth: a population-based cohort study</article-title><source>Environ Res</source><year>2019</year><month>09</month><volume>176</volume><fpage>108549</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2019.108549</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">31252204</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref38"><label>38</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>L</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Qiu</surname><given-names>J</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure increases the risk of preterm birth in pre-pregnancy impaired fasting glucose women: a cohort study in a southern province of China</article-title><source>Environ Res</source><year>2022</year><month>03</month><volume>204</volume><issue>Pt D</issue><fpage>112403</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2021.112403</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">34800533</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref39"><label>39</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Qian</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> and birth outcomes: estimating the association and attributable risk using a birth cohort study in nine Chinese cities</article-title><source>Environ Int</source><year>2019</year><month>05</month><volume>126</volume><fpage>329</fpage><lpage>335</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.017</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">30825752</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref40"><label>40</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sheridan</surname><given-names>P</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ilango</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Bruckner</surname><given-names>TA</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Q</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Basu</surname><given-names>R</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Benmarhnia</surname><given-names>T</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Ambient fine particulate matter and preterm birth in California: identification of critical exposure windows</article-title><source>Am J Epidemiol</source><year>2019</year><volume>188</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>1608</fpage><lpage>1615</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aje/kwz120</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">31107509</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref41"><label>41</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alexander</surname><given-names>EK</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Pearce</surname><given-names>EN</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Brent</surname><given-names>GA</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>2017 guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and the postpartum</article-title><source>Thyroid</source><year>2017</year><month>03</month><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>315</fpage><lpage>389</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/thy.2016.0457</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">28056690</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref42"><label>42</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>C</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Shan</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Mao</surname><given-names>J</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Assessment of thyroid function during first-trimester pregnancy: what is the rational upper limit of serum TSH during the first trimester in Chinese pregnant women?</article-title><source>J Clin Endocrinol Metab</source><year>2014</year><month>01</month><volume>99</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>73</fpage><lpage>79</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1210/jc.2013-1674</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">24276458</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref43"><label>43</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kirwa</surname><given-names>K</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Feric</surname><given-names>Z</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Manjourides</surname><given-names>J</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Preterm birth and PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Puerto Rico: evidence from the PROTECT birth cohort</article-title><source>Environ Health</source><year>2021</year><month>06</month><day>11</day><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>69</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12940-021-00748-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">34116688</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref44"><label>44</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Laurent</surname><given-names>O</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Hu</surname><given-names>J</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>A statewide nested case-control study of preterm birth and air pollution by source and composition: California, 2001-2008</article-title><source>Environ Health Perspect</source><year>2016</year><month>09</month><volume>124</volume><issue>9</issue><fpage>1479</fpage><lpage>1486</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1289/ehp.1510133</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">26895492</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref45"><label>45</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fleischer</surname><given-names>NL</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Merialdi</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>van Donkelaar</surname><given-names>A</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Outdoor air pollution, preterm birth, and low birth weight: analysis of the World Health Organization Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health</article-title><source>Environ Health Perspect</source><year>2014</year><month>04</month><volume>122</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>425</fpage><lpage>430</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1289/ehp.1306837</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">24508912</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref46"><label>46</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Bobb</surname><given-names>JF</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ito</surname><given-names>K</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Ambient fine particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and preterm birth in New York City</article-title><source>Environ Health Perspect</source><year>2016</year><month>08</month><volume>124</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>1283</fpage><lpage>1290</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1289/ehp.1510266</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">26862865</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref47"><label>47</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>G</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Belanger</surname><given-names>K</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ebisu</surname><given-names>K</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Bell</surname><given-names>ML</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Fine particulate matter and risk of preterm birth in Connecticut in 2000-2006: a longitudinal study</article-title><source>Am J Epidemiol</source><year>2014</year><month>01</month><day>1</day><volume>179</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aje/kwt216</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">24068199</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref48"><label>48</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Consortium on Thyroid and Pregnancy&#x2014;Study Group on Preterm Birth</collab><name name-style="western"><surname>Korevaar</surname><given-names>TIM</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Derakhshan</surname><given-names>A</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Association of thyroid function test abnormalities and thyroid autoimmunity with preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title><source>JAMA</source><year>2019</year><month>08</month><day>20</day><volume>322</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>632</fpage><lpage>641</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1001/jama.2019.10931</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">31429897</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref49"><label>49</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>D</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Liao</surname><given-names>F</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>F</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>The health effects of ambient PM<sub>2.5</sub> and potential mechanisms</article-title><source>Ecotoxicol Environ Saf</source><year>2016</year><month>06</month><volume>128</volume><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.01.030</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">26896893</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref50"><label>50</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>XN</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>RQ</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>JL</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>SH</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Li</surname><given-names>JW</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>XX</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>PM<sub>2.5</sub>-induced