This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://publichealth.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
General obesity and abdominal obesity, typically measured by BMI and waist circumference (WC), respectively, are associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, the magnitude of the association of these two obesity indicators and their joint association with the onset of T2DM remain controversial.
The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between these two obesity indicators and T2DM among the Chinese population to contribute scientific evidence for appropriate T2DM interventions.
A cohort of 3001 eligible participants was selected from the Ningbo Adult Chronic Disease Surveillance Project running since 2015. Based on BMI, individuals were categorized into groups of underweight or normal, overweight, and obesity. Based on WC, individuals were categorized in groups of normal, precentral obesity, and central obesity. Follow-up was performed by linking data of the baseline data set with the diabetes registry data set and the vital registry data set (both from the Ningbo Municipal Integrated Noncommunicable Disease Collaborative Management System), mainly using the participants’ identity numbers. Follow-up was completed when a participant was diagnosed with T2DM. The associations were estimated with multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression.
In the cohort, 90 of 3001 participants developed T2DM (incidence density: 6.483/1000 person-years) with a median 4.72 years of follow-up. After controlling for age, sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking status, and family history of diabetes, the multivariate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) across underweight/normal, overweight, and obesity BMI categories were 1.000, 1.653 (95% CI 1.030-2.654), and 2.375 (95% CI 1.261-4.473), respectively. The multivariate adjusted HRs across the normal, precentral obesity, and central obesity WC categories were 1.000, 1.215 (95% CI 0.689-2.142), and 1.663 (95% CI 1.016-2.723), respectively. Compared with the reference group (normal WC with an underweight/normal BMI), the multivariate adjusted HR for participants with both central obesity according to WC and obesity according to BMI was 2.489 (95% CI 1.284-4.825).
Both elevated BMI and WC at baseline increased the risk of T2DM. Compared with WC, BMI as an obesity indicator was more strongly associated with the onset of T2DM.
Diabetes mellitus is a group of metabolic disorders characterized by elevated blood glucose levels, which can lead to various health problems and severe complications with disease progression [
BMI and waist circumference (WC) are two of the key indicators used to measure general obesity and abdominal obesity, respectively. Some studies found that compared with that of people without T2DM, the proportion of body fat distributed in the abdominal area was higher among patients who were not classified as obese according to BMI criteria, whereas some people with obesity were metabolically healthy [
Although both general obesity and abdominal obesity have been confirmed to be associated with the risk of T2DM, the magnitude of these two obesity indicators and their joint association with T2DM remain controversial [
We conducted the baseline survey (the Ningbo Adult Chronic Disease Surveillance Project) on October 26 and December 31, 2015. This was a population-based project with the aims of understanding the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control situation, and to explore the relevant behavior risk factors of major chronic diseases (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia) among Chinese adult residents aged 15-79 years in Ningbo city.
A total of 5280 residents were selected using a multistage cluster random sampling method covering 11 districts and counties in Ningbo. In the first stage, three towns or streets were selected from each county or district using a proportionate-to-population size sampling scheme. In the second stage, two administrative villages or neighborhood communities were selected from each town or street using the same method as used in the first stage. In the third stage, one village containing at least 105 households was selected from each neighborhood community or administrative village. In the final stage, 105 randomly selected households from each village and one resident aged 15-74 years in each household whose date of birth was closest to the 15th was selected as the survey participant. Finally, a total of 5160 residents completed the survey with a response rate of 97.73% (5160/5280).
Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) aged ≥40 years, (2) living in the current district or county for at least 6 months, and (3) capable of communicating in Mandarin or local dialects with reading skills. The exclusion criterion was having been diagnosed with diabetes by clinicians in hospitals or community health service centers at the time of the baseline survey. A total of 3001 eligible participants aged above 40 years were selected from the pool of 5160 participants. All participants signed the written informed consent form.
The research protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Ningbo Center for Disease Control and Prevention (approval number 201702).
The data collection methods included a questionnaire survey, physical measurements, and laboratory tests. The questionnaire consisted of five components, including physical activities, environment and facilities, signs and symptoms, dietary and drinking habits, and demographic characteristics. All questionnaires were filled in face-to-face by trained staff. The completeness and accuracy of the questionnaire were double-checked by quality control personnel following the quality control requirements. We measured the height, weight, WC, blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) for all participants. The physical examinations were carried out by the investigators using uniform devices and methods. Participants fasted the night before measurements were taken. The height, weight, and WC were measured while the participant was wearing light clothing (shorts and T-shirt) and without shoes. The participants were required to avoid vigorous exercises, eating, and drinking beverages (especially caffeinated drinks) within 30 minutes before measuring blood pressure and to rest quietly for 5 minutes before the first measurement. The blood pressure was tested three times and the average was taken. Five milliliters of the fasting venous blood was collected from the participants to detect FPG, HbA1c, TC, TG, HDL-C, and LDL-C.
The data sources for the follow-up were obtained from the Ningbo Municipal Integrated Noncommunicable Disease Collaborative Management System (NCDCMS), which has continuously collected surveillance data since 2009 and covered the whole population of Ningbo. This system, which has been proven to obtain high-quality data and to have a low rate of underreporting (<5%), collects four types of noncommunicable disease data (diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease and cardiac arrest, cerebrovascular disease, malignant neoplasms) and cause of death data in a real-time manner [
Flowchart of data linkage. T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus.
The endpoint of follow-up was a diagnosis of T2DM. The participants who failed to be linked with the diabetes registry data set were regarded as censored. According to the Chinese Type 2 Diabetes Prevention and Control 2017 Guidelines, T2DM was defined as typical clinical manifestations (thirst, frequent urination, overeating and unexplained weight loss), and (1) random plasma glucose≥11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL), (2) FPG≥7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL), or (3) oral glucose tolerance test 2-hour plasma glucose≥11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) [
The follow-up time was calculated as the date of diagnosis minus the start date of the baseline survey (October 26, 2015) for participants who linked with the diabetes registry data set, as the date of death minus the start date of the baseline survey (October 26, 2015) for participants who linked with the vital registration data set, and as the set end time of follow-up (July 15, 2020) minus the start date of the baseline survey (October 26, 2015) for participants who failed to link with these two data sets.
According to the 2013 Health Industry Standards of the People’s Republic of China “Criteria of Weight for Adults” and the World Health Organization report of WC and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), BMI was categorized as underweight or normal (≤23.9 kg/m2), overweight (24-27.9 kg/m2), and obesity (≥28 kg/m2). WC was divided into three groups as follows: (1) normal: WC<85 cm for men and WC<80 cm for women; (2) precentral obesity: WC of 85-89.9 cm for men, WC of 80-84.9 cm for women; and (3) central obesity: WC≥90 cm for men WC≥85 cm for women [
Demographic factors included age, sex, education level, marital status, residence place, and occupation. Lifestyle factors included smoking status, alcohol consumption, and physical activity level. Alcohol consumption was derived from the question: “Have you had any kind of alcoholic drink in the past 12 months?” Participants were divided into three groups: No; Yes, within 30 days; Yes, 30 days ago. Participants who currently smoke cigarettes or quit smoking were defined as ever smokers. Participants who never smoke cigarettes were defined as never smokers. Physical activity was classified into the following three levels in strict accordance with the Chinese guidelines for data processing and analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire: low, moderate, and high. A moderate physical level was defined as (1) 3 or more days of vigorous-intensity activity of at least 20 minutes per day; (2) 5 or more days of moderate-intensity activity and/or walking at least 30 minutes per day; or (3) 5 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate-intensity activities, or vigorous-intensity activities achieving a minimum total physical activity of at least 600 metabolic equivalent (MET)-minutes/week. A high physical activity level was defined as: (1) vigorous-intensity activity at least 3 days per week achieving a minimum total physical activity of at least 1500 MET-minutes/week or (2) 7 or more days of any combination of walking, moderate-intensity activities, or vigorous-intensity activities achieving a minimum total physical activity of at least 3000 MET-minutes/week [
Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure≥90 mmHg, current use of antihypertensive medication, or self-reported history of hypertension [
The incidence density of T2DM was obtained by dividing the number of T2DM cases by the person-years of follow-up. Normally distributed continuous data are described as mean (SD) and skewed-distributed continuous data are described as median (IQR). Categorical data are described as count (percentage). Differences in the distribution of baseline characteristics between participants with and without T2DM were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney
Univariate Cox regressions were performed for each exposure (BMI categories, central obesity categories) and covariates (residence place, sex, age, education level, marital status, occupation, family history of diabetes, alcohol consumption, smoking status, physical activity, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) to calculate the unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. Age and sex–adjusted HRs with 95% CIs were estimated with Cox proportional hazard models stratified by BMI and central obesity categories adjusting for age and sex. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were performed to calculate HRs with 95% CIs based on the different categories of BMI and central obesity by adjusting for potential confounders (age, sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking status, family history of diabetes).