inflammation and myocardial cell injury in rats</article-title><source>Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci</source><year>2021</year><month>11</month><volume>25</volume><issue>21</issue><fpage>6670</fpage><lpage>6677</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26355/eurrev_202111_27111</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">34787871</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref51"><label>51</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Babi&#x0107; Leko</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Gunja&#x010D;a</surname><given-names>I</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Plei&#x0107;</surname><given-names>N</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Zemunik</surname><given-names>T</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Environmental factors affecting thyroid-stimulating hormone and thyroid hormone levels</article-title><source>Int J Mol Sci</source><year>2021</year><month>06</month><day>17</day><volume>22</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>6521</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms22126521</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">34204586</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref52"><label>52</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>De Vito</surname><given-names>P</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Incerpi</surname><given-names>S</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Pedersen</surname><given-names>JZ</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Luly</surname><given-names>P</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>FB</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Davis</surname><given-names>PJ</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Thyroid hormones as modulators of immune activities at the cellular level</article-title><source>Thyroid</source><year>2011</year><month>08</month><volume>21</volume><issue>8</issue><fpage>879</fpage><lpage>890</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/thy.2010.0429</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">21745103</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref53"><label>53</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Potenza</surname><given-names>M</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Via</surname><given-names>MA</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Yanagisawa</surname><given-names>RT</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>Excess thyroid hormone and carbohydrate metabolism</article-title><source>Endocr Pract</source><year>2009</year><month>04</month><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>254</fpage><lpage>262</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4158/EP.15.3.254</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">19364696</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref54"><label>54</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sibai</surname><given-names>BM</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Caritis</surname><given-names>SN</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Hauth</surname><given-names>JC</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Preterm delivery in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus or chronic hypertension relative to women with uncomplicated pregnancies. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network</article-title><source>Am J Obstet Gynecol</source><year>2000</year><month>12</month><volume>183</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>1520</fpage><lpage>1524</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1067/mob.2000.107621</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">11120521</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref55"><label>55</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Vadillo-Ortega</surname><given-names>F</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Osornio-Vargas</surname><given-names>A</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Buxton</surname><given-names>MA</given-names> </name><etal/></person-group><article-title>Air pollution, inflammation and preterm birth: a potential mechanistic link</article-title><source>Med Hypotheses</source><year>2014</year><month>02</month><volume>82</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>219</fpage><lpage>224</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mehy.2013.11.042</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">24382337</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref><ref id="ref56"><label>56</label><nlm-citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>PC</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Roberts</surname><given-names>JM</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Catov</surname><given-names>JM</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Talbott</surname><given-names>EO</given-names> </name><name name-style="western"><surname>Ritz</surname><given-names>B</given-names> </name></person-group><article-title>First trimester exposure to ambient air pollution, pregnancy complications and adverse birth outcomes in Allegheny County, PA</article-title><source>Matern Child Health J</source><year>2013</year><month>04</month><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>545</fpage><lpage>555</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10995-012-1028-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="medline">22544506</pub-id></nlm-citation></ref></ref-list><app-group><supplementary-material id="app1"><label>Multimedia Appendix 1</label><p>The time frame of PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure for study participants during the entire pregnancy. PM<sub>2.5</sub>: particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of &#x2264;2.5 &#x03BC;m.</p><media xlink:href="publichealth_v10i1e53879_app1.png" xlink:title="PNG File, 46 KB"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="app2"><label>Multimedia Appendix 2</label><p>Pearson correlation coefficients of air pollutants and meteorological variables during entire pregnancy.</p><media xlink:href="publichealth_v10i1e53879_app2.doc" xlink:title="DOC File, 31 KB"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="app3"><label>Multimedia Appendix 3</label><p>Sensitivity analyses of associations between trimester-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and risk of PTB according to maternal prepregnancy status of TSH. PM<sub>2.5</sub>: particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of &#x2264;2.5 &#x03BC;m; PTB: preterm birth; TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone.</p><media xlink:href="publichealth_v10i1e53879_app3.doc" xlink:title="DOC File, 41 KB"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="app4"><label>Multimedia Appendix 4</label><p>Associations between trimester-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and risk of PTB according to maternal preconception TSH levels using 0.10-4.00 mIU/L as the reference range. PM<sub>2.5</sub>: particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of &#x2264;2.5 &#x03BC;m; PTB: preterm birth; TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone.</p><media xlink:href="publichealth_v10i1e53879_app4.doc" xlink:title="DOC File, 38 KB"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="app5"><label>Multimedia Appendix 5</label><p>Associations between trimester-specific PM<sub>2.5</sub> exposure and risk of PTB according to maternal prepregnancy status of TSH, excluding participants missing baseline characteristics (N=624,349). PM<sub>2.5</sub>: particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of &#x2264;2.5 &#x03BC;m; PTB: preterm birth; TSH: thyroid stimulating hormone.</p><media xlink:href="publichealth_v10i1e53879_app5.doc" xlink:title="DOC File, 36 KB"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="app6"><label>Multimedia Appendix 6</label><p>HR (95% CI) of EPTB associated with each 10-&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup> increase in air pollutant concentration during the pregnancy in 2-pollutant models compared to single-pollutant models. Single-pollutant models were adjusted for maternal age, delivery mode, prepregnancy BMI, maternal smoking, maternal drinking, delivery season, and infant&#x2019;s sex, as well as for mean ambient temperature and relative humidity during the pregnancy with natural cubic splines of 6 and 3 <italic>df</italic>, respectively. Further, 2-pollutant models were adjusted for the variable considered in single-pollutant models, in addition to including the air pollutant shown. HR: hazard ratio; EPTB: early preterm birth.</p><media xlink:href="publichealth_v10i1e53879_app6.png" xlink:title="PNG File, 260 KB"/></supplementary-material><supplementary-material id="app7"><label>Multimedia Appendix 7</label><p>HR (95% CI) of LPTB associated with each 10-&#x03BC;g/m<sup>3</sup> increase in air pollutant concentration during the pregnancy in 2-pollutant models compared to single-pollutant models. Single-pollutant models were adjusted for maternal age, delivery mode, prepregnancy BMI, maternal smoking, maternal drinking, delivery season, and infant&#x2019;s sex, as well as for mean ambient temperature and relative humidity during the pregnancy with natural cubic splines of 6 and 3 <italic>df</italic>, respectively. Further, 2-pollutant models were adjusted for the variable considered in single-pollutant models, in addition to including the air pollutant shown above. HR: hazard ratio; LPTB: late preterm birth.</p><media xlink:href="publichealth_v10i1e53879_app7.png" xlink:title="PNG File, 250 KB"/></supplementary-material></app-group></back></article>