To estimate the joint effect of general obesity according to BMI and central obesity according to WC on the risk of T2DM, the participants were classified into six groups based on the BMI and WC categories. The adjusted HRs along with potential confounders were estimated using Cox models. BMI and WC were also included in the Cox regression model as continuous variables, either separately or together. The proportionality assumption of the hazards in the Cox regression analyses was tested by Schoenfeld residuals and the assumption was satisfied for all analyses. Forest plots were used to compare the independent and joint associations of BMI and WC. All data management and statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software R version 3.4.3.
The final cohort included 3001 participants at baseline with a median age of 54 years. These participants were followed up for a median of 4.72 years, comprising 13,880.8 person-years of follow-up. Overall, 90 of the 3001 participants developed T2DM, with an incidence density of 6.483 per 1000 person-years by the end of follow-up. As shown in
At baseline, 1570 (52.32%) of the participants were underweight or normal, 1159 (38.62%) were overweight, and 272 (9.06%) had obesity. Compared to the underweight or normal group, participants in the overweight and obesity groups tended to have higher WC, SBP, DBP, HbA1c, LDL-C, TC, and TG; lower HDL-C; and a higher proportion of hypertension and dyslipidemia. There were 1397 (46.55%) participants with normal WC, 721 (24.03%) with precentral obesity, and 865 (28.82%) with central obesity, demonstrating similar patterns as observed for BMI categories.
Baseline characteristics of the 3001 participants by diabetes status.
Variables | Total (N=3001) | T2DMa (n=90) | No T2DM (n=2911) | Cramer V | ||
|
.50 | 0.01 | ||||
|
Urban | 1573 (52.4) | 44 (48.9) | 1529 (52.5) |
|
|
|
Rural | 1428 (47.6) | 46 (51.1) | 1382 (47.5) |
|
|
|
.56 | 0.009 | ||||
|
Male | 1277 (42.6) | 41 (45.6) | 1236 (42.5) |
|
|
|
Female | 1724 (57.4) | 49 (54.4) | 1675 (57.5) |
|
|
|
.37 | 0.026 | ||||
|
Primary school and above | 1423 (47.4) | 44 (48.9) | 1379 (47.4) |
|
|
|
Middle school | 1048 (34.9) | 35 (38.9) | 1013 (34.8) |
|
|
|
High school and above | 530 (17.7) | 11 (12.2) | 519 (17.8) |
|
|
|
.52 | 0.028 | ||||
|
Single | 46 (1.5) | 2 (2.2) | 44 (1.5) |
|
|
|
Married | 2734 (91.1) | 78 (86.7) | 2656 (91.2) |
|
|
|
Widowed | 151 (5.0) | 7 (7.8) | 144 (4.9) |
|
|
|
Divorced/separated/ cohabitated | 70 (2.3) | 3 (3.3) | 67 (2.3) |
|
|
|
.20 | 0.039 | ||||
|
Agriculture/husbandry/transportation | 803 (26.8) | 24 (26.7) | 779 (26.8) |
|
|
|
Government agency/enterprises | 324 (10.8) | 6 (6.7) | 318 (10.9) |
|
|
|
Other industries | 589 (19.6) | 13 (14.4) | 576 (19.8) |
|
|
|
Unemployed/housework/retired | 1285 (42.8) | 47 (52.2) | 1238 (42.5) |
|
|
|
<.001 | 0.074 | ||||
|
No | 2347 (78.2) | 57 (63.3) | 2290 (78.7) |
|
|
|
Yes | 407 (13.6) | 25 (27.8) | 382 (13.1) |
|
|
|
I don’t know | 247 (8.2) | 8 (8.9) | 239 (8.2) |
|
|
|
.67 | 0.016 | ||||
|
No | 2062 (68.7) | 62 (68.9) | 2000 (68.7) |
|
|
|
Yes, within 30 days | 780 (26.0) | 25 (27.8) | 755 (25.9) |
|
|
|
Yes, 30 days ago | 159 (5.3) | 3 (3.3) | 156 (5.4) |
|
|
|
.38 | 0.013 | ||||
|
Never smoker | 2158 (71.9) | 61 (67.8) | 2097 (72.0) |
|
|
|
Ever smoker | 843 (28.1) | 29 (32.2) | 814 (28.0) |
|
|
|
.53 | 0.021 | ||||
|
Low level | 418 (13.9) | 16 (17.8) | 402 (13.8) |
|
|
|
Median level | 2455 (81.8) | 71 (78.9) | 2384 (81.9) |
|
|
|
High level | 128 (4.3) | 3 (3.3) | 125 (4.3) |
|
|
|
<.001 | 0.079 | ||||
|
No | 1492 (49.7) | 24 (26.7) | 1468 (50.4) |
|
|
|
Yes | 1509 (50.3) | 66 (73.3) | 1443 (49.6) |
|
|
|
.01 | 0.045 | ||||
|
No | 1231 (41.0) | 25 (27.8) | 1206 (41.4) |
|
|
|
Yes | 1770 (59.0) | 65 (72.2) | 1705 (58.6) |
|
|
|
<.001 | 0.072 | ||||
|
Underweight or normal | 1570 (52.3) | 30 (33.3) | 1540 (52.9) |
|
|
|
Overweight | 1159 (38.6) | 45 (50.0) | 1114 (38.3) |
|
|
|
Obesity | 272 (9.1) | 15 (16.7) | 257 (8.8) |
|
|
|
.002 | 0.064 | ||||
|
Normal | 1415 (47.2) | 29 (32.2) | 1386 (47.6) |
|
|
|
Precentral obesity | 721 (24.0) | 21 (23.3) | 700 (24.0) |
|
|
|
Central obesity | 865 (28.8) | 40 (44.4) | 825 (28.3) |
|
|
BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR) | 23.81 (21.94-25.89) | 25.14 (23.12-26.95) | 23.77 (21.90-25.84) | <.001 | N/Ad | |
WC (cm), median (IQR) | 82.25 (76.50-88.25) | 86.00 (80.30-90.84) | 82.20 (76.50-88.10) | <.001 | N/A | |
FBGe (mmol/L), median (IQR) | 4.94 (4.60-5.38) | 5.90 (5.23-6.99) | 4.93 (4.59-5.36) | <.001 | N/A | |
HbA1cf (%), median (IQR) | 4.70 (4.30-5.10) | 5.40 (4.80-6.18) | 4.70 (4.30-5.10) | <.001 | N/A | |
Age (years), median (IQR) | 54.00 (48.00-63.00) | 58.00 (52.00-65.50) | 54.00 (48.00-63.00) | <.001 | N/A |
aT2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus.
bDifferences in the distribution of participants with and without T2DM were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney
cWC: waist circumference.
dN/A: not applicable.
eFBG: fasting blood glucose.
fHbA1c: glycated hemoglobin.
BMI categories, WC categories, age, occupation, family history of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were significantly associated with the incidence of T2DM. Compared with participants of normal weight, the overweight (HR 2.052, 95% CI 1.293-3.258) and obesity (HR 2.924, 95% CI 1.573-5.434) categories were significantly associated with an increased risk of the development of T2DM. There was a dose-response relationship between the BMI categories and the onset of T2DM (
The independent and joint associations of BMI and WC with T2DM development are displayed in
Among the participants who were categorized in the central obesity group, the age and sex–adjusted HRs increased successively for those categorized in the underweight or normal, overweight, and obesity groups according to BMI compared with the reference group (normal WC with an underweight or normal BMI). Compared to the reference group, the multivariate adjusted HR for participants with both central obesity according to WC and obesity according to BMI was much higher than that for the independent association of central obesity or obesity (
When BMI and WC were treated as continuous variables, the HR of BMI was still slightly higher than that of WC. When the BMI and WC were considered together in the regression model using mutual adjustment, BMI, but not WC, was significantly associated with the risk of T2DM (
Risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus stratified by categories of BMI and waist circumference (WC) in univariate, age and sex–adjusted, and multivariate-adjusted regressions.
Categories | Univariate, HRa (95% CI) | Age and sex–adjustedb, HR (95% CI) | Multivariatec, HR (95% CI) | |
|
||||
|
Underweight or normal (n=1570) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Overweight (n=1159) | 2.052 (1.293-3.258) | 1.941 (1.221-3.087) | 1.653 (1.030-2.654) |
|
Obesity (n=272) | 2.924 (1.573-5.434) | 2.918 (1.569-5.425) | 2.375 (1.261-4.473) |
|
<.001 | <.001 | .004 | |
|
||||
|
Normal WC (n=1415) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Precentral obesity (n=721) | 1.425 (0.813-2.499) | 1.374 (0.767-2.364) | 1.215 (0.689-2.142) |
|
Central obesity (n=865) | 2.289 (1.419-3.691) | 2.059 (1.273-2.059) | 1.663 (1.016-2.723) |
|
<.001 | .003 | .04 | |
|
||||
|
Underweight or normal BMI+normal WC (n=1456) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
Underweight or normal BMI+central obesity (n=114) | 1.418 (0.430-4.676) | 1.316 (0.398-4.352) | 1.170 (0.353-3.878) |
|
Overweight+normal WC (n=650) | 1.833 (1.044-3.218) | 1.819 (1.035-3.198) | 1.608 (0.908-2.847) |
|
Overweight+central obesity (n=509) | 2.479 (1.421-4.323) | 2.185 (1.249-3.823) | 1.756 (0.991-3.110) |
|
Obesity+normal WC (n=30) | 1.777 (0.241-13.07) | 1.913 (0.259-14.08) | 1.713 (0.231-12.65) |
|
Obesity+central obesity (n=242) | 3.169 (1.662-6.044) | 3.116 (1.633-5.945) | 2.489 (1.284-4.825) |
aHR: hazard ratio.
bAdjusted for age and sex.
cAdjusted for age, sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and family history of diabetes.
Forest plot of the association between categories of BMI and/or waist circumference (WC) and the onset of type 2 diabetes mellitus adjusting for age, gender, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and family history of diabetes.
Risk of type 2 diabetes based on BMI and waist circumference (WC) as continuous variables.
Models | Univariate, HRa (95% CI) | Age and sex–adjustedb, HR (95% CI) | Multivariatec, HR (95% CI) | |
|
||||
|
BMI | 1.142 (1.078-1.210) | 1.141 (1.076-1.210) | 1.118 (1.049-1.191) |
|
WC | 1.041 (1.019-1.063) | 1.038 (1.015-1.061) | 1.029 (1.004-1.054) |
|
||||
|
BMI | 1.116 (1.021-1.221) | 1.143 (1.041-1.254) | 1.130 (1.027-1.243) |
|
WC | 1.011 (0.979-1.045) | 1.000 (0.965-1.035) | 0.995 (0.960-1.031) |
aHR: hazard ratio.
bAdjusted for age and sex.
cAdjusted for age, sex, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and family history of diabetes.
dBMI and WC were considered together in the regression model.
In this study, we found that both elevated BMI and WC at baseline increased the risk of T2DM. Moreover, the magnitude of association of BMI with T2DM was stronger than that of WC, regardless of treating the exposures as continuous or categorical variables, which was consistent with previous studies conducted in a Chinese population [
The discrepancies in conclusions among studies were likely due to the differences in ethnicity of the populations. Since there is an assumption that the superiority of WC to BMI for T2DM prediction was based on the characteristics of the study population, previous studies mainly conducted in white-dominant populations or in the western sociocultural context might lead to discrepancies [
In our study, after 4.72 years of follow-up, 90 participants developed T2DM with a total incidence density of 6.483 per 1000 person-years, similar to the study of Yang et al [
There were some limitations of this study. First, the number of participants at baseline was relatively small and the follow-up time was short. Referring to the joint associations of BMI and WC adjusting for age and sex, the HRs revealed a dose-response relationship in the overweight category. However, due to the short time of follow-up and relatively young baseline participants in this study, only 90 participants were diagnosed with T2DM. The number of newly diagnosed T2DM participants in each BMI category might not have been sufficient to detect the dose-response relationship with the increase of WC. Second, the distribution and composition of body fat might gradually change during follow-up, along with the corresponding BMI and WC. In this study, the change values of BMI and WC during follow-up were not adjusted in the models owing to the study design, which may have influenced the results. Data linkage, the key technique used in this study, has become a popular research method for generating population-level electronic cohorts, and is used as a supplement to conventional cohort studies [
The Chinese population generally has a higher percentage of body fat and a greater propensity to central obesity compared with those of western counterparts under the same BMI [
A study with longer-term follow-up is needed to further investigate the joint association of BMI and WC with the risk of T2DM. Although BMI, WC, and the WHR are inexpensive and easy measures to assess the adipose tissue, there is growing interest in using magnetic resonance techniques for evaluating total body fat and different fat compartments in western countries. Magnetic resonance imaging provides high accuracy in quantitatively detecting the subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue, which could be an option to further explore the association between obesity and T2DM accurately [
In conclusion, both elevated BMI and WC at baseline increased the risk of T2DM. Compared with WC, BMI as an obesity indicator was more strongly associated with the onset of T2DM among Chinese adults in Ningbo. We recommend that residents of this population, especially the elderly, maintain a normal weight and a healthy lifestyle.
fasting plasma glucose
glycated hemoglobin
high-density lipoprotein cholesterol
hazard ratio
identification
low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
metabolic equivalent
Ningbo Municipal Integrated Noncommunicable Disease Collaborative Management System
type 2 diabetes mellitus
total cholesterol
triglycerides
waist circumference
waist-to-hip ratio
The authors wish to thank Dr Stacy Davlin and Dr Charlalynn Harris for providing their professional advice for this study, as well as Miss Chensheng Zhang for the abstract revision. In addition, the authors thank all investigators and study participants for their support and contributions to this study. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81872721), National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFC1310902 and 2018YFC1315305), and Ningbo Medical and Health Brand Discipline (PPXK2018-10).
None declared